THEY GET THE CAUSATION BACKWARDS, THEY SEE NEW BUILDINGS AND RISING RENTS AND THINK THE NEW BUILDINGS CAUSED THE RISING RENTS BUT ACTUALLY THE RISING RENTS CAUSED THE NEW BUILDINGS, SUPPLY DEMAND IMBALANCE MADE IT MORE PROFITABLE TO BUILD THERE, ALSO WHAT LOOKS LIKE LUXURY ARCHIT
@AndrewCFollett@davidshor This only stops challenges of ballots to the extent that in the case of each ballot the individual voter is attesting that their vote was correctly recorded. If you think those specific ballots are fraudulent, I don't know what to tell you.
@AndrewCFollett@davidshor Reading comprehension. "That has been verified by a voter." This seemingly refers to further challenges after verification. David is talking about analyzing patterns that would lead to investigation, and there is nothing here stopping that.
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism The undecideds? How would you even know yet whether that happened? If it's about young/progs voting later then please reexamine your explanation, that's a very well observed phenomenon across many locations and elections, and probably could solely explain this
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism Bass is very vulnerable to Raman, she's a terrible, and terribly unpopular mayor. She would still beat Pratt by 40 points. Does this sound like the motivation for committing a serious and extremely difficult felony? Just be open to other explanations
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism Younger more progressive voters turn in ballots later, for some reason. And this is just a guess but wouldn't it make sense that undecideds turning in ballots later and breaking for Raman would amplify the effect?
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism Didn't the "democratic machine" endorse Bass pretty uniformly endorse Bass? How did Raman get her supporters in to count votes? I addressed the chatgpt thing in another reply but you're missing how ballot return timing is the variable that explains all of this
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism When a ballot is received is a variable that tells a story in the aggregate about the group of people returning ballots at that time. Undecideds, partisans and different age demos follow observable patterns. Return order of influences count order
@AndrewCFollett@CNLiberalism That he had no chance and that facing Raman is actually worse for Bass should lead you to question your assumptions, rather than believing a chatgpt summary that wasn't aware that different batches of ballots behave differently because they are comprised meaningfully differently
@DeanBaker13 He indicates at the end of the tweet that this is about electability. Biden was infinitely better than trump and lost because of the dynamic Nate is talking about