DlamzMS

We here

[T @TorayKortan]

@Keni_Crypto Look at everything, they’re all a good entry point for positioning

[Tyler @TylerDurden]

Market review will uploaded at New York Open on Twitter.

Will include $HYPE, $ETH and Ansem.

[JOKAMRREDPILLZ @JOKAQARMY1]

Edward Snowden in 2013

[The Sigma Mindset @thesigmamindset]

Never be honest with a woman (listen carefully)...

[NO CONTEXT HUMANS @HumansNoContext]

This is my dream job

[ANUNNAKI🪽 @Anunnaki_Creed]

THE HIVE MIND🪽
.

[Thandubuntu @Solphendukaa]

Naves cooked . Spectecularly !!!

[TraderSZ @trader1sz]

@ElonMuskPDA $Bert

[XO @Trader_XO]

Zero bullshit and always balanced

Give it a watch

[TraderSZ @trader1sz]

My thoughts on $BTC. Main focus for me is $SOL and why i think solana outperforms $BTC and $ETH based on $SOLBTC and $SOLETH charts

I give my trigger plans for both $BTC and $SOL with clear invalidations.

Also covered $DXY and fx majors. why its significant when i plan for swing trades and how i use it for crypto.

[Dear Son. @DearS_o_n]

When you understand the game, you don't panic, bro.

[NukeCapital @NukeCapital]

$BTC

Hello Bulls I’m Still holding since 10/16/25 !!! What a ride!! Find out precisely when I’ll be buying my hedge and my thoughts for the start of Q3 (July) my birthday month Live in my vip discord below🔋

Vip discord: https://t.co/VpGjh6poEC

Vip affiliate: https://t.co/uIn2l1yu74

[XO @Trader_XO]

Why a high win rate isnt the holy grail?

Ok nothing new here but just sharing from my own experience:

In 2018, when I first started trading with leverage, I made the same mistake many new traders make, which is ultimately trying to chase a high win rate and if it wasnt a high win rate, it wasnt good enough.

A few losses would throw me off my process leading to over-leveraging, adjust entries on the fly, taking unplanned trades or skipping planned trades - just to name a few.

What's key to understand is that profitability isn’t about avoiding losses. It’s about expectancy.

Consider a simple model:

Account size: $100,000
Risk per trade: 1% ($1,000)
Win rate: 45% (45 wins, 55 losses)
Reward/Risk: +2R on wins, -1R on losses
Outcome after 100 trades: $135,000 (+35%)
Expectancy: +0.35R per trade

Even with a win rate below 50%, this system has positive expectancy, carries edge, and produces profits.

It isn’t flawless, yet there is so much room for improvement with a focus on trade selection, timing, and risk allocation, applying a better filter to select A+ trades and sizing up on them.

But the foundation is solid. Journaling and reviewing are what transform a basic edge into a sharper, more consistent one over time.

The math is simple. The real challenge is staying the course long enough to let it play out.

Most aspiring traders never make it to 100 trades because they are rattled by variance, size up too quickly, or abandon their process after a drawdown and eventually blow up, been there and done it many times in 2018-2019.

I would get to around 30-40 trades before taking a huge loss (-50% drawdown or completely blowing out) - hence of my "trading goals" was just to make it through to 100 trades, amongst many goals at that time.

The true edge isn’t just in the numbers, it’s in the discipline to stick to the process and the patience to refine it (the real work away from staring at the screen all day). That’s what separates compounding from blowing up.

Its a tough game to crack, let the numbers show you the way. Dont think about the end goal but the process that will help you get there.

[Bet More @BetMoreOnSol]

Act like you got a pair and bet more

[XO @Trader_XO]

Hows your pattern recognition skills....