यायावर

Human Software Engineer

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

Welll......better to say nothing :)

[Akanksha 🦭 @akanksha7196]

how have some people not dated anybody till their late 20s man, it is kind of a red flag to me

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

Get from your father :)

[Prapti @ewcaliptias]

For those who do not understand how inheritance via in laws work. Wife can only inherit through husband equal to any children they have. So, FILs property, assets shared amongst his children+MIL. Not the spouse of any of his children. So, the myth of women inheriting anything

[Ministry of Culture @MinOfCultureGoI]

This 4,500-year-old terracotta dice from the Indus-Saraswati Civilization is a powerful reminder of India’s living heritage. Dicing is also mentioned as a popular game in Rig and Atharva Vedas (two of the four sacred Vedic scriptures).

From symbols and craftsmanship to rituals, yogic practices, and collective memory, numerous elements of ancient Indian civilization continue to thrive in the daily social and religious life of Indian society across regions and communities.

Civilizational inheritance is not just about geography or ruins, it is defined by living customs, symbols, rituals, and unbroken cultural consciousness. India is the enduring living continuity of the Indus-Saraswati Civilization.

#IndusSaraswatiCivilization #AncientIndianHeritage

[Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian @SubramanianKri]

Did you know that the U.S. defaulted on its sovereign obligations in 1971 when it unilaterally reneged on dollar-gold convertibility.
Russia defaulted in 1998 and 2022.
Argentina: 9 times since independence.
Pakistan: required IMF bailouts 23 times.
Greece defaulted in 2012.
And India? Zero defaults. Not even in 1991!

Yet Western investors classify India as "emerging risk" and call U.S. Treasuries the "risk-free rate."

This isn't risk analysis. This is cognitive bias a la Daniel Kahneman's book "Thinking, Fast and Slow". Humans systematically overweight culturally proximate information while underweighting statistical patterns that don't fit our mental models.

Western strategic planners trust Western partners not because the data supports it, but because the cultural markers feel familiar.

Three facts that challenge everything about how we assess partnership risk:

FACT 1: Across 5,000 years of recorded history, India has rarely waged wars of territorial conquest. Not in 3000 BCE when the Indus Valley Civilization had technological superiority. Not in 1000 CE when Indian mathematics and metallurgy exceeded Europe by centuries. Not in 2026 when it possesses nuclear weapons and the world's 4th-largest military. Not in 2047 when it projects to be a top-two economy.

Compare: China (annexed Tibet 1950, 14 territorial disputes, South China Sea expansion). Russia (Georgia 2008, Crimea 2014, Ukraine 2022). Europe (500 years of colonial conquest across three continents). U.S. (military interventions in 20+ countries since 1945).

This pattern is observable strategic behavior anchored in the Arthashastra, Kautilya's 2,300-year-old treatise arguing that short-term territorial expansion undermines the systemic conditions for sustained prosperity. The concept of "mandala" (circle of states) recognizes that each power's long-term interest depends on system equilibrium.

FACT 2: India has never defaulted on debt, treaties, or security guarantees since independence in 1947. The most revealing test: 1991 balance of payments crisis. Reserves fell to $1.2 billion = just three weeks of imports. Default appeared certain. Instead, India implemented painful reforms, honored every obligation. India didn't use political costs as an excuse to default. Commitments were kept.

This behavior isn't accidental. It's anchored in the Sanskrit concept of ṛṇānubandhaḥ, that obligations are metaphysically binding across time. The Mahabharata established 2,000 years ago that rulers who break commitments violate cosmic order and create systemic instability.

Philosophy became institutional architecture: investment-grade credit through multiple crises, $600B forex reserves (6th globally), zero defaults on government securities across 77 years.

FACT 3: During COVID-19, India exported 300 million vaccine doses to 110 countries while its own vaccination was incomplete. 96 countries received doses free through "Vaccine Maitri."

Meanwhile: U.S. ordered 1.2 billion doses for 330 million people (4x population). EU ordered 4.6 billion for 450 million (10x population). Canada ordered 400 million for 38 million people (10x population).

Western nations didn't begin international distribution until domestic targets were substantially met.

The distinction? India's Economic Survey 2020-21 quoted Sanskrit: "āpadā hi prāṇa rakṣā hi dharmasya prathama aṅkuraḥ" (in calamity, protecting life is the first duty). Not Indian life. Life in general.

This aligns with Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world as one family), not as rhetoric but as policy. India supplies 60% of global vaccines and 20% of generic medicines normally, maintained production during its own constraints, built digital public infrastructure (UPI processes more transactions than all nations combined) and offers it open-source to developing countries.

WHY THIS MATTERS NOW:

Every CFO, sovereign wealth fund, and policymaker is asking: "Who can we depend on for the next 50 years?"

Ukraine shattered the illusion that economic integration prevents aggression. COVID exposed single-source dependencies. Taiwan reveals semiconductor concentration risk.

The global economy is re-optimizing from efficiency to trust.

But here's where Kahneman's research becomes critical: most strategic planners are making decisions using "System 1" thinking (fast, intuitive, pattern-matching based on cultural familiarity) rather than "System 2" thinking (slow, analytical, data-driven assessment of long-horizon behavioral patterns).

The result? Systematic mispricing of partnership risk.

Strategic planners face a choice:

- China: manufacturing efficiency + demonstrated willingness to weaponize interdependence (sanctions on South Korea over THAAD, Australia over COVID inquiry, Lithuania over Taiwan, Belt & Road debt traps in 60+ countries)

- Russia: resource access + repeated weaponization (invaded Ukraine despite economic integration, cut gas to freeze European cities)

- U.S.: innovation + extraterritorial enforcement (billions in fines on European banks for transactions legal in Europe, CLOUD Act overrides local privacy laws, "America First" tariffs hit Canada, Mexico, EU alongside rivals)

- India: 5,000-year track record of territorial restraint + zero defaults + systemic thinking during crises +
challenges (infrastructure gaps, bureaucratic complexity, uneven state capacity).

The question isn't perfection. It is: which risk profile aligns with 50-year partnership objectives when analyzed through System 2 rather than System 1 thinking?

THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH:

If India's pattern suggests lower long-duration risk, why is trust in India still "emerging"?

Kahneman would predict exactly this outcome. Three cognitive biases at work:

1. **Availability bias:** We assess risk based on vivid, recent, culturally proximate information. NATO expansion incorporated Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary rapidly because they registered as "European." India's democracy, rule of law, English-language business environment gets discounted because cultural markers differ.

2. **Confirmation bias:** Western institutions have decades of frameworks built around current partnerships. New data contradicting established models gets filtered out rather than integrated.

3. **Status quo bias:** Existing relationships are comfortable. The U.S.-Europe alliance, U.S.-Japan partnership, Five Eyes intelligence sharing operate with established protocols. Structural change requires crisis-level disruption to overcome inertia.

The crisis arrived.

For boards evaluating long-term partnerships—semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, digital infrastructure, maritime security, critical minerals—India presents a risk profile worth systematic, System 2 analysis.

Because of demonstrated behavior across sufficient time horizons to be statistically meaningful.

In an era of fragmentation, weaponized interdependence, and trust deficits, historical patterns become predictive indicators.

Kahneman spent decades showing that intuitive judgments systematically diverge from statistical reality. Strategic partnership assessment is no exception.

The question is: Are we assessing risk based on data, or based on what feels familiar?

In the 21st century, power matters. But trust may matter more.

And trust should be measured by track record, not by cultural proximity.

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

Safed Maldah laughing in corner 😄

[Bitan Chakraborty @crispeconomiX]

Banganapalli is IITB CSE Gold medalist with Atlassian offer.
Alphonso is Gender Studies graduate of Harvard who throws soup at paintings.

[Striver | Building takeUforward @striver_79]

BJP government in West Bengal.

Didi got 15 years, even after that Kolkata is still in 2000s, is what I will say as a resident.

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

what's wrong in statement?

[NDTV @ndtv]

🔴#BREAKING | "Didn't the girls have any sense" : Congress leader Yashomati Thakur on Maharashtra exploitation case

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

BabaSaheb suicide kar lete apne followers ko dekhe 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

ahhhh...

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

Supreme Court in a divorce case:

Husband’s counsel: separation for 16 years, I am paying 15k maintenance. Kindly grant me divorce.

Wife’s counsel: I have told him I am ready to live with him.

Court: keep your wife with you.

Husband’s counsel: 16 years of separation, there are temperamental issues.

Court: how much permanent alimony can you pay? 15k is hardly anything these days.

Counsel: I don’t have money. I have 65k salary, no pension. I am 54 years old.

Court: you continue to pay 15k.

Counsel: please grant me divorce.

Court: shaanti se baithe raho. Dete Raho 15k, khush raho.

[leyland @leylndd]

me and Claude after we took down prod together

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

👏👏

[खुरपेंच @khurpenchh]

आपके लगातार समर्थन के लिए धन्यवाद रहेगा भाई!

FIR मुक़दमा पेशी से समस्या नहीं है,
खुरपेंच टीम का एक सदस्य इसके लिए डेडिकेटेड है,
हमने fssai को बहुत पहले से हिंट दे रखा है कि हम आपके विभाग के भ्रष्टाचार के विषय में जानते हैं सुधार कर लीजिए,
बजाए उसको सही करने के ये लोग हमारे
ऊपर कार्यवाही करने में लगे हैं।

इनको ये नहीं पता कि हमारे पास अभी इनके कच्चे चिट्ठे हैं ये आए दिन FIR ही कराते घूमेंगे।

इसके बाद GST विभाग की धांधली का नंबर है,
रोक सको तो रोक लो।

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

@darkkcchocolate Give sensible answers to girls -> break up 😄
Just present some illogical, liberal, khayali pulao feel good things -> Happy Scenario 😄😄

[WarMonitor @WarMonitorINTL]

These criminals must face the strictest punishment so such crimes never happen again.

[Omar Abbas Hyat | ഒമർ അബ്ബാസ് @OmarAbbasHyat]

Don’t wanna write essays, but anytime a group demands access to another group’s women as some sort of social justice, just know it’s a huge red flag. Not generalising, but just making an observation.

[biased indian @RakeshK32229480]

I'm fine
Currently outside Faridabad. Don’t worry I have recorded enough content of this city

[यायावर @Deep_Push]

They are trying to do Marathi imposition everywhere. This needs to be stopped.

[Ramdas Athawale @RamdasAthawale]

राम मं��िर बनने का सबने किया स्वागत, अब महाबोधि महाविहार बौद्धों को सौंपने का भी होना चाहिए स्वागत

अयोध्या में भगवान राम के भव्य मंदिर का निर्माण भारत के करोड़ों लोगों की आस्था और विश्वास से जुड़ा विषय था। जब यह सपना साकार हुआ, तब पूरे देश ने उसका स्वागत किया। अलग-अलग विचारधाराओं और धर्मों के लोगों ने भी इसे सकारात्मक दृष्टि से स्वीकार किया, क्योंकि यह करोड़ों हिंदुओं की आस्था और पहचान से जुड़ा प्रश्न था। यह भारत की लोकतांत्रिक परंपरा और धार्मिक सह-अस्तित्व की भावना का प्रतीक भी बना।

उसी प्रकार बिहार के बोधगया स्थित महाबोधि महाविहार पूरी दुनिया के बौद्ध अनुयायियों के लिए सबसे पवित्र ती��्थस्थल है। यहीं भगवान बुद्ध को ज्ञान की प्राप्ति हुई और यहीं से शांति, करुणा और समता का संदेश पूरी दुनिया में फैला। इसलिए यह स्वाभाविक है कि इस पवित्र स्थल के प्रबंधन में बौद्ध समाज की निर्णायक भूमिका हो। यदि राम मंदिर के निर्माण को हिंदू समाज की आस्था के सम्मान के रूप में स्वीकार किया गया, तो महाबोधि महाविहार का प्रबंधन बौद्धों के हाथों में देने की मांग भी उसी सम्मान और समानता की भावना से द���खी जानी चाहिए।

इस विषय का एक महत्वपूर्ण पहलू संवैधानिक अधिकारों से भी जुड़ा है। भारत का संविधान अनुच्छेद 25 और अनुच्छेद 26 के तहत प्रत्येक धर्म को अपनी आस्था का पालन करने और अपने धार्मिक संस्थानों का प्रबंधन करने की स्वतंत्रता देता है। अनुच्छेद 25 नागरिकों को धर्म की स्वतंत्रता प्रदान करता है, जबकि अनुच्छेद 26 धार्मिक संप्रदायों को अपने धार्मिक मामलों का संचालन और संस्थाओं का प्रबंधन करने ���ा अधिकार देता है। ऐसे में यह सवा�� स्वाभाविक है कि जब महाबोधि महाविहार बौद्ध धर्म का सबसे महत्वपूर्ण स्थल है, तो उसके प्रबंधन में बौद्ध समाज को पूर्ण अधिकार क्यों नहीं दिया जाना चाहिए।

वर्तमान में बोधगया मंदिर अधिनियम 1949 के तहत महाबोधि महाविहार के संचालन के लिए एक प्रबंधन समिति बनाई गई है, जिसमें हिंदू और बौद्ध दोनों समुदायों की भागीदारी का प्रावधान है और जिला अधिकारी (DM) को अध्यक्ष बनाया जाता है। समय के साथ यह बहस तेज हुई ��ै कि दुनिया के सबसे पवित्र बौद्ध स्थल के प्रबंधन में बौद्धों की निर्णायक भूमिका होनी चाहिए। जब अन्य धर्मों के प्रमुख धार्मिक स्थलों का संचालन उनके अपने समुदायों के हाथों में होता है जैसे सिखों के लिए गुरुद्वारा प्रबंधक कमेटी या मुसलमानों के लिए वक्फ बोर्ड तो महाबोधि महाविहार के मामले में भी समान सिद्धांत लागू होने चाहिए।

आज आवश्यकता इस बात की है कि इस मुद्दे को किसी विवाद या टकराव के रू��� में नहीं, बल्कि संवैधानिक समानता और धार्मिक सम्मान के दृष्टिकोण से देखा जाए। जिस प्रकार देश ने राम मंदिर के निर्माण को सकारात्मक रूप से स्वीकार किया, उसी प्रकार यदि महाबोधि महाविहार का प्रबंधन बौद्ध समाज को सौंपा जाता है, तो उसका भी स्वागत ��ोना चाहिए। यह कदम न केवल बौद्ध समाज के विश्वास को मजबूत करेगा, बल्कि भारत की धार्मिक स्वतंत्रता और समावेशी लोकतांत्रिक परंपरा को भी और सशक्त बनाएगा।

भारत की असली ताकत उसकी विविधता और परस्पर सम्मान में है। जब हम एक-दूसरे की आस्था और अधिकारों का सम्मान करते हैं, तभी संविधान की भावना मजबूत होती है। इसलिए महाबोधि महाविहार के प्रश्न का समाधान भी उसी संवैधानिक भावना समान अधिकार, धार्मिक स्वतं���्रता और न्याय के आधार पर होना चाहिए।

[ಅಲ್ಪಸಂಖ್ಯಾತ @alpasankhyata]

They just proved marriages are possible without…

Overacting for the camera to create memories ✅
An introvert groom’s embarrassing dance ✅
An overrehearsed bride entry ✅
Making elders rehearse dance for a month✅
Cringe couple photoshoots ✅

[The Redheaded libertarian @TRHLofficial]

The masculine urge to monitor the situation.

[Gurpriya @GurpriyaSidhu]

Men all over the world are 'monitoring the situation' because geopolitics is the olympics of masculine aggression. There is no bigger sporting event for this category.