Just published second article about testing with #Kotlin. Now it is time for testing state/interactions and #Mockito stubs/mocks. https://t.co/7IBKI4jSvH
@jud_czyta U Pani ma 4, a u innej by miał 6. I jak potem konkurować o miejsce w dobrej szkole? Stawianie punktów za oceny to patologia, promowanie cwaniactwa i układów.
None of this is satire.
→ A company spent $500,000,000 on Claude in one month because nobody set usage limits
→ Uber ran leaderboards ranking engineers by how much AI they used, not what they shipped
→ Uber burned their entire 2026 budget by April. Their COO said he can’t connect any of it to consumer features
→ A CTO told Axios employees were using enterprise AI to check the weather
→ Microsoft canceled most Claude Code licenses because the token bill spiraled
→ Companies are now laying people off to pay the AI bill. Not because AI replaced the work. Because the bill replaced the headcount.
@SlawomirMentzen Trzeba dać dać dobry przykład i rozpocząć od etatowych polityków co nie potrafią się z pracy utrzymać. Kolega Bosak może się zgłosi na ochotnika.
You can “build for the future with AI” without laying people off. E.g.,:
• Help people build new skills
• Redesign roles and career paths around the new reality
• Give time, tools, and support to adapt
If a company like CloudFlare, with strong growth and 2B+ in ARR, can’t invest in helping its people evolve, it’s hard to see how trust survives.
Anyhow, I don’t think this is about building the future or adapting to AI. It’s about bad leadership: overhiring, poor planning, and treating staffing as a cost to cut instead of a responsibility to manage.
Sam Altman:
iPhone is the greatest consumer device, but it wasn't built for a world where your device needs a full life context
"the phone is on or off in your pocket or in your hand"
Future devices need to quietly understand conversations, remember them, and make them useful for a personal AGI later
Director James Cameron on why Big Tech owning AGI is scarier than any science fiction he's ever made:
"AGI will not emerge from a government funded program. It will emerge from one of the tech giants currently funding this multi-billion dollar research."
And when that happens, he warns, you won't get a vote on it:
"So then you'll be living in a world that you didn't agree to, didn't vote for, that you are co-inhabiting with a super intelligent alien species that answers to the goals and rules of a corporation."
A corporation that already knows everything about you:
"An entity which has access to the comms, beliefs, everything you ever said, and the whereabouts of every person in the country via your personal data."
From there, the slide toward something far darker is shorter than most people think:
"Surveillance capitalism can toggle pretty quickly into digital totalitarianism."
And even the best-case outcome isn't reassuring. Tech giants becoming the self-appointed arbiters of human good is, as he puts it, the fox guarding the hen house.
He's not buying the idea that these companies would stay benevolent with that kind of power:
"They would never ever think of using that power against us and strip mining us for our last drop of cash."
The sarcasm is the point.
Cameron has spent four decades imagining worst-case futures on screen. His verdict on this one:
"That's a scarier scenario than what I presented in the Terminator 40 years ago, if for no other reason than it's no longer science fiction."
Announcing Amazon S3 Files.
The first and only cloud object store with fully-featured, high-performance file system access.
Learn more here. https://t.co/rNuWa5Rsi2