@moondaepop i’ll end the discussion here because you bring up about obligations solely based on gender because that is what it says in your book, while i speak for woman as an individual
Padahal ini juga ada loh di alquran, sebagaimana anak perempuan yg belum nikah semua di tanggung oleh sang Ayah, paman (kalo yatim), saudara lelaki kalo punya.. dan saat nikah pun di tanggung oleh pasangan nya harus seperti ayah nya mengasihi dia sebelum nikah.. bahkan suami tidak berhak memakai uang sepersen pun dari warisan sang istri.. apa bila istri membantu, suami wajib mengganti uang/harta tersebut sesuai nominal.. surat an-nisa sudah menjelaskan secara detail padahal..
@moondaepop shift the talk where 🤦🏻��️ and u keep saying im projecting as if u know me in person 😭 its a harmful idea because the outcome is being proved damaging, its weaken women’s independence. women can live by their own without having to be provided by men. thats where i always stand, no?
@moondaepop sooooo you’re aware and agree in practice most men only doing it to gain control over women? hence its a harmful idea to be spread because at the end of the day, you know it yourself, its just a tool for men to play with their ego. and we can unlearn it anytime.
@moondaepop it clearly says men (not just someone) have to provide everything for you, so without them, you’ll have nothing and wont able to stand with your own. so basically you’re dependent on them, and they have control over you, how is that not harmful?
@ousksksisiwo who is thinking women are weak? the idea that women needs to be provided by their father/uncle/male cousin before they have husband which means men maybe? where feminism advocates for women’s indepence so they can stand by their own? idk you tell me
td nya mau ngomong kyknya kalo next role inde dapet character kyk andy sachs w lompat, tp setelah dipikir2 what makes andy giving puppy krn matanya anne hathaway 😭😭😭