Nate

|John 3:16 🙏🏽| Follower Of Christ | Proud Father |Content Creator|

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

refreshing and could really push the franchise forward and bring in an entire new audience and player base. Some of the OG's are going to hate it

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

Day 1 opinion of Gears Of War EDAY
In my opinion someone who has always been a GOW fan & player over the years is the multiplayer as it currently stands is a 8/10 there is a few bugs and kinks that still need to be worked out but i had a lot of fun today. It is something new and

[Terry @TerryHB_]

GET RID OF 12 SECOND SPAWNS

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

Need a squad for ranked on E-DAY Gold 3 n up #gearsofwareday

[DomeZ @D0meZ]

Gears of War E-DAY Gameplay Shmovement 🔥

[Agent @ Tokon waiting lobby @Agent4709]

He speaking facts. And a lot of people will say the game play ass but ummm maybe time for some self reflection😂

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

Keep fighting the good fight Ohio !

#TikTok https://t.co/GPSP0Kreq1

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

‼️

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

yoo lmao

[Fanum Updates 🧪 @FanumUpdater]

Fanum says he used to try & ragebait the CIA & see if they was listening to his conversations on the game or phone & say wild stuff to see if they show up 😭

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

Oh no the orange man is turning red lmao 😂

[Crypto Rover @cryptorover]

💥BREAKING:

Donald Trump has reportedly been fuming all weekend over how everyone keeps calling his administration the “Epstein Administration.”

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

Trump , Pam Bondi and all of his administration needs to be charged with treason , conspiracy against the United States Of America and perjury

[Global UPDATES @GlobalUpdates24]

BREAKING –

US government has announced that it won't release any more Epstein files

Only 3.5 million out of 6 million files have been released so far

[Spencer Hakimian @SpencerHakimian]

🚨BREAKING: THOMAS MASSIE RUINS DONALD TRUMP

“THIS IS THE EPSTEIN ADMINISTRATION.”

[Ethan (X) @itsEFlyX]

@DefiantLs

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

Thomas Massie: "My political career is on the line, and my own health and well-being could be too. I’ve upset a lot of billionaires who obviously aren’t of high moral character."

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

are on you stand for the truth and justice and stand up for the things that will help your everyday American

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

As they have for years 💯I’m glad we got people like @RepThomasMassie and @RepRoKhanna that are standing up for what is right and is not trying to play party politics when it comes to the Epstein Files. We need to get back to the roots of no matter what side of the isle you

[Thomas Massie @RepThomasMassie]

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?”

Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks.

The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp.

Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept!

The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote.

Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this.

Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic.

The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package.

There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next.

This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL.

The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced.

The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act.

The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along.

If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

I wouldn’t doubt if some of the streamers & content creators are compromised by a government entity. Who it is ? Time will tell but be careful out here 🤷🏽‍♂️💯

[ryan 🤿 @scubaryan_]

Fanum talks about how much the Streaming Industry is changing and how it was consumed by people who are in power 👀

[Coinvo @Coinvo]

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 U.S. Department of Homeland Security has officially shut down due to lack of funding.

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

As they should be, but that means we could also get someone that’s worse to takes their place 🤦🏾‍♂️

[Spencer Hakimian @SpencerHakimian]

🚨BREAKING: REPUBLICANS ARE DEMANDING PAM BONDI AND KASH PATEL BE FIRED

[Nate @DiggIsLive]

If it’s so boring and you’re just so innocent RELEASE ALL FILES AND UN-REDACT EVERY NAME ON THAT LIST ! it’s that simple 💯

[Coinvo @Coinvo]

🇺🇸 PRESIDENT TRUMP: "I don't understand why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody, It's boring.

Only bad people want to keep something like that going."