Dissident Writes

As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man
There are only four things certain since Social Progress began.

[Cernovich @Cernovich]

Much easier to post slop like this than discuss abortion.

[RedHawk @redpilledhawk]

Rich blacks commit more crime than poor Whites. Most white collar crime is committed by Jews. Crime is about iq, culture, race, and moral character. Wealth and material needs are almost never a factor.

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@Cernovich This is just post birth abortion, we all knew it was going here. Right now they need the excuse of some kind of postpartum excuse but eventually it'll be seen as a mother's right.

[Paulo Spitzbarth 🇧🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱 @PauloSpitzbarth]

🚨🇺🇸 CAR@LHO, QUE LAPADA! 🔥🔥🔥

CNN: “Este é um imigrante sem documentos...”

Miller: “Eles estavam aqui ILEGALMENTE?”

CNN: “Quero que esta seja uma discussão de boa-fé...”

Miller: “Quando você usa uma linguagem feita para ocultar a verdade, isso NÃO é boa-fé. Um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL é um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL. Eles não são ‘imigrantes sem documentos’.”

CNN: “Stephen, estamos tentando humanizar o debate...”

Miller: “Humanizar? Então vamos humanizar o Código Penal também. O assaltante de banco passa a ser ‘especialista em retirada sem agendamento prévio’. O estelionatário vira ‘empreendedor de narrativas financeiras alternativas’. O cara que entra na sua casa sem convite é só um ‘visitante com documentação pendente’. Que tal?”

CNN: “Isso é uma analogia grosseira.”

Miller: “Grosseira é fingir que a lei federal some porque a redação da CNN inventou um eufemismo mais fofo. ‘Sem documentos’ soa como alguém que esqueceu a carteira no Uber. Não. É alguém que cruzou a fronteira sem autorização, ficou, e agora a imprensa trata o estatuto jurídico como se fosse uma questão de estilo de escrita.”

CNN: “Mas muitos contribuem para a economia...”

Miller: “Ah, o argumento clássico: o crime deixa de ser crime se a pessoa lava prato ou constrói telhado. Pelo mesmo critério, o contrabandista de cigarro também ‘contribui’, gera emprego no transporte. Quer que a gente chame ele de ‘empreendedor logístico informal’? A CNN topa?”

CNN: “Você está polarizando.”

Miller: “Não. Eu estou recusando o dicionário de marketing. Vocês mudam a palavra, depois acusam quem usa o termo legal de ser ‘desumano’. É o truque mais velho do livro: primeiro suaviza o vocabulário, depois declara vitória moral. Os Estados Unidos já cansaram desse teatro. Chamem o que é. Ou admitam que o objetivo nunca foi clareza — foi controle da narrativa.”

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@ImBatman75028 Yes infighting with allies is much more productive.

[Western Lensman @WesternLensman]

Piker: "It’s laughable to say guys like myself, guys like Abdul El-Sayed, we hate America."

Also Piker: "I hate America."

[BowTiedBull.eth - Read Pinned or NGMI @BowTiedBull]

Most people do not bet on themselves and start a biz

They get locked into high fixed costs with a massive mortgage stretching beyond healthy ranges

If you bet on yourself, get the house paid, the number you need to feel rich is at least 50% less than what you estimated

[Palmer Luckey @PalmerLuckey]

"Elon retweeted it. You, instead, replied with a straw man, which you then retweeted (really dude?) to draw in all your followers."

No, I did not. Please stop lying.

"I can only guess that I must have gotten the better of you in some past exchange"

You are so full of yourself, Paul. You know exactly what my problem with you is, to the point where you have emailed Anduril leadership whining about it - I think it is really shitty for you to take constant potshots at America and Americans for being ignorant/religious/bigoted when you are the one who came here, made all your money, and then abandoned our country to shitpost from the English countryside.

[Palmer Luckey @PalmerLuckey]

@RichardHanania This is not a right vs left issue. You are exactly the sort of person I am talking about.

Your "You don't believe in free markets unless non-American workers with unAmerican values are treated the same as American citizens!" Jedi mind trick only works on the weak of spirit.

[Jebus @Jebus]

Weird how this doesn’t extend to Europeans ruling African nations

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@JackPosobiec @RussSpacy This isn't the win you seem to think it is.

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@JackPosobiec Come on man...

[hoe_math = PsychoMath @ItIsHoeMath]

"Race doesn't exist. That's why I hate White people."

It is every single one of them. I am not exaggerating.

[Fusilli Spock @awstar11]

Given the opportunity, you would have confiscated her wealth.

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@michaelmalice Is this not copy from an AfD ad?

[University of Austin (UATX) @uaustinorg]

Universities stopped asking "what is true and good?" and started asking "how does this make you feel?"

UATX President Carlos Carvalho:

[Dissident Writes @DissidentWrites]

@FischerKing64 Abdulloi Toshpulodzoda is to "Virginia man" as Ellen Page is to "man".

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

Flock cameras will not be used to stop
crime

They will be used against enemies of the regime

[Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @Sargon_of_Akkad]

I'm going to explain why your strawman of the debate going on does not land with people who don't already fail to understand the discussion (your supporters).

1. Liberalism doesn't think that people are inherently bad. Hobbes thought this, but Locke didn't, and your government is built on Locke and not Hobbes. Ergo, Locke assumes "the people", whatever that means when you're in the state of nature, are fundamentally good and hold the right of revolt against the state. Why would you want bad people to revolt? They would only be able to construct an evil state.

2. "Limit power" isn't the issue in contention here. Even under a system of limited power, someone must wield whatever power is available. So the question of who wields what available power is actually the issue at hand, not the scope of the power. Defaulting to this mischaracterisation of the discussion is a strange thing and why people think you are the right hand of the left: all you do when you say "right wingers shouldn't take power" is guarantee left-wing occupation of power. The ratchet cranks and civilisation becomes more retarded, and you throw your hands up and say "what could have been done? Nothing! We shall just have to learn our childrens' new pronouns!"

3. All we can deduce from this is that you believe the right is evil and the left is good. This shines through from all centre-right discourse: the left aren't evil, they're stupid. This implies you share their goals and their fault is in the method, not the end.

4. An actual right-winger, the postliberals you are denouncing, have thought about what the structure of society actually ought to look like to produce the best outcomes for the most people. That also involves preventing evil. This means that positive actions must be taken against those perpetrating evil, and this you characterise as "woke right", and therefore, forbidden.

5. Any view of Christianity you take from this point onwards is fundamentally gelded, and that you prioritise secular liberalism (a man-made ideology) over your Christian faith (revealed truth) suggests that your faith in God's will is actually weaker than your faith in man's reason. You cannot assert any Christian principles you claim to hold in the face of atheists, Satanists, pagans and Muslims taking over your country, so what is the point of all this? Do you really believe God's word or not?

6. Power is an inevitable consequence of human activity. Get used to some people wielding power. It could be your fellow Christians, or it could be godless heathens, but someone is going to exercise power over you. Make a choice.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

Yeah that’s not how greatness works, Jeff. India has 2X more people than the entire earth did in Mozart’s time and they’ve produced precisely zero Mozarts. Numbers don’t produce greatness, cultures do.

It’s baffling how such smart people think and say the stupidest things.