Tunis/C

Fair warning, I do not like double standards or hypocrisy so if you present one I will call you out on it until you either engage with it or block me.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

So...
Based on this picture socialism produces more food overall and just doesn't give it to people and capitalism produces significantly less food and distributes most of it to the people that need it the least?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

So Charlemagne's only point was that Stephen A Smith had another conversation behind closed doors where we just have to guess what was said and ignore everything else said or done prior.

Charlemagne wanted it public so we all could find out what was said.

So why should Charlemagne talk to Trump about a conversation Trump had with Stephen A?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@Hellcat707S @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher He didn't call him a liar.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@McCannCaseTweet @Hellcat707S @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher I don't care whether or not you "see an issue," because I don't know you.

Are you going to answer my question or not?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@TheQuartering So wait,
If Christina Applegate was political it would be okay to attack her for her MS?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@ginamilan_ How do you think that that's the same thing?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@JayW09450931 @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher Straight to insults,

Awesome...

Have a good day man...lol

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

But everything you're saying is different from what Charlemagne's issue with Stephen A Smith is.

Charlemagne asked why he did not make the conversation public.

Unless you think Charlemagne should be chasing Trump down for a conversation about Stephen A Smith's conversation, I don't see the relevance of anything else you are arguing.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@RenzYung @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@McCannCaseTweet @Hellcat707S @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher I noticed that you didn't answer my question. Have we just automatically changed topics?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@Hellcat707S @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher So you want Charlemagne to go to the White House to ask Donald Trump what conversation he had with Stephen A. Smith?

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@JayW09450931 @stephenasmith @cthagod @billmaher Not if said "conversation" goes nowhere and only boosts egos.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

I just don't understand how he doesn't see this as highly counterproductive.

For starters, by not even mentioning a Bill or anything tangible to follow Trump could literally have Congress toss in a couple million dollars in aid to a bill that eventually strips the VRA or CRA further and use the money as a way of saying that he appeased Stephen A.

We all know how "talks" go with Trump, if you have nothing to hold him accountable he will just make empty promises and use you as a prop to avoid criticism.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

If you ever want to see the inevitable endgame of "enlightened Centrism," read this.
Reducing an ad that brings up the pain of a sexual assault by letting a person's 80+ year old mother who protected it call her a liar to whether or not it's "effective," shows how cynical and dishonest radical centrism can go to pretend to be neutral in defense of the right.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

I don't remember @JoJoFromJerz ever being on the ballet for president.

[David @DavidFischer]

I don’t EVER want to hear one word from the Democrats and far left again about President Trump and how he talks to people. To talk about a man’s mother in this regard is purely satanic.

You Dems ALL think this way she just says it. So next time you want to criticize the President for his lack of decorum, remember this moment, sit down, and shut the hell up.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

Here is my issue with @stephenasmith,

In his response to @cthagod he pointed out why he wasn't able to film the conversation but he didn't address the fact that Trump literally said that he and @billmaher have to put on a performance for their respective audiences.

In his response to @jemelehill he asked her the gaslighting question of "are you saying that we should say nothin'?" But her avoided the clear opportunity to advocate what bill would exactly address his HBCU stance or the Congress people that he spoke to that would push the Bill. So the question is why would you go to the executive for something you can't even prove the legislature is even discussing?

And his response to @DLHughleyRadio is the exact type of response you would expect if the conversation was more about you showing that you rub elbows with people in power more than you wanted anything of real substance to be addressed.

This is why it is "banana in the tailpipe."

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@correctfact @theisabelb @Google I want you to explain to me how Reddit is the same as the KKK.

And if you can't then you understand why this argument is ridiculous.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

@queen_966 If it's so obvious then you should have no issue explaining it.

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

Yes, I know what happened, would you care to answer the question?

[🇸🇦⚔️🌴 @queen_966]

@Dialoguealways @mariaa_awd بما انك جبت طاري جمال خاشقجي هل انت قرأت عن القصة ،او زي التبن تسمع كلمه وتنقلها ولاتعرف عنها شئ

[Tunis/C @Dialoguealways]

I asked you to justify it within your laws because Saudi law is supposed to be the reason for both of these decisions.

When the United States makes these decisions, they're making the decisions outside of their laws which makes them a problem.

So I'll ask again within your religious laws. How do you justify this?