A list can tell you what to do.
A document can hold what you know.
A map can help you find the structure between the two.
Amethyst Mapper is being built around that practical space between thought and output.
The messy middle of thinking is real.
The idea exists.
The direction is not clear yet.
The structure keeps changing.
The next step depends on seeing the whole picture.
That is exactly where Amethyst Mapper is intended to help.
Waitlist:
https://t.co/Aee3U7qxX1
Question for people who use mind maps:
What usually makes a map useful?
The layout?
The connections?
The speed?
The ability to rearrange ideas?
The way it helps you notice gaps?
We are thinking carefully about what actually matters in visual thinking.
When your notes feel too flat, your plan feels too linear, or your ideas feel too scattered, a map can give the work a shape.
Amethyst Mapper is being built for that shift from scattered thought to usable structure.
Join here:
https://t.co/Aee3U7qxX1
A good thinking tool should not force you to know the answer before you begin.
It should help you explore, connect, rearrange, and notice what matters.
That is the direction behind Amethyst Mapper.
Waitlist:
https://t.co/Aee3U7qxX1
For writers, a map can hold the argument before the draft exists.
For planners, it can hold the moving parts before the task list is clear.
For researchers, it can hold connections before the final structure appears.
Amethyst Mapper is for that early thinking space.
Some projects do not fail because the idea is weak.
They stall because the structure is missing.
Amethyst Mapper is being built for the stage where you need to see the parts, the links, and the next step.
Join the waitlist:
https://t.co/Aee3U7r5Mz
If Amethyst Mapper sounds useful for how you think, plan, write, research, or organize ideas, join the waitlist.
Early updates and access information will go there first.
https://t.co/Aee3U7r5Mz
What makes a mind mapping tool actually useful to you?
Speed?
Simplicity?
Export options?
Beautiful maps?
Low friction?
AI support?
Better organization?
We are listening as Amethyst Mapper moves toward wider access.
You don't have to build alone there are people out there that want to see you succeed check out this post and you will see that there is a community of builders just like you.
We are here for you LET'S GET IT!!
Yeah you're right people want to pay for Codex and Claude because they have the best available on planet models. I also keep my 20$ Codex subscription to use gpt-5.5 for the most important areas of my code base. But I think when I release the v1.0 of my app, I will be able to maintain the code with for example DeepSeek v4 Pro in OpenCode which i really like. Anyway I managed to cut token costs substantially by switching to free models in OpenCode for orchestration and repo management, leaving only heavy coding jobs to Codex.
For writers: a map can hold the article before the article exists.
For researchers: it can hold connections before the argument is clear.
For planners: it can hold moving parts before the plan is fixed.
That is where Amethyst Mapper fits.
I'm wondering when we stop the term vibe coder. Coding is coding.
I'm working on two projects with my pair AI coding agent, and on one project without AI. I'd like to call myself a coder because I know how to code. When I started to use AI in some of my projects, did I become a vibe coder? Also I like to call myself a developer, so should I now place the vibe before it ? Or are vibe coders people who can't code and use AI to code?
I'm genuinely asking, not trying to be a smartass.
Choosing an AI coding assistant in 2026 is about matching the tool to your mental state. You aren't just picking features anymore. You are adopting a completely new workflow rhythm instead.
Use Claude Code when you're stuck on architecture. This tool handles complex logic beautifully. It feels exactly like pair programming with a senior dev. You can bounce ideas around until the project structure makes perfect sense.
Use Codex when you just want to fly through UI components. It prioritizes pure speed above all else. The experience feels like an advanced autocomplete that reads your mind. You will blast through repetitive boilerplate code easily.
Antigravity offers a unique approach for integrated environment workflows. This tool feels like the AI is driving the whole OS. It manages your files and terminal commands while you focus on the big picture.
Beginners often think they need every subscription immediately. You absolutely don't need all three. Start with one tool like Claude to master basic vibe coding logic. You can worry about specialized speed tools later.
✅Your project type should dictate your tool choice.
Which assistant fits your current coding vibe right now?
Hallo @github ! Any human employees there? What kind of bullshit is this ? When you suspend accounts at least tell me why!. And care to reply week old support ticket. You directly postponed release of my software!.
Fuck that I know you won't even bother to reply