@edwardstrngr65@JournoStephen An excellent pice by @JournoStephen
“Britain is not ungovernable. What it lacks is a political elite that wishes to govern it, to take decisions and the risks that come with them, to choose and to make those choices work.”
3 things yesterday which prove UK is no longer a serious country:
- Scottish MP sworn in, smirking & openly mocking the oath in the chamber
- Steve Bray permitted to blast out music while the PM was making resignation statement
- Burnham & the MPs selfie
What. An. Embarrassment
New SNP MP Lara Bird took the oath of allegiance to King Charles in the House of Commons and appeared to cross her fingers while doing it.
That is not a protest. It is contempt. Contempt for Parliament. Contempt for her office. Contempt for the constitution. This was an anti-British, anti-Unionist stunt from an MP who wants the privileges of Westminster while sneering at the very country that sent her there.
She is entitled to oppose the monarchy. She is entitled to support Scottish independence. But if her first act in Parliament is to treat the oath of office like a childish loophole, the public has every right to ask:
If the oath means nothing, what else is optional ?
It genuinely amused me that people think replacing Starmer will make things better.
From Boris Johnson's election onwards, we've been shuffling the bollards on the Titanic.
You have to actually change direction if you want to avoid crashing into the iceberg:
- End Net Zero
- Make business viable again
- Get welfare under control
- Fund defence
- Ensure equality under the law
- Arrest criminals and keep them in jail
- Deport illegal immigrants and close the border
- Bring the civil service to heel
Burnham will become as unpopular as Starmer within months since he isn't going to do any of that.
Just to remind these same folk:
You’ve not lifted 1/2m kids out of poverty. You’ve just moved them over a bureaucratic line on a Whitehall spreadsheet.
Your ‘workers rights’ are destroying entry-level jobs, hitting young people disproportionately, where unemployment is now over 16%.
You have not transformed the NHS. It’s still the same old wheezing leviathan, just with a lot more dosh and still dismal productivity.
And you’ve nationalised steel and rail before. It was not the prelude to an economic or industrial miracle. Plus you will now have to include their demands for capital/subsidies among all the other priorities already crowding in on the public purse.
Other than that your reminder was useful. Thank you.
I'm tired of constantly having to say this:
In every British election more people vote for LEFT wing parties than for right
The right succeeded b4 because it was united & the left was split
Makerfield again shows the left are more willing to vote tactically to block Reform than the right is willing to vote tactically to block Labour
Green and Lib Dem voters showed no party loyalty, lending their vote to Labour. This was not reflected on the right.
This is a disaster
The right must get its act together and either unite or learn to vote tactically
Does our fractured right really hate each other so much that we are willing to allow the Left to form the next government?
I'm afraid we don't have time for this. Because there is another uncomfortable truth I keep repeating:
Right wing voters are dying at TWICE THE RATE of left wing voters
And they are not being replenished amongst the young. We have the most radically left wing youth in history (3/4 of youth are on the political left).
We do not have time for the drama of right wing divisions.
Britain's demographic time bomb means we only have one or two general elections left to save the country (and reverse the left's domination over youth education etc.,)
To win a majority government the winning party must secure at least 31%/32% of the national vote.
There must be sufficient unity or tactical voting on the right to enable that to happen.
The Left won't be *as* united in a General Election as they were in Makerfield. Nevertheless, we are going to see them engage in tactical voting as NEVER BEFORE.
This is the time to put emotion and everything else aside and face the cold hard mathematical reality.
Keir Starmer doesn’t know how VPNs work.
David Lammy doesn’t know how the court system works.
Rachel Reeves doesn’t know how the economy works.
None of them knows what a woman is.
Not exactly Britain’s brightest and best.
🚨BREAKING: Hampshire Police WILL NOT charge Vickrum Digwa's Brother despite him being caught on camera agreeing to LIE to cover up Henry Nowak's Murder
A leading lawyer has told the Daily Mail he believes Gurpreet Digwa should have been prosecuted for:
- PREVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE
- PERJURY
- ASSISSTING AN OFFENDER
- OBSTRUCTING POLICE
This is outrageous
WHY ARE POLICE NOT PROSECUTING HIM?
I was a card-carrying member of the Labour Party back when Labour was still pretending to represent the working class. Before it morphed into the party of metropolitan progressives, identity freaks, race baiters, climate zealots, Jew haters, and open borders globalist loonies hustling the Muslim rapist vote.
If you’re white working class, the Labour Party wants your vote, but not your opinion, because they think you’re thick and a bit of a racist.
(Knock knock.)
“Good evening, sir. We don’t know you, we don’t want to know you, we have nothing in common with you, and we have no interest in your welfare. Can we rely on your vote?”
“Oh yes. We always vote Labour. Proud of it. Up the workers.”
Yeah, good luck with that.
This man who (incredibly) is still trying to cover up the ongoing mass rape of English girls by Muslims wants us to believe that he cares about children’s safety.