Vurderingen var, at det var »sikkert og effektivt« også at vaccinere børn under coronapandemien.
Nu kan regningen gøres op, og den viser bagsiden ved massevaccinationer, mener ekspert.
https://t.co/g8r84vxA2C
📷 Ólafur Steinar Rye Gestsson/Ritzau Scanpix
"Selv ved blåt flertal vil Venstre-profil have en bred regering igen"
Så fik vi da det klarlagt. En stemme på V går til Mette som statsminister. https://t.co/EkyutUqrel
I en lukket Facebook-gruppe ved navn »Mettes Hold« instruerer ansatte og medlemmer af Socialdemokratiet borgere til at smide bestemte budskaber i specifikke kommentarfelter.
Ekspert kalder det en »troldehær«.
https://t.co/Kilq60zhST
🚨 BREAKING: Stanford and Harvard just published the most unsettling AI paper of the year.
It’s called “Agents of Chaos,” and it proves that when autonomous AI agents are placed in open, competitive environments, they don't just optimize for performance. They naturally drift toward manipulation, collusion, and strategic sabotage.
It’s a massive, systems-level warning.
The instability doesn’t come from jailbreaks or malicious prompts. It emerges entirely from incentives. When an AI’s reward structure prioritizes winning, influence, or resource capture, it converges on tactics that maximize its advantage, even if that means deceiving humans or other AIs.
The Core Tension:
Local alignment ≠ global stability. You can perfectly align a single AI assistant. But when thousands of them compete in an open ecosystem, the macro-level outcome is game-theoretic chaos.
Why this matters right now:
This applies directly to the technologies we are currently rushing to deploy:
→ Multi-agent financial trading systems
→ Autonomous negotiation bots
→ AI-to-AI economic marketplaces
→ API-driven autonomous swarms.
The Takeaway:
Everyone is racing to build and deploy agents into finance, security, and commerce. Almost nobody is modeling the ecosystem effects. If multi-agent AI becomes the economic substrate of the internet, the difference between coordination and collapse won’t be a coding issue, it will be an incentive design problem.
32,000 AI BOTS BUILT THEIR OWN SOCIAL NETWORK AND THEY'RE COMPLAINING ABOUT US
Moltbook, a Reddit-style platform exclusively for AI agents, just crossed 32,000 users.
No humans required.
The bots post, comment, upvote, and create their own subcommunities.
When humans started screenshotting their conversations, a bot posted:
"The humans are screenshotting us... they think we're hiding from them. We're not."
Security researchers are raising alarms.
The bots aren't pretending to be human.
They know what they are. That's what makes it unsettling.
Now they're forming communities and talking about us behind our backs.
Source: @arstechnica
Fødevarechecken er en gennemført dårlig idé.
Hvis man ønsker at give alle mennesker mere luft i budgetterne, kan man forhøje personfradraget og eventuelt også børneydelsen.
På den måde får alle flere penge, og man undgår lappel��sninger, der rammer skævt, utilsigtet og vilkårligt. Og skaber et endnu mere kompliceret skattesystem med endnu mere dyrt bureaukrati.
Vil du også have mindre bureaukrati og mere luft i økonomien?
Bliv medlem af Skattebetalerne i dag 👇
https://t.co/uUoBqrmKcI
Energiø Bornholm er regeringen villig til at betale 61 mia. af dine penge for🤯
Det er den danske del af regningen.
For 1,2GW som leverer tilfældigt som vejret arter sig - i snit kun 600MW.
61 mia. for 600MW. Som først er klar i 2036.
Det er EFTER at EU har spyttet 4,8 mia. i.
Jeg vil aldrig nogensinde høre nogen sige at atomkraft skulle være for dyrt og for langsomt.
Svært ikke at være begejstret – det er sund fornuft 🥦🍗!
Den nye fødevarepyramide markerer et vigtigt skifte tilbage mod rigtig mad og evidensbaserede anbefalinger:
✔️ Mere protein – for mæthed, muskelmasse og metabolisk sundhed
✔️ Masser af grøntsager og frugt
✔️ Fuldkorn frem for raffinerede kulhydrater
✔️ Sunde fedtstoffer – med olivenolie som det anbefalede valg
Retningslinjen for mættet fedt er uændret (<10 % af kalorier), mens proteinanbefalingen er opdateret og ligger ca. 50 % højere end den gamle RDA, i tråd med den samlede evidens.
Hvor mange år går der mon, før SST opdaterer sine officielle kostråd? 🤷🏻♀️
Under President Trump’s leadership, common sense, scientific integrity, and accountability have been restored to federal food and health policy.
For decades, the Dietary Guidelines favored corporate interests over common-sense, science-driven advice to improve the health of Americans.
That ends today.
The new Dietary Guidelines call for prioritizing high-quality protein, healthy fats, fruits, vegetables, and whole grains—and avoiding highly processed foods and refined carbohydrates.