@gopTODD The law requiring age verification for porn sites is onerous and ineffective. If you really want to protect children you should go after the religious organizations that shield child rapists.
@GovCox The law requiring age verification for porn sites is onerous and ineffective. If you really want to protect children you should go after the religious organizations that shield child rapists.
@showmethecaucus @CDDolanCam @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Unlike Bernie, she doesn't say one thing and do another, even if her position or tactics change.
@showmethecaucus @CDDolanCam @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Like I said, I am voting for Warren because she will get it done, as openly and honestly as she can.
@showmethecaucus @CDDolanCam @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Right, I am sure the anonymous wealthy donors are fighting to keep money out of politics.
Why else would they donate?
If this young man made pornos, what would his stage name be?
#GodAwfulMovies wants to know.
(Description: Buff, Jesus-looking character without shirt).
@PiatPod He's ridden ass from Bethany to Jerusalem. His second coming is only the start of your night. There's no man he can't raise. Coming to the stage, that princely piece of ass, the gay and the light, the alpha who's so mega, it's... THE WOODWORKER!!!
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren I have a major problem with all PAC's, which is why I respected Warrens' attempt to do without them, but I recognize they are necessary for a campaigns' viability these days.
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Given the multiple donations well in excess of 5k, the former and current board members who work closely with the campaign, being clearly primarily focused on getting Sanders elected, and attempting to appear transparent while hiding all of this doesn't raise questions for you?
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren It would also be helpful for anyone trying to buy influence.
Also, they haven't disclosed their donors for months.
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren No, the AP report came weeks before the watchdog group filed and was based on Our Revolutions' tax filings and independent reporting.
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Furthermore, its spending does not need to be disclosed until after the election and they may be violating campaign finance law.
I know you didn't follow the link, so I am not surprised you failed to address the actual points it brought up.
@showmethecaucus @emrazz @ProtegatX @CIASupporter @MSAMYBC @ewarren Sure, let's go down that hole.
Our Revolution does indeed disclose the names of its donors, but it is not required to, so there is no mechanism for enforcing full disclosure.
They do not disclose how much each donor contributes, and unlike super PAC's the amount is unlimited.