The California Association of Realtors has just replaced 'landlord' with 'housing provider' and 'tenant' with 'renter/resident' in their official forms to be more 'inclusive.'
What a pathetic, spineless capitulation to the DEI cult. They are erasing basic language that’s been around for centuries. Next they’ll call rent 'housing equity payments.'
You are suppose to take care of your own parents, not the parents of every other person. You obviously have a problem with the English language. You meant to say that you are a socialist. It also it is clear that you do not own income property, as your position would dramatically change.
"Rent stabilization" is a lie. Nothing is stabilized—it’s just a scam where new tenants are forced to subsidize the old. Where’s the fairness? Kill the ordinances, end the socialism, and let the market decide what rent actually costs. 🏴☠️📈 #RentControl#FreeMarket#HousingCrisis
Remember, there will be a show this Saturday, May 30th, at 3pm. The opening topic: "Common Mistakes By New Landlords".
Details at: https://t.co/1lD00tHZUK
Zoom Landlord-Tenant Talk Radio just got easier to use: you can now search topics inside our video library and jump straight to what you need. Explore here:
https://t.co/fYtm3s1zY6
My latest video is now live. Landlords should come together to oppose California Assembly Bill 2042, which would allow tenants to seek to set aside a judgment by simply asserting they were not served—without requiring proof.
https://t.co/dfkZniWV1Y
@BlakeTalin In that situation, I would suggest not taking a partial payment. In this way, you’ll be able to commence an eviction after the first month..
This is the harsh reality for a landlord with property in an unincorporated area of Los Angeles County. The tenancy commenced in April, 2026. The rent is $2495 per month for a 2 bedroom. The tenant stops paying rent for May. Based on the County law, the landlord cannot start the eviction unless the amount owed exceeds $5202. This means the landlord will need to wait until July, 2026 to commence an eviction. This is a theft of property rights.
This is a call for action. We must defeat AB 2042 by contacting your State Senator and urging a No Vote.
I will be discussing this on the next edition of Zoom Landlord-Tenant Talk Radio, this Saturday at 3pm. Details at: https://t.co/1lD00tHZUK
Just when you thought it could not get worse for landlords, our State Legislators are proposing AB 2042. This statute, if it passes, will allow tenants to set aside any judgment, unless they were personally served. The tenant, even though properly served by other means, can just declare that the lawsuit was never received and the judgment will be set aside. Immediately write an email to your State Senator and urgent a no vote on this bill. You can find you representative by this link:
https://t.co/ltaqW8Aq5O
Outstanding result by Payman Taheri in our recent trial against the Basta Group. A unanimous 12-0 jury verdict for the plaintiff reflects the hard work and dedication Payman brings to every case. Congratulations on this win.
We are proud to announce that Souren Safrazbekian has joined our firm as an associate. Souren brings a deep expertise in Landlord-Tenant law and will be a valuable addition to our litigation team. Welcome to the firm, Souren! #NewHire#LegalNews#Litigation
Are you a California landlord? Don’t miss this Saturday’s Zoom Landlord Tenant Talk Radio at 3pm! 🎙️
We’re breaking down the "Top 10 Questions CA Landlords Ask Their Attorneys (2026 Guide)."
Details at: https://t.co/fRclHwePH5