Oro

@Deisediamond

Humanity City.

Joined April 2010

619 Following

91 Followers

4.6K Posts

Pinned Tweet

Oro @Deisediamond

over 1 year ago

@TheNotoriousMMA #ReplacementMigration @JDVance @Elon

250

Deisediamond retweeted

Buddy @BuddyGoingAWalk

9 days ago

@realstewpeters The follow up from today's show by @AnaEscobarShow is well worth the watch too. The swamp is thick https://t.co/5ZcgWVjA1A

Deisediamond retweeted

Asdfghjklzx @asdffhjklzx

9 days ago

@realstewpeters @AnaEscobarShow The CENTCOM/Brad Cooper link has me sick. As well as Hegseth's plane doing a flyover of Energetic Systems building explosion. Harpole, Davis and Kolvet. Get these fuckers.

185

Deisediamond retweeted

Rubbish Wrangler

@RubbishWrangler

9 days ago

@realstewpeters #AlarmingSearches #45 #47 #MAGA Not to speculate why one military escort is using Google images looking for DIA James Adam’s ? Persons of interest in small shaped charges. Leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

RubbishWrangler's tweet photo. @realstewpeters #AlarmingSearches

#45 #47 #MAGA
Not to speculate why one military escort is using Google images looking for DIA James Adam’s ? Persons of interest in small shaped charges.

Leading up to Charlie Kirk’s assassination. https://t.co/YNlzTVBqMJ

Who to follow

Chrissy Ward-McAlpin

@Simplicity1277

I’m a nurse and a mother of 4 (2 boys 2 girls)…My two youngest have Autism. I love Tattoos, the outdoors and a true crime junky…Always Searching for the Missing

Dani

@DanikaTabico

Made an account only to follow the Gabby case and the search for #BrianLaundrie. Love animals, nature, books, and true crime ✌️

Sharon g

@sgarofalo03

Deisediamond retweeted

Bel Esprit

@teenieweenie20

9 days ago

@realstewpeters The ATF ballistics lab essentially testified that Tyler Robinson's rifle did NOT fire the fatal round that killed Charlie Kirk. https://t.co/SNggMkwcGf

125

Oro @Deisediamond

8 days ago

@Cand

Stew Peters @realstewpeters

9 days ago

You can't explain this away. These are documented patterns of high-level people being visually identified by Fort Huachuca-based personnel in the weeks and days leading straight into September 9, 2025. Let’s walk through it chronologically, person by person.

249

243K

Deisediamond retweeted

GnosticAlchemist0

@gnosticmind00

9 days ago

@AndrewKolvet @Mini_111111 @lisachristinect @baroncoleman You won’t be able to innocently explain away everything that was revealed on Stew Peters tonight. I’d love to see you spin this one. I’ll give you a hint- new Fort Huachuca meeting confirmation.

307

16K

Deisediamond retweeted

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

@DiligentDenizen

9 days ago

Prosecutor's timeline has a MAJOR PROBLEM in the Tyler Robinson Charlie Kirk case 👀 If Tyler is in Panguich he can't be watching the cops in Orem, & can't know about the dogs unless he's watching the cops in Orem. Means text messages are fake. Means the confession is fake.

211

286

79K

Deisediamond retweeted

theleahfiles

@leahfiles

9 days ago

Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time. First up, Tyler Bowyer. Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities. Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like: 1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run.... 2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do. 3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for. 4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides. 5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings. 6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity. 7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit. The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design. I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books. Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you. They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention. Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?

$leahfiles's tweet photo. Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time. First up, Tyler Bowyer. Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities. Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like: 1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run.... 2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do. 3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for. 4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides. 5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings. 6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity. 7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls. WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit. The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design. I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books. Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you. They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention. Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?$

361

627

77K

Oro @Deisediamond

8 days ago

RT @CharlotteLee_88: 🚨🚨🚨Guys read @D24799035’s post below. I’ve had this photo of him for a while from his Instagram. Was there some…

Deisediamond retweeted

Dö @D24799035

9 days ago

MEET TRAVIS GUINTA!! ERIKA FRANTZVES STEP BROTHER!! AKA THE MAN IN THE STAIRWELL AT UVU ON 9/10/2025!!!!!! 🤯🤯🤯 MAKE THIS SHIT GO VIRAL!!!!!!

617

13K

756K

Deisediamond retweeted

Ian

@Iwendtster

12 days ago

*I am not sulcldaI. I recently had a life insurance policy taken out and qualified “elite” in health. I have never taken drugs in my life except for the adderral I am prescribed going on almost 20 years now. I do not drink alcohol and my relationship with my wife and kids is phenomenal. I am VERY happy and fulfilled in life and have never once ever considered taklng my own Ilfe.* I am also not accusing anyone of anything with this post but merely raising questions as a private citizen concerned with knowing the truth. Everything is a matter of opinion and not fact with the exception of the photo taken and audio message sent. Those are factual. This is the last picture taken and it was taken by Mikey McCoy. Everyone should be asking why. Especially since it was right before he looked at Dan flood and right after he looked at him again and almost 5 seconds before Charlie was klIIed. Share this far and wide. We should also be asking why he is reaching out to married women old enough to be his mother and speaking this way. So many questions and so many things don’t add up. But as many have believed since the beginning, Mikey might be the key to this whole thing.

19K

350K

Deisediamond retweeted

theleahfiles

@leahfiles

14 days ago

Ben Shapiro wasn’t on my radar but he is now…..

710

10K

190K

12 days ago

13 days ago

More conflicting “evidence” in the Tyler Robinson case…..If this continues they’re just gonna Epstein him because it’s so obvious they are framing him.

761

179

14K

Deisediamond retweeted

Jim Roberts

@JimRobe30722278

13 days ago

More conflicting “evidence” in the Tyler Robinson case…..If this continues they’re just gonna Epstein him because it’s so obvious they are framing him.

761

179

14K

12 days ago

13 days ago

Amen sister! This response to @AndrewKolvet is pure gold. WE ALL WANT TO KNOW WHY!

826

114

21K

Deisediamond retweeted

Candace Owens

@RealCandaceO

13 days ago

Trust the science!

31K

Deisediamond retweeted

Stew Peters @realstewpeters

12 days ago

Flock Cameras Were All Over the Charlie Kirk Assassination Site — So Why Does the Official Story Still Stand? By 2025 Provo & Orem were blanketed with Flock cameras around UVU. But prosecution only shows grainy photos with zero license plate hits.

111

218

67K

Deisediamond retweeted

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

@DiligentDenizen

13 days ago

‼️🇺🇸: LANCE TWIGGS BUSTED LYING UNDER OATH ON DAY 1 👀 Lance Twiggs testified Tyler Robinson only contacted him ONCE at 11pm the day Charlie Kirk was taken out. Prosecution's OWN texts evidence show Tyler texted at 4:30PM He's OBVIOUSLY LYING, can't keep his story straight 🤨

590

156

58K

Deisediamond retweeted

Stew Peters @realstewpeters

14 days ago

They’re already priming the public to accept Tyler Robinson being taken out. The prosecution’s case is collapsing in real time during preliminary hearings — before the trial has even started. This is how they set the stage for the next chapter of the Charlie Kirk cover-up.

324

556

138K

Deisediamond retweeted

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@BasedSamParker

13 days ago

So lemme get this straight: Lance Twiggs's DNA was on the towel & screwdriver; Lance has the same pair of converse as Tyler; Lance has access to the Discord and Tyler's computer; Lance allegedly "found" the confession note (which no longer exists) from an 11 PM automated/scheduled text from a Tyler (lolololol); and now we also find out the dremel that Tyler allegedly used to engrave the bullets was Lance's?! Did I hear that right? Oh, and Lance also said that Tyler NEVER TALKED ABOUT CHARLIE KIRK. 🤯😭 Will someone please tell me how this can't be interpreted as a frame job? Lol

456

15K

744K

Oro

@Deisediamond

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users