Dev

[Dev @Dev973z]

@robkies_art @TomFulp -borderline abusive ex. Especially when he’s been friends with the guy for 20 years. Some friend that is.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@robkies_art @TomFulp -Tom’s actions all the more dumber. Anyone with half a brain knows that you keep quiet and keep it close to your chest when you are pursuing legal action, you’d think at Tom’s age he’d know that, rather than side with the mob that were being led by a toxic, vindictive, horrible-

[Dev @Dev973z]

@Alanxander69 @facc6400 @SpangIeDangIe @NPC00767480 Both by Mika and that weird, creepy Nathan guy

[Dev @Dev973z]

@NPC00767480 @SpangIeDangIe She was over 17, a year and a half over the age of consent there, not 16, that other guy is lying about that for some reason. He was in his early 20s and it was 13 years ago. All legal so no real significance. It would be more significant if it happened recently at his age now.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift -in age to himself. So I wouldn’t say he’s too inept to have a grown up relationship seeing as he’s had a few since. I do think though that he has had an awful choice of partners in recent years who aren’t very mature themselves, but that’s neither here nor there.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift -the type of people on that show being Chris’ fitting Chris’ MO, keep in mind that this was a one time, legal thing that happened 13 years ago, no one is the same person after 13 years, and we know that every relationship he’s had in the years since have been with someone close-

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift If you’re talking morals then I can concede. But there absolutely is a legal defence so I don’t know what you’re talking about. What he did was legal, people are saying it is illegal, which is false. Why do you not think there’s any defence in that case?

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift Except in all those cases the perpetrators all thought they were meeting up with a 13 y/o 14 y/o 15 etc, not a 17 y/o in a state where the age of consent is 16, that never happened in that show so it’s a false equivalency.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift -it was just a moral question. Saying it’s morally wrong is fine. But people were saying it was illegal. Which it is not, there’s no even arguing that

[Dev @Dev973z]

@DoctahDetroit @KungTerry4real @WispSwift But that’s not what the guy I replied to said? He said "defamation is when you say true things about my content creator and I dont like it" which is not what people are saying, that is strawmanning. And I’ve said from the start that I would not be arguing with people if-

[Dev @Dev973z]

@JermSeventy @KungTerry4real @WispSwift -be Nathan, because in his video his explicitly stated that nothing illegal happened and that wasn’t the issue. His issue was how Chris acted/treated her. If his video is still up then that explains why it isn’t deleted, might not be defamation on his part

[Dev @Dev973z]

@JermSeventy @KungTerry4real @WispSwift Might be difficult. But Mika in particular kept saying that they were going to the police and that what he did was illegal, definitely implying stat-rape, I think she would be the easiest to prove lying and malicious intent etc, I think the only one completely in the clear would-

[Dev @Dev973z]

@IBITCHFUCKER66I @AlexiosThe1st @JohnnyUtahNG *17, and they are baseless if the accusations are grooming and stat-rape. If everyone was just saying that it was lame or morally wrong then I wouldn’t argue otherwise, but they were taking about going to the police, Mika and the mob here were saying it was grooming/stat-rape etc

[Dev @Dev973z]

@rorirat @AlexiosThe1st @JohnnyUtahNG The accusations are grooming and stat rape. They are literally false lol. No one now denies that he had a legal, consensual relationship with someone a year and a half over the age of consent 13 years ago when he was in his early 20s, but the accusations are false. It was legal.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@bussydestryuh @WispSwift How so? He literally did not break any of the laws that you all were accusing him of lol. As far as legal action everyone is assuming that he’s handing out lawsuits, which if true is surely for defamation? What else would it be for.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@KungTerry4real @WispSwift -terms of common sense. This btw is DEFINITELY defamation. I think you creating weak arguments out of thin air so you can easily counter them just shows your character. That’s an awful habit you have that won’t help you in life. You’ve been wrong about this entire thing.

[Dev @Dev973z]

@KungTerry4real @WispSwift You’re using strawman arguments again because you know you can’t argue against the real points/arguments people are making lol. The relationship was legal, he was accused of grooming, stat-rape and pedophilia, which is all false, both in the eyes of the law and just in-