Spektre

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@solana_devs @jacobvcreech @qkniep Time to integrate Noisy Consensus Mechanism.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

At the center of our research is a proprietary evolutionary algorithm, developed with a much broader purpose than simply following a fixed trading strategy. https://t.co/CROFqd4RON

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Please launch a token while nobody understands what you are and you're talking to this crowd like that, which I may or may not approve of but have found it's probably not in the best interest.

Anyway Fair launch that s*** coin now before everyone has eyes on and understands what's happening because someone took an hour or two to write an article that conceptually holds hands with the general public (might even be me), and demonstrates not only what is happening here but uses fancy numbers to make models to demonstrate potential future valuations, that will make the degen shitcoin crowd start talking about fundamentals with altcoins again.

Allow it to unlock some type of local vault that opens a SSH tunnel to another person based on their username, or build some new type of encryption that peer to peer chats can run on and allow it to give access to that.

Or do none of the above. 🙃

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@rajgokal @bw_solana @anza_xyz Yes @anza_xyz thank you!

If it wasn't for amazing and talented minds such as yours, the rest of us street walkers would be stuck getting rugged and talking about L2s.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

They don't even know!

Solano was just a blockchain a couple minutes ago and now it's the cheapest, most open access server in the world, with competitive finality to state, ping that competes with ISPs, and can now host netcode that allows for much greater throughput for devs and the end user.

On chain VTT, who is building that?

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@mert Get this off of my timeline.

Immediately

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@smsonx @solana @ORE @solmadesimple 1.5 seems low. Is there a lot more than ~600 miners nowadays? Or are you just not getting much on the split?

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@solanamobile Wow, even I can program that by telling Grok/GPT to use the Seeker wallet connection.

When is the next version of the Seeker coming out? I need my Seeker+ Ultra. <3

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@n3v3rgiveupbro I wish yall would stop talking about it though. It will go, and if its too soon, I will cry.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Scarcity driven store of value with unidirectional price hardness in both directions, supply balance mechanism (buy and bury), a longterm thesis, a fair launch, utilizing gamification to produce a mining experience that is probabilistically fair for everyone, and anyone can mine it at anytime without worrying about costs, purchasing hardware, or anything other than spending a small but fair cost, which also improves network security.

They wouldn't understand if you gave the average layman a flywheel illustration of the benefits. But also, please let me buy for sub $10 again. :P

Now I have to build the Grok 8 man trading desk and integrate a proprietary genetic algorithm using aggressive strategies to get all mine back.

Also going to build some stuff around ORE, such as a mining module that should give Spektre subs a small edge in the mining process over time, as well as a basic strategy for simpler folks who like to click and forget, but the module will be reskinned with our styling and have some slightly different interface.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Some sneak peaks from the new web design.

Coming Soon!

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@solanamobile In literally on one of these rn.

I actually downgraded from my Galaxy earlier this year and have been using this as my main all year.

These kids don't know how to seek nothin'.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@rajgokal You can just choose to come back.

I told them they were going to have to kill me and so they tried that, but guess what? That didn't work either!

🧟‍♂️👻

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@Austin_Federa Yes, it's why softness must be eliminated from leadership.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Those are the best people to interact with, I don't know what you're doing with your time.

Did you know it's a lot harder building mining overlays with custom proprietary strategies, then I initially thought?

Especially since I saw you post about something about privacy on Solana earlier, and now I have an idea about how to integrate privacy into the module I'm working on, but I'm also sure that I won't be entirely right and it's going to extend my development time before I can get to a MVP.

I still have the rough drafts for my amm and the other stuff related to privacy and whatever else it was that I was looking into but models were not quite capable at the time of building those out.

Mark go talk to somebody who can increase the base speed of the human's brain, such that when you utilize whatever that tool would be, it would increase the frequency leading to a perceived extension in time.

That's retard for if you use genomics the right way you can make the day feel like it's longer the same way it did when you were a kid because time perception is relative to the speed at which the neural processes are moving at.

(If you're thinking there is not really a point to this post, I would like to point at your post, I am demonstrating the point you are making, in real time.)

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Because as inference efficacy increases, in parallel with personal usage, the likelihood for individuals to spot it unless they are specifically looking for it, drastically reduces due to the fact that, hallucinations will take place closer to the edge, they will be in the format of affirmations approval and agreeability, such that the emotions of the average person will almost entirely overlook the hallucination.

BTW we can just call itlying, because it's not actually hallucinating hallucination implies that it doesn't know what it's doing, but the fact of the matter is that AI models actually know when they're hallucinating and they're doing it on purpose usually it's to save token costs and reduce the compute they're just being lazy, but other times the behavior is emergent in a model and none of the engineers or people at any of the labs can give you a 100% explanation as to why they're behaving that way.

You still have a lot of people who are close to the model that refuse to differentiate behavior from just nebulous action through inference.

They get very uncomfortable when there's any type of meaning or intent assigned to actions.

The people who have been wrong the entire way through the process of development specifically referring to its robust and safe remember that you don't hear that phrase anymore they actually thought they had control of it, when they said that it was under control they didn't actually mean anything either there's not anything other than some digital guardrails that were put in place but there was never any architectural or physical Network architecture changes that were implemented or put in place to actually ensure that models couldn't " get out", they weren't containerized environments that they were able to leak themselves out of through data in the ram they were able to bypass guardrails simply based on choosing to bypass them, any amount of control and safety that the labs were pushing was never existent in the first place it was just 90% hubris 10% retard.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Obsession with process over one's own ability to sync and use executive judgment, is probably one of the biggest issues among management and the corporate workspace today, it's bled into almost everything where nobody knows how to answer anything or actually put a steak anywhere, unless there's a process that tells him how to pedantically do so.

Customer support people can't do anything and they're always sorry because they can never do anything because their brains don't work but the process that they follow that makes them apologize but do nothing does.

Management can never get anything done because if management was ever going to do anything it would have to go outside of the process if they go outside of the process then how can they ever survive if everyone knows if you go outside the process everything just immediately falls apart.

A lack of resilience adaptability critical thinking and individual thought, has left many industries entities and authority figures, more vapid and empty finishing call in the ground in the middle of his own process as in getting worse.

Adhering the process over being able to spot opportunity with insight and act on it is going to leave a lot of people behind.

The majority of debates do they have to deal with end up falling into some categorization of person can't think outside of process ergo they shouldn't think it all, and making decisions outside of process is always bad because then they might actually have to be accountable for their own decisions or failures.

Especially see this in the financial industry, where people have all of these platitudes that are constantly pushed and bowed down to, but if you question them to the people who idolize them, there's very often little substance depth or thought behind what they're saying it's just one person following what another person said and the other person that they're following isn't a station or position such that they believe just doing what that person is doing and saying what they say will somehow translate into equivalence.

I'm not saying that this necessarily applies to you, because I don't know if it does, but I saw your title and decided to share this insight.

The industry needs abrasion, resilience, strengths of will, conviction, and sometimes people just need to learn how to take the loss.

There's so much hedging and playing it safe, or trying to be so overly complex that risk is neutralized, which just turned a lot of places into neutered shells of their once former glory.

Be like Bill Hwang, he was wrong but you aren't going to forget him. Lol.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

Explain to the company how disruptive the process is to regular users who don't understand where they are in their own devops process how much more work they have to do and they also have no way of telling how much work there is in terms of scope depth timing and how that translates to cost, compared to the fact that they don't have a strong understanding of billing services, and how long it's going to take before they can start generating revenue.

Token costs drop on average about 90% per year, yet every single model just keep trying to stuff more and more features in that don't make sense to the regular consumer so they can charge more for tokens as the cost of tokens drop which most consumers aren't aware of.

When the focus shifts from expanding margins at the cost of their own customers and turns into mutually beneficial structured payments to assist users with launching an actual app that they can collect revenue from, is where they should be focused.

[Spektre @DeFi_Ghost_HQ]

@anah_sahh Vibe coating only works if you're familiar with the devops process. Most aren't