The most unfortunate thing is that the party that has repeatedly sought votes in the name of Hindutva is in power at the Centre for the third consecutive time. Yet, under one baseless pretext or another, it remains silent and continues to tolerate abuses directed at Hindutva, Sanatan Dharma, and the Prime Minister of the country, seemingly in an attempt to become the biggest benefactor of those who hurl such abuses.
No sir, you are completely wrong here.
This is precisely how civilisations surrender their intellectual inheritance: first you are told a text is irrelevant, then that defending it is regressive, and finally that the respectable thing to do is quietly abandon it.
Today it is Manusmriti. Tomorrow someone will drag a few verses out of the Ramcharitmanas and tell us Tulsidas has accumulated too much historical baggage to be defended. The day after that, someone will cherry-pick passages from the Vedas and demand that we distance ourselves from them as well.
Where exactly does this logic stop?
The Corpus Juris Civilis, compiled under Emperor Justinian I in the sixth century, belongs to a world radically different from modern Europe. Nobody argues that every provision in it should govern twenty-first-century society. Yet Roman law remains an object of serious study across universities because it is part of the intellectual ancestry of modern legal systems.
Civilised societies do not preserve old texts because they agree with every sentence in them. They preserve them because they refuse to become historical orphans.
I am not arguing that every injunction in Manusmriti must become law today. I am arguing against this astonishing proposition that once political activists have successfully demonised an ancient Indian work, Hindus themselves should concede the battlefield and announce: “Fine, this book is irrelevant anyway.”
Absolutely not.
Our Manishis produced an enormous civilisational corpus. Vedas, Upanishads, Dharmashastras, Itihasas, Puranas, philosophical schools, commentaries and countless other works. They should be read, preserved, debated, contextualised, criticised where necessary, and defended against dishonest caricature.
We cannot allow our relationship with our own intellectual heritage to be dictated by whoever shouts the loudest against it.
If its popular image has been constructed through selective quotations, polemics, mistranslations or political campaigns, then challenging that image is exactly what scholarship is supposed to do. History is not a public-relations verdict that becomes permanently binding once enough activists repeat it.
A civilisation that becomes embarrassed by its books every time someone attacks them will eventually be left with no books worth defending and no civilisation worth inheriting.
Rahul Gandhi is defaming Hinduism by restricting Hinduism to "Manusmriti" by taking few texts out of it?
We as whole Indic Civilization foundation is not based on that one book& why target Hinduism?
RSS-BJP is Uniting divided Hindus of Indic civilization against divisions. It doesn't mean RSS-BJP is answerable to hindu scriptures
@vivekagnihotri A weak argument!
Why are Hindus getting targeted for a book that is not even practiced whereas Bible and Quran, that are practiced by billions blindly, not part of the discussion.
B'cos: Rahul Gandhi is a fraudster dividing the society for political gains. Boycott his nonsense.
𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗦 𝗜 𝗗𝗜𝗗𝗡’𝗧 𝗞𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗕𝗘𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝟮𝟬𝟭𝟰:
𝟭) There’s something called 𝗛𝗔1𝗔𝗟𝗔 too in Mùś1ím communities. That even her uncles, brothers could perform this in their families? Never heard of it before.
𝟮) Gandhi had STOPPED Hïndüs from any retaliatory action against Mùś1ímš in India in 1947 & Gandhi & Nehru asked Mùś1ímš not to migrate to Pakistan despite the ATROCIT1ES Hindus had suffered during Partition.
𝟯) Refugee Hïndüs were STOPPED to claim rights over vacant Mùś1ím properties in India despite losing all their wealth & properties in Pakistan.
𝟰) Gandhi refused to ask the British Auth for FORGIVENESS for Bhagat Singh.
𝟱) Savarkar’s mercy petitions to the British were written in the context of the political circumstances of that time, and at the BEHEST OF Gandhi.
𝟲) BRITISHERS left India after they realised that thy wont be able to fight 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗛𝗔𝗦𝗛 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗥𝗔 𝗕𝗢𝗦𝗘 and the INA along w many true FREEDOM FIGHTERS.
Freedom wasn’t because of Gandhi and Nehru’s struggle.
𝟳) 𝗪𝗔𝗤𝗙 was formed to give illegal rights to Mùś1ímš on our land & properties by the CONg. Mùś1ímš were allowed to follow their Personal Law superseding our constitution and civil laws where it suited them.
𝟴) We could have won the 1962 WAR against China if Nehru n his teams had used our armies and airforce CAPABILITIES properly & not with their hands tied.
𝟵) China CAPTURED large areas of Indian territory during the 1962 war & after that, raising serious questions & intentions of Nehru’s and CONg Govt after that and its handling of the border issues.
𝟭𝟬) Nehru gave away our seat at the
𝗨𝗡 𝗦𝗘𝗖𝗨𝗥𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗖𝗜𝗟 to China on a platter. We have suffered a lot due to this blunder.
𝟭𝟭) India under CONg handed 𝗧𝗜𝗕𝗘𝗧 to Chins which was a buffer between us and China on a platter and China now demands Arunachal, Sikkim too on the same basis.
𝟭𝟮) India would have won 1948 Kashmir war against Pakistan. Our Army was winning. But Nehru took the Kashmir issue to the 𝗨𝗡,it stopped the war and made the border as status quo and we lost half of Kashmir.
𝟭𝟯) Maharaja of 𝗝𝗔𝗠𝗠𝗨 & 𝗞𝗔𝗦𝗛𝗠𝗜𝗥, had agreed to merge with India without any conditions. But Nehru made JK as an AUTONOMOUS STATE with its own constitution and special rights under Art 370.
𝟭𝟰) The 1990 Hïndüs exodus from J&K was far more horrific than informed and it was a preplanned agenda executed by the separatists, Pakistanis, our leaders etc.
𝟭𝟱) 𝗔𝗠𝗔𝗡 𝗞𝗜 𝗔𝗦𝗛𝗔 was the brainchild of our leftists, LeLis and Is1amic groups to fool Hïndüs to keep Mùś1ímš keep growing.
𝟭𝟲) The claim that the 𝗧𝗔𝗝 𝗠𝗔𝗛𝗔𝗟 was built by Shahjahan for his wife was all BS. It’s supposedly a Hïndü temple, as were Ram mandir, Kashi and Mathura mandirs, Kutab minar and hundreds of more monuments.
𝟭𝟳) 𝗠𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗔𝗟 didn’t develop anything in India except looting, ki11ing and converting Hïndüs.
𝟭𝟴) The division between 𝗦𝗜𝗞𝗛𝗦 & 𝗛𝗜𝗡𝗗𝗨𝗦. is the brainchild of the Britishers & CONg
𝟭𝟵) India under CONg didn’t retaliate to numerous Pakistan’s Tërr0rïštš ATTACKS on us, it was a DELIBERATE move to keep ppl under constant fear and not pay attention to CONg scams.
𝟮𝟬) 𝗛𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗢𝗥𝗬 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗧 𝗔𝗦 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗘 𝗪𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗔𝗨𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗜𝗡 𝗦𝗖𝗛𝗢𝗢𝗟, it was twisted, altered and many chapters on true heroes missing.
𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 ��� 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗, 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗠𝗢𝗥𝗘 𝗜 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗘 𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗠𝗨𝗖𝗛 𝗪𝗔𝗦 𝗛𝗜𝗗𝗗𝗘𝗡 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗨𝗦 𝗔𝗟𝗟 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗦𝗘 𝗬𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗦 𝗧𝗢 𝗞��𝗘𝗣 𝗨𝗦 𝗔𝗪𝗔𝗬 𝗙𝗥𝗢𝗠 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗬 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗢𝗘𝗦 TO ADMIRE ONLY CONg DYNASTS😳🇮🇳
🇬🇷 Greek politician says:
"Europe is unrecognizable, filled with Muslims who hate us, in the name of Allah. We should be like Poland and Hungary. Start deporting them before Europe dies."
Well said, do you support her?
🚨Brahminical Patriarchy vs Progressive Feminism !
🚨 One thing is Confirmed !
👉 Either Hindus will Finish Congress in Next 5 Years !
👉 Or Congress will Finish Hindus in Next 5 Years.
🚨When Hindus will understand that Hindus are just Kaf!r for Congress !!!
Upper Cast Girls are being targeted by :
- !slamist
- Bheem Army
- Rice Bag converters
- C0mmunist
- Leftist
- Feminist
- Insta influencers
- Left IT-Cell
I’m Jain,
I stand with my Upper cast sisters.
Who’s with me?