DGK

Electrical Systems Analyst. Developing open-source frameworks for complex systems. Constructive critique and data-driven feedback are always welcome.

[DGK @Digdug30]

The background on my PFAS Remediation Framework.
For anyone interested. My Master's Degree is in Electrical Engineering. I started troubleshooting and developing advanced circuits quite a few years ago. I have been studying electrical systems for several years as well. I have been using AI agents for the last year to help me design frameworks to stop the advancement of pollutants in the Earth's ecosystems. I learned about PFAS in firefighter foam 10 years ago when a friend of mine developed thyroid cancer. I also discovered that PFAS was in the watersheds around military bases because of its use on the airfields by crash crews. My goal since that time has been to use my knowledge of systems troubleshooting to try to find a solution to this ever-growing issue. I have read many papers. I saw many great ideas come to fruition, but in and of themselves did not fully solve the PFAS destruction problem. So I watched and waited. I put pieces of technology together in a loose framework of a combined system to accomplish this task several years ago. But I put it on hold until new technology was discovered to help complete the framework and make it coherent. New papers were written and research results came out that completed what I thought could be a coherent system to eliminate PFAS from our ecosystems. So I developed my framework and did the math to my best ability. Then I used my AI agents to check and crosscheck my framework to find any miscalculations and mistakes. After several corrections, the framework became viable. So I wrote the paper, and yes I had my AI agent check the math and polish the writing on the preprint for publishing. If you think it is incoherent or missing any math, feel free to point it out. Or better yet. It is open-sourced. Download the preprint and do your own work to show me any mistakes or just improve the framework and use it in your own research.

[DGK @Digdug30]

Appealing to non-existent original manuscripts and flipping the burden of proof doesn't answer the question: without an independent, falsifiable method to separate human bias from divine intent, accepting the text as 'truthful' remains an exercise in blind faith. Which you explicitly deny is necessary in your bio. Believe whatever you like. But do not presume to be hypocritical and also completely evade any rational questioning by circular reasoning. You have yet to verify the basis of your beliefs beyond human interaction with a deity that is completely based on human writings. Good luck Internet preacher.

[DGK @Digdug30]

If you concede the authors brought personal biases and human limitations to the text, what falsifiable criteria do you use to separate human error from divine truth in any given verse?
Admitting human bias directly invalidates Biblical Inerrancy. Once you accept that the text contains human cultural bias, historical inaccuracies and moral limitations become human artifacts, not divine law or "scripture" that all other human must blindly believe.

[DGK @Digdug30]

It was written by human beings. You are attributing human traits described and derived from the Bible to justify their "inspired by God" relationship and therefore their writings as true. That is circular logic and flawed by its very nature. Humans beings are also flawed by their evolution to make up stories, embelish others stories and tell fabrications to instill fear, angst, and other emotions to regulate behaviors. You are proposing that the humans that wrote the Bible over hundreds of years were all "inspired by God" and had no human frailty or flaws. Very dubious line of belief at best. Ridiculous blind faith at worst.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@Highway_30 "I see your Schwartz is as big as mine"

[DGK @Digdug30]

@samueleyekosi Our universe is not 14 billion years old. It's always been infinite.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@thenayvuiiiton Dimethyltryptamine

[DGK @Digdug30]

@ScottFishman Cognitive Dissonance

[DGK @Digdug30]

Incorrect. Under Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 101.63, serving an already intoxicated person is a criminal offense, and TABC regulations require staff to deny service to anyone showing signs of intoxication, regardless of the substance responsible. There is no irony here. Move along.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@GanjaScore @WhiteHouse Go smoke your weed. When you come back hopefully you have pontificated on how none of your post has any basis in reality. You are a ridiculous human being evidently.

[DGK @Digdug30]

Updated the PFAS Remediation Framework to v3.2. Two kinds of fixes:
Technical: chemical notation (TiO₄O₇, ¹⁹F-NMR, NH₄⁺) was rendering as black boxes due to an encoding issue — fixed.
Scientific: tightened the biological reduction section. The Acidimicrobium A6 bioagent's 40–60% removal figure was being read alongside "stoichiometric fluoride release" — but the source study reports total fluorine held constant over the incubation, so parent-compound removal and net defluorination aren't the same claim. Now stated as such. Also added an explicit note that the staged A6→GENIA architecture (acidic Feammox stage into near-neutral polishing) is v3.2's own engineering hypothesis for reconciling incompatible operating chemistries — not a validated combined result. Each consortium is independently validated on its own; the series hasn't been run.
https://t.co/69gH1kvRal

[DGK @Digdug30]

@purdy_everyday @yyuiqbuui @ProudSocialist You have a reading comprehension or cognitive disability evidently. I just stated facts. At no point did I claim a preference. So no. I don't think I need to take a closer look at anything. But thanks for offering up your completely unsubstantiated opinion.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@yyuiqbuui @ProudSocialist You misread my intent. I never implied it was desirable. I just stated facts. The op was misleading and needed correction.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@DadLAMPSMKIII @realMAG1775 Are you fucking eyeballing me?

[DGK @Digdug30]

Why are you treating two completely different economic, legal, and historical mechanisms as interchangeable cultural instances. Chinatown instances were developed as organic envlaves of urbanism and historical segregation.
The H1-B Visa issue is not even close to being the same thing. And I'm pretty sure you knew that before you posted.
Is this a engagement response?

[DGK @Digdug30]

Is this a joke? Selective Service is already Mandatory for every man on their 18th birthday.
The continuous requirement for 18-year-old males to register with the Selective Service System has been in effect since July 2, 1980, when President Jimmy Carter issued Proclamation 4771. What is this? You have Google.
A President cannot unilaterally reinstitute military conscription through executive action. Reinstating an active draft requires a new Act of Congress amending the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq.).
Did someone addle your brain with the drugs that turn frogs gay?

[DGK @Digdug30]

I can explain it so everyone can stop wasting their cognitive energy on this subject.
A lawmaker's primary daily metric is capital extraction. Passing a popular bill ends a lucrative legislative dispute, whereas keeping a bill in procedural limbo creates a perpetual, high-value fundraising hook targeted at PACs, special interest networks, and partisan donor bases.
Lawmakers utilize Senate rules (such as Rule XXII / the virtual filibuster) to block popular legislation without ever having to cast an explicit, on-the-record floor vote.
This procedural shielding allows members to claim public alignment with their constituents while privately fulfilling donor and party demands to stall or kill the legislation.
In a functioning republic, ignoring an 80%+ constituent consensus results in electoral defeat. In the modern system, capital accumulation offsets constituent dissatisfaction. High-volume fundraising secures primary protection, saturates airwaves, and neutralizes political fallout.
Just so everyone can see why the Save Act will not pass anytime soon.
It is not about the will of the people. In fact it is in direct conflict and purposely used for political fundraising and securing future seats in Congress.

[DGK @Digdug30]

@RealAlexJones First thing you train your children with is getting brain damage? That sounds about right.