D Warner

Medical Freedom Fighter, Election Integrity Investigator
since Nov 4, 2020!

[Matt The Welder @Matt_The_Welder]

🚨 2 DAYS LEFT 🚨

@GovRonDeSantis ordered ALL automated license plate readers removed from state road rights-of-way by Sept. 30.

Instead, some sheriffs’ offices are simply MOVING them.
In Polk County, Flock cameras were moved onto private property while still scanning vehicles on a state road.
Other counties removed Flock cameras and found numerous unpermitted cameras nobody knows who owns.

The deadline is 2 days away.

[Riley Gaines @Riley_Gaines_]

Listen to all three minutes. No notes, just a mom who doesn't play about her kids.

This is the new standard for parents who care about what their kids are learning in school.

[🇺🇸 𝗧 𝗢 𝗠 𝗠 𝗬 ✦ 𝗧 𝗔 𝗧 𝗨 𝗠 ✦ 𝗡 𝗘 𝗪 𝗦 @BenKaxton]

Cops murdered Rosanne Boyland on January 6th and lie about it til this very day.

[THE BLACK SHEEP @TheBlackSheep84]

Made in a Hollywood basement

[Ann Vandersteel™️ @annvandersteel]

🐊 Florida’s election “gold standard”? Show us the receipts.

Chris Gleason’s @immutablechrist report cites an ES&S memo allowing Florida election offices to select “save no images” after scanners use digital images to tabulate ballots.

He also documents supervisors’ lobbying push to designate paper ballots as the public record instead of digital ballot images.

Why fight to keep fewer records when voters want more transparency?

Preserve the images. Release the audit logs. Let the public check the count.

And restore hand marked paper ballots, hand counted in smaller precincts.

Trust is earned. “Because we said so” doesn’t cut it.

[The Gateway Pundit @gatewaypundit]

Buffalo attorney Ralph Lorigo walked into Sen. Ron Johnson’s Capitol Hill roundtable Monday with numbers the corporate press will spend the next week trying to bury.

He represented 212 families in 40 states after hospitals refused to let dying COVID patients try ivermectin while Remdesivir and ventilators rolled on.

Of the 72 cases Lorigo won in which the drug was actually given, only three patients died. That is a 95.8 percent survival rate. Of the 140 cases he lost or could not get into court in time, every single patient died.

[Zachary Foust @ZacharyLoft]

Are the Rothschilds a “trope” or the admins of the server?

[Truth Archive @TheTruthRealm]

She Wasn’t the Widow. She Was the Plan.

[The Rubber Duck ™ @TheRubberDuck79]

🌝 MOON OVER GREENLAND 🌝

what if all of the footage we've seen of the Moon & Mars [that many believe to be fake/staged] - were actually shot in Greenland?

👉🏼 you can follow the coordinates and CONFIRM this yourself.

[Danielle knows a lot @Daniell64334313]

This is why Trump TV.

Because: the lamestream media was constantly lying to you.

***
Here’s a list of like 80 times you guys lied…

“I’m surprised it took this long to ban you… You guys are the worst."

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

Here it is:

🚨Newly hidden FBI documents released by @FBIDirectorKash CONFIRM:

Not only did the FBI stage January 6 five months before it happened while the DNC planned to overthrow the United States government if Trump won, “Provoke a breakdown on January 6 to disrupt the proceedings and prevent the vote from going through.”

But Christopher Wray also had 274 federal agents embedded at the official proceedings of Jan. 6 and had federal agents infiltrating chat rooms months before January 6 orchestrating for the overthrow of the U.S. government.

United States Representative Clay Higgins: VINDICATED

@RepClayHiggins : “Christopher Wray was not only involved in the actions on J6 from within—he had over 200 agents embedded, dressed as Trump supporters, before the doors were even opened.”

“When you track the text threads and the communications within those groups and trace the origins of suggestions of potential violence or an active occupation of the Capitol on January 6, you’ll find that those messages were led by members who turned out to be FBI agents infiltrating the groups. The FBI’s involvement was deep—not just on J6, but in the days, weeks, and months prior.”

[Patrick Byrne @PatrickByrne]

https://t.co/vVKKjJqMiM

[GretchenInOK @GretchenInOK]

I am confident that I am not alone in this!

[Holly Kesler @HollyKesler]

🔥Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has directed the Department of War to prioritize defense of the 2026 elections against foreign interference.

In a Sept. 22 memorandum released Monday, Hegseth instructed U.S. Cyber Command, the National Security Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to treat protection of U.S. election infrastructure as a no-fail mission.

The directive requires those organizations to:
• Prioritize existing intelligence and cyber capabilities so foreign actors cannot meddle in U.S. democratic systems
• Collect and produce intelligence on foreign threats to the elections, consistent with law, regulation, and executive direction
• Use Cyber Command’s existing authorities, in coordination with the Department of Homeland Security, to counter potential cyber threats targeting the elections

“As we approach this election cycle, we must prove that we can and will protect the integrity of our democratic processes from any threat,” the memorandum states.

Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell added that Cyber Command and defense intelligence teams will work with federal, state, and local partners to defend voting systems and expose foreign malign influence while protecting Americans’ fundamental freedoms.

Official sources:

Department of War release: https://t.co/CTwflpKRPa

Memorandum text: https://t.co/qCj536IT6D

[Holly Kesler @HollyKesler]

🚨MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT — FORMAL ELECTION COMPLAINT DROPPED🚨

THIS MORNING, September 28, 2026, I submitted a formal Immediate/Expedited Request for Investigation to the Georgia State Election Board concerning David James Dillie, the Democratic nominee for Georgia House District 161 in the November 3 general election. Official qualifying records identify Dillie as the Democratic candidate for HD-161.

ICYMI, on September 24, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger publicly announced that his office had opened an investigation into reports that a Georgia House candidate allegedly cast ballots in both Georgia’s May 19 primary and Nevada’s June 9 primary. The Secretary of State says investigators will obtain voting records, signatures, and other evidence to determine what happened.

My 27-page complaint and supporting exhibits lay out the records that prompted the request for investigation. The Georgia records included in the complaint show Dillie participated in the Democratic May 19 primary by early in-person voting on April 27 and the Democratic June 16 primary runoff on Election Day.

The Nevada material included in the complaint reflects a June 9, 2026 vote-by-mail entry associated with a Nevada registration bearing the same name and birth date.

In an AJC article, Dillie has denied casting that Nevada ballot and admitted the Nevada address was his former residence, which is precisely why this needs an official investigation—The complaint specifically requests investigation of a potential violation of O.C.G.A. § 21-2-572.

🚨THE INTEGRITY OF OUR ELECTIONS MATTER AND NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
David Dillie isn’t merely a voter whose records raise questions. He is currently asking Georgia voters to elect him to the Georgia House of Representatives. My filing therefore requests expedited review because he is a candidate in the 2026 general election for House District 161.

The complaint and supporting documentation will also be provided to the appropriate Clark County, Nevada election authorities and the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division for whatever review they determine appropriate.

The records deserve answers and the voters of House District 161 deserve the facts!!

[Mel Gibson @_Gibsonmel]

If this doesn’t wake you up
You’re dead inside 👀

[Wiki Leaks 1.0 @WikiLeaksQ]

There was anticipation to see what Julian Assange was going to declassify upon his return to WikiLeaks.
And he hasn't disappointed.
WikiLeaks shows 17 minutes that demonstrate that the 1969 moon landing was filmed in the Nevada desert.
Modern history is a scam.
#Moonlandingfake

[Holly Kesler @HollyKesler]

🚨ELECTION SECURITY — THIS IS WORTH READING.

CISA has released its 2026 Election Infrastructure Security Plan, and there is an important piece of the election-security conversation that should not be overlooked:

AUDITS. PAPER BALLOTS. RECONCILIATION. CHAIN OF CUSTODY.

CISA’s election-security guidance recognizes that protecting an election isn’t simply about cybersecurity. Election resilience includes the ability to verify what happened after the ballots are cast.

CISA guidance addresses:

🔹 Pre- and post-election audits of voting systems
🔹 Post-election tabulation audits
🔹 Risk-limiting audits (RLAs) where permitted under state law
🔹 Manual examination/comparison of paper ballots as part of applicable audit procedures
🔹 Reconciliation and chain-of-custody audits
🔹 Pre-election testing of voting equipment
🔹 Auditing voter-registration systems for anomalies and district assignments
🔹 Cybersecurity and network resilience
🔹 Physical protection of election facilities and ballot-processing locations
🔹 Incident-response and continuity-of-operations planning

One CISA resource puts it plainly:

“Audit the Entire Election Process.”

That is an important concept.

Election security should not end when the polls close or when a machine produces a total. An auditable paper record, reconciliation, documented chain of custody, and meaningful post-election auditing provide ways to independently check election results and identify discrepancies.

And there is an important distinction: CISA’s materials discuss post-election audits and manual ballot examination, including ballot-comparison risk-limiting audits; they should not automatically be read as requiring a full hand count of every ballot. State law determines the specific audit and recount procedures used in each jurisdiction.

As we move through the 2026 election cycle, everyone interested in election administration should read this plan and the supporting materials themselves.

Don’t just read the headline.

Read the procedures. Read the safeguards. Read the audit provisions.

Because cybersecurity matters.
Physical security matters.
And verification matters.

Thank you @SecMullinDHS and @realDonaldTrump

👇 CISA — 2026 Election Infrastructure Security Plan

https://t.co/VE33gJO0Np

[Holly Kesler @HollyKesler]

🗳️IT’S PUBLIC NOW💥
Today in Ware County Superior Court, the double-scanned 2020 ballot evidence finally hit the record!!

Citizen investigator Jeff Fulgham presented the case against the Ware County Board of Elections after state officials refused to investigate. Analyst Phillip Davis — the same researcher credited with identifying 3,000+ confirmed double-scanned ballots in Fulton County — flagged about 150 in Ware.

Same hand-marked ballots. Different batch and ballot numbers. Machine timestamps showing the second scan happened 8 days after the first.

Ware officials told a journalist it was a jam-and-rescan. The timestamps don’t match that story. The evidence is now on record.

The judge let Fulgham put the full presentation on the record. Ware’s attorney was then given the floor…..
No challenge. No contradictory records. No explanation in open court.

The judge said he could not legally compel official answers in that format — then recommended they sit down with Fulgham afterward. They did.

This was never just about one rural county. The voting system is statewide. Fulton is still under investigation. Thousands of similar double scans have already been identified across Georgia from the records that weren’t destroyed.

Excellent work on this case, my friend! @jeffmfulgham — thank you for entrusting me…I was honored to be a part of it! Always defend the integrity of our elections. 🇺🇸

[Jeff Fulgham @jeffmfulgham]

New: Fulgham v Ware County GA Board of Elections was heard in court today in regards to more double scanned 2020 ballots, and evidence was presented which shows the Ware Supervisor of Elections admitted to a journalist that ballots were double scanned. More evidence and the settlement verdict explained below.

First of all I consider the case a win for Election Integrity and transparency. I appreciate Judge Kight not throwing out the case before the evidence could be presented as Ware officials had requested. And I appreciate Judge Muldrew for allowing me to make a full presentation of the evidence which will be public record.

This was a civil lawsuit for information, similar to an open records requests, but more aggressively requesting an explanation of the double scanned ballots identified by analyst Phillip Davis, who successfully identified over 3,000 double scanned ballots in Fulton County as determined by SEB case 2023-025, and over 8,000 statewide from less than half the counties because records were prematurely destroyed.

Davis identified around 150 double scanned ballots (1% of Ware's total) added to the first machine count cast vote record. I presented large billboard images showing the same hand marked ballots, but with different batch and ballot numbers. I showed the machine timestamp which indicates the second scan occurred 8 days after the first. The news article above claims it was a jam and rescan issue, but the scan time evidence does not support that claim.

The news article also claims these double scanned ballots were resolved, but I explained to the court that the machine recount cast vote record is suspiciously missing.

After I made a full presentation of the evidence the Ware attorney was given the opportunity by Judge Muldrew to ask me questions or call his witnesses. He did not do either. They never questioned my findings and they never presented any evidence or records which could contradict my evidence. They had the opportunity to do so before the lawsuit as well, but Ware election officials were never transparent.

The verdict: The question was whether or not I could force them to legally respond. Judge Muldrew explained that he was bound by law and could not legally force them to answer questions in this format. But he offered an informal settlement option, which was to strongly recommend to Ware Election officials to meet with me in a boardroom following the case and to answer my questions.

We entered a private room and I asked several questions for around 10 minutes. I was 100% NOT satisfied with the answers I received from Danny Bartlett (Chairman of the BOE) and Carlos Nelson (Election supervisor). In conclusion I do not believe they personally are guilty of fraud, but I do not believe they know what occurred. It appears to me they were coached by either Dominion Voting techs and or individuals from @GaSecofState office.

In summary we did all we could in this particular case to expose the evidence. I have limited resources and no criminal investigation authority. Recall that Fulgham v Ware was filed because the GASOS/SEB refused in writing to investigate my initial complaint.

Fulton county is still under investigation and I believe that our evidence is relevant because this election system is uniform across the state and there is a clear pattern of evidence in multiple counties.

Always vote. Always defend the integrity of our elections. 🇺🇸