Skip Di Massa

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@MattMojoMan @DLoesch Look at you, Matt! You avoid the topic at hand and engage in an ad hominem attack (you may need to look that up), just to make yourself look like a jackass. Well done, big guy - you must have killed it in debate class!

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@leadandapple @dbongino Yo Aaron: You guys been waiting for 7 years now. And almost every day of these seven years, I heard "yeah, but THIS time he's REALLY in trouble." Friendly advice: wait til it happens so you don't look so silly each time he's absolved.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@MNtravis @BonginoReport So on point, WH. Is anyone of your ilk capable of addressing the issue at hand without pivoting to Trump?
You must have been a champ in debate class.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@Biden24_ @BonginoReport Unverified because you say so, DB, or because you know something that no one else does? Is Solomon lying? How do you know? Or is it just your practice to engage in ad hominem attacks against people who say things you don't want to hear?

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@Sarge1700Perry @MeToo4016762753 @BonginoReport Spot on, Ron

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@Mad_as_heII @tedcruz Yo, Mad! I do try to be civil, but your question betrays a breathtaking level of stupidity. I’m not from New York, and I find this behavior disgusting; for anyone to allow it is reprehensible; and for any AMERICAN who doesn’t condemn it is unpatriotic.

Shame on you.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@XY70884363 @T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch Spot on, XY.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch I’m sorry, sloth, but you don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve tried to put this into terms that even you might understand, but you’re either unwilling or unable to grasp basic concepts. All you’ve succeeded in doing is showing that your political bias is blinding you.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @XY70884363 @DLoesch Way out of your league now, sloth. You need to understand basic terminology before you use it.

Why wasn’t Trump convicted either time when impeached? Because the “evidence” was insufficient to overcome the prosecution’s burden of proof.

It was still evidence.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch I’ll try again: look up the word “evidence.” Statements not made formally or under oath do not constitute testimony, but they still qualify as “evidence.” The FBI reports are not testimony, but can be introduced into evidence. You’re missing the boat, sloth.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @XY70884363 @DLoesch sloth: you’re now in over your head. You may choose to discount the evidence (tho
I note that someone with your clear bias would unlikely be chosen as a juror), but that has nothing to do with the fact that it is “evidence,” or that others would find it more credible than you do

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch Sloth, please look up the term “evidence.” Testimony, whether you believe it or not, is evidence. That you choose not to believe it does not change the fact that it is evidence.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch Let’s agree to disagree. Bobulinski’s firsthand testimony is evidence. The FBI 1023’s(?) are evidence. There are a lot of whistleblowers who have provided evidence. The woman who came forward about Joe’s sexual advances gave evidence.
Your saying otherwise cannot change that.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch You haven’t heard me once say that I have no curiosity about “my boy.” If he broke the law, he should be punished appropriately. Your ilk has “convicted” Trump on numerous occasions, though, and wound up with nothing but egg on your collective faces.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch And all the Russia collusion/impeachment investigations that came up empty? Yet you KNOW that Trump’s a criminal and Biden’s not?
You say there’s no evidence to incriminate Joe. There actually is. But at least let the investigations conclude before you make your pronouncements.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch You said a mouthful, sloth. But you skirted the question of why your ilk, when there’s a criticism of Biden, responds with the
word “Trump.”
And what are Trump’s “obvious”crimes-why hasn’t he been convicted? Why do you have no intellectual curiosity about the Biden allegations?

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@LandM_Marius @BonginoReport And 6 years for all of your ilk’s efforts re Trump, bitcoin. And with every new allegation, we’d hear “this is the one that’ll get him incarcerated.”
Everyone should just calm down and (hopefully) allow the system to work.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@T_Slothrop_Esq @DLoesch Certainly entitled to your opinion, Sloth. My reaction was to your pivot to Trump. You apparently have no intellectual curiosity about what “your boy” might have done in the past, and when someone makes an allegation, you guys just deflect to Trump. Like I said, silly response.

[Skip Di Massa @DiMassa4]

@TweetMore12 @BonginoReport …and you know this how, “Patriot?” Or do you just have no intellectual curiosity when it comes to investigating a D?