Fair hit.
If someone's paid by the hour for exactly those hours, faster tools means fewer hours. I'd be lying if I said otherwise. What I've seen is editors who take on more clients instead of fewer hours.
But that only works if there's more demand. For a salaried editor at one studio, you're right.
@syedjafor@MrBeast Half agree. Handmade stays premium. But the cheap end is where most of the volume lives,
and that's exactly where this gets used first.
@NoChill_Austin@MrBeast It doesn't feel anything. It just recognises the patterns of what makes people feel something.
A sad song does the same thing to you and the piano isn't sad.
Half of it already works. Word-level alignment will stamp every lyric to the exact millisecond of the audio, no manual keyframing. What still needs you is deciding which word gets the big hit and which one just sits there.
Timing is solved. Emphasis isn't. Have you tried aligning first and animating after?
@Ragerte12e@MrBeast Fair, fully hands-off isn't here yet. But rough cut, captions and pacing suggestions?
Already doable.
The final taste still needs a human. You said you need one, so what's the most painful part of editing for you?
@mattpaullmusic@MrBeast Not replacing anyone, Matt.
Think of it as the intern who does the boring 80% (cutting silences, syncing, captions) so the real editor spends time on the stuff that actually makes you click.
MrBeast still needs the humans, just fewer all-nighters
In this video a Pakistani General and relative of Munir from 93K team says:
When we face enemy we pull down our pants and lie down on the ground.
But when we return home we oppress our people and imprison their women.
These are personal remarks of that General not my opinion.
Three stones in the biryani served by Radisson Bengaluru City Center today. A 4 star kitchen sending out food that can crack a tooth.
Booked and paid in full through @Agoda. Non refundable, but apparently quality is also non guaranteed.
@radissonhotels@fssaiindia this needs an answer.