76% of stablecoins ($232B) earn nothing.
Building @YieldoHQ to fix that — scored DeFi yield in every wallet.
Consultant → crypto fund → founder. #WAGMI.
Spending the evening at Pudgy VIP Night durino WebX Japan with @pudgypenguins@PenguAsia and @AvaxTeam1. Supported bv @avli jo and @MiuroAl
An evening of good food, exclusive merch, and meaningful conversations.
Tokyo vibes are strong! ⛩️
DeFi doesn't have a yield problem.
It has a trust problem.
$232B in stablecoins sit idle on-chain. $10B/year in missed yield. Hundreds of yield products.
Yet, users can't evaluate them properly.
That's why we exist.
Thanks @Cointelegraph for this great piece 🙏
https://t.co/6XcP6ayzLd
The platform that scores DeFi vaults got its own contracts reviewed. That's how it should work. 🔐
@YieldoHQ rates yield vaults across four dimensions: Capital, Performance, Risk, and Trust. On-chain data, no listing fees, no pay-to-rank. Built for wallets, depositors, and anyone choosing where to put yield-bearing capital.
Hashlock reviewed the contracts. Findings addressed. Secure rating issued.
📘 Full audit: https://t.co/L1InhPe1AV
🌐 https://t.co/6I1BEwuUAM
Loss prevention is a higher-value product than yield optimization for most DeFi users.
The user who earned 12% APY for 18 months and then lost 25% in an exploit is not a success story. They're net negative.
But the product roadmap across most of DeFi is entirely oriented toward the first number — not the second.
The market gap isn't a better yield aggregator. It's a loss prevention layer.
Hot take: wallets will not be the primary interface for DeFi's next 100M users.
Those users are already on Revolut. Robinhood. Banking app.
Apps they trust, understand, and open daily.
If those apps start routing idle balances into DeFi yield on the backend — while showing users a simple savings rate — wallets become invisible infrastructure.
The last mile isn't whoever holds the keys.
It's whoever owns the UX.
The infrastructure gap in DeFi right now is this: almost everything is aggregation pretending to be curation.
Until you know which one you're looking at, treat every yield list as a starting point — not a recommendation.
Why this matters: aggregation gives you options.
Curation helps you interpret the options and decide.
Depositing into an aggregated list is research work you still have to do. Depositing into a curated list means someone already did it.