I asked chatGPT about this and it says you are 🤥
🕋 1. “Muhammad spent the last 10 years of his life fighting 83 wars.”
False.
The Prophet Muhammad participated in or was connected to around 27 military expeditions (ghazawat) — not 83.
Of those, only about 8–9 involved actual fighting (e.g. Badr, Uhud, the Trench).
The rest were non-violent patrols, defensive alliances, or deterrence missions.
He lived in Medina for the final 10 years of his life (622–632 CE).
Most of the conflicts during that time were defensive, responding to repeated attacks and persecution by the Meccans and other hostile tribes.
⚔️ 2. “He invaded tribes, took their lands, enslaved their women and children.”
Highly misleading.
The Prophet did not launch wars of conquest for land or wealth.
Most fighting occurred in defense of the Muslim community after years of persecution, exile, and assassination attempts.
When territories were taken (e.g., Mecca), there was no massacre or forced conversion — instead, Muhammad declared a general amnesty.
Captives in that era (as in all societies at the time) could become slaves, but Islam regulated and humanized slavery — encouraging manumission (freeing slaves) as an act of piety and establishing strict protections for them. In many cases, captives were freed, ransomed, or integrated into society (e.g., after Badr).
📜 3. “Over 100 verses calling for fighting, killing, and subjugating non-believers.”
Grossly misrepresented.
The Qur’an contains verses about fighting, but these are context-specific — referring to particular battles when Muslims were under attack.
There is no verse commanding Muslims to wage war on non-believers simply for their belief.
The Qur’an repeatedly emphasizes:
“There is no compulsion in religion” (Qur’an 2:256)
“If they incline to peace, then incline to it [also]” (8:61)
“Fight in the way of God those who fight you, but do not transgress” (2:190)Scholars of Islamic law and history (Muslim and non-Muslim alike) overwhelmingly interpret these verses as conditional — defensive, not aggressive.
@AraziMarina The three judges were:
Nicolas Guillou (France) – Presiding Judge
Reine Alapini-Gansou (Benin)
Beti Hohler (Slovenia)
https://t.co/oZ1sL5s99q
@AraziMarina You know what is the biggest problem now? I can not argue with you harshly because you really really have one of the most beautiful eyes I have ever seen :D
So I am confused :D
But I will only say this regarding Gad, he is not an honest person and he is biased towards Israel
@AraziMarina No, the warrant went through a chamber in the ICC with two judges (chamber 2) and after Israel defense still went through with the warrant.
So its not one person deciding this.
@AraziMarina How is this related to the war crimes? can you please help me.
Why are you just bringing Mosad agent Gad Saad terms while we are talking about completely another thing?
@AraziMarina You do not need to commit war crimes in the process of protecting yourself!
There is not a single human rights organization that is not confirming huge violations!
And again, your PM is literally wanted for war crimes!
@AraziMarina You are right, I will never understand. It’s hard to understand when all human rights organisations say otherwise and your PM is wanted by international criminal court for war crimes.
It's a good time to remember the words of the Mossad agent to Leslie Stahl of 60-Minutes:
"We create a pretend world. We are a global production company: We write the screenplay, we’re the directors, we’re the producers, we’re the main actors. And the world is our stage.”