🚨BREAKING: First unofficial UK Simulator gameplay trailer just dropped.
A survival horror game about the collapse of safety, free speech, and common sense in modern Britain.
Wall of text warning.
I understand that on a surface level, the story they sell you is a good thing. Protecting kids, keeping them off websites they shouldn't be on, stopping predators - I don't think anyone is against all these things. But the fallacy here is that the implementation of all this monitoring means ANYONE could be implicated for ANYTHING the government deems a threat, now or later.
It's akin to installing a camera and microphone in every room of your house that records everything 24/7 and is easily accessible by law enforcement at any time. Not just live feeds, but all the archives going back years as well. And on top of that there are intelligence agencies deploying AI tools to scan all the footage to detect any "problematic" behavior. Even if you're not breaking any laws, they are more than free to flag you for this stuff and start building a profile, false positives included. This is the system they are setting up on the internet.
Let me give you an example: You want to log into Instagram but they require you to do an ID and face scan. So you do it. Now your friend is a bit of an edgy person and sends you a funny meme criticizing Israel. You find it silly, like the post. Instagram recognizes that and serves you some more edgy memes of this nature. Instagram's algorithm is constantly building a profile on you and flags that you like "Israel critic" content. Not illegal. Nothing to hide. Yet. Legislation is later passed that considers even memes of this nature to be racist and antisemitic, punishable by law with fines or worse. Law enforcement queries Meta for a list of all profiles deemed to fall into this category, Meta hands over your real name proven by your "age-verification check". Now you're on an intelligence agency watchlist. They have probable cause to monitor all your online activity and punish you for one misstep. Say the wrong thing, criticize or make fun of the wrong person, look at the wrong website - all fair game to them.
Going back to the cameras in your home, it's like owning a firearm completely legally for years, the AI system flags this to the government. And then firearms are outlawed. You were already flagged so you are now monitored as someone who could pose a risk to the public because you followed all laws in the past.
Stuff like this is already happening around the world. And don't kid yourself by thinking the government doesn't drool over the prospect of implementing the same kind of systems that Iran has where they imprison people for using the internet during a nation-wide shutdown.
Governments want more control, all of them, for all of history.
We won't be far behind if C-22 passes. In its current state, VPNs would almost certainly require us to log identifying user data.
Signal isn't headquartered in Canada so they can just shut off Canadian servers, but our HQ is. We pay an ungodly amount of taxes to this corrupt government, and in return they want to destroy the entire essence of our service to basically spy on its own citizens.
Not happening. We'll move HQ and take our taxes elsewhere.
Hello, Johnny. We are actively reviewing draft Bill C-22 and will participate in any relevant consultation process available to us. However, should Bill C-22 pass in its current form and if we are subjected to mandatory obligations, there isn't a scenario in which we would compromise our no-logs architecture or encryption protections. To prevent this, we will consider all viable options, including limiting or, if necessary, removing our presence from Canadian jurisdiction.
🚨MAJOR BREAKING
The government is trying to BURY this one
Canada has just SIGNED an agreement with the Musqueam First Nation
giving them PROPERTY TITLE RIGHTS
to MOST OF VANCOUVER! .... I AM NOT KIDDING HERE!
@JacobAndHisSons@fiddlergauntlet@25YearsAgoLive@grok No, killing is wrong. Killing innocent people is *more* wrong.
However, no matter how you measure it, Israel is the obvious aggressor. The only reason someone would hold an opposing view of that is because Israel also controls the vast majority of media sources.
Everyone is talking about Epstein, but no one is talking about who replaced him after his "death."
Do you really believe the global extortion economy just closed up shop because the store manager "committed suicide"?
That is not how supply and demand works. The demand for leverage over politicians, scientists, and erratic billionaires has never been higher. The market is booming. So who is running the logistics now? Who picked up the black book?
We keep obsessing only over Epstein and a old list of pedophiles while the operation itself most likely underwent a corporate rebranding. They have new management. Better security. Less flamboyant marketing. I bet the list keep getting longer.
The blackmail industry is a vital organ of the state department and foreign intelligence. Epstein wasn't only selling flesh. He was selling insurance policies. He was a vault where the elite stored their mutually assured destruction. When the vault manager dies, you hire a new manager because the deposits don't disappear.
We are years past the "suicide" and we still haven't seen a single meaningful arrest of a client. Not one. That tells you everything you need to know about who is actually in charge. The system is protecting this new asset.
Now, look at the power vacuums in 2026. We are watching politicians make decisions that make zero sense for their constituents but perfect sense for someone holding a gun to their career. That isn't incompetence.
That is compliance. The leverage is still active. The strings are still being pulled. We are just arguing about the puppet master's ghost instead of looking at the new hands.
The new Epstein isn't a socialite throwing parties in Manhattan. They are boring, they learned their lesson last time. They are bureaucratic and they are currently recording everything.
If you had to bet your life savings on who the new handler is, would you even have the guts to say the name out loud?
Yesterday in @JudiciaryGOP, @AGPamBondi hurled personal insults instead of answering my legitimate questions about major gaps and serious flaws in the Epstein Files Transparency Act document production.
If you can’t take up for children who were sex trafficked, who can you take up for?
The answer: no one. You’ll defend no one if your political capital is at stake, and you need to be purged from our party.