A MIT student told me he learns any new subject using a framework a self-taught Victorian mathematician published in 1854.
Most people have never heard of it outside of computer science.
He applies it to everything. Economics. Biology. History. Law.
And it's the fastest way to actually understand a subject I've ever seen.
The mathematician was George Boole. The book was called The Laws of Thought.
Boole's core idea was simple and radical. Every complex system, no matter how messy it looks on the surface, can be broken down into a set of basic relationships that are either true or false.
You don't need to understand everything at once. You need to find the fundamental propositions the whole system is built on, and then trace the logic forward from there.
He built it to map how the human mind actually reasons. MIT uses it to build computer chips. This student uses it to learn anything in a fraction of the time.
Here's exactly what he does.
Before touching any course material, he opens Claude and runs one prompt.
"What are the 5 foundational propositions of this subject? Not facts, not definitions. The statements that, if true, make everything else in this field follow logically."
That question is doing something most students never force themselves to do. It finds the load-bearing walls of the subject before you walk into the building.
Then he runs the second prompt.
"For each of these propositions, what is the one piece of evidence that would destroy it? What would have to be true for this entire framework to be wrong?"
Boole's insight was that a proposition you can't falsify isn't really a proposition at all. It's just a belief dressed up as knowledge. This prompt separates the two instantly.
The third prompt is the one that makes it unfair.
"Now show me how these five propositions connect to each other. Which ones are assumptions? Which ones are conclusions? Which ones are in tension?"
By the time he finishes those three prompts he doesn't have a summary of the subject. He has a map of how it thinks.
His classmates spend the semester adding details to a picture they never drew. He drew the picture before week one and spends the semester filling it in.
Boole published this framework 171 years ago.
It runs every computer on earth.
And almost no one uses it to learn.
I was in class last week. One of my students raised their hand mid-lecture and asked something that stopped me for a second.
"Why is every AI tool built on Python? C++ is faster. Rust is faster. Even Java is faster. So why Python?"
Honestly it’s a fair question. And the answer reveals something really interesting about how the AI industry actually works.
Let me explain this properly. 🧵
No Kings explained for people who think they're fighting fascism.
You're standing in a crowd on Saturday. You look around and think yeah. No Kings. This is what democracy looks like.
Bro.
You're holding a sign made by a communist billionaire who lives in Shanghai.
You live in a constitutional republic.
Elections. Term limits. A free press that spent four years calling the president a fascist without one journalist being arrested.
The modern left's definition of fascism:
You love your country? Fascist.
You want to enforce the border? Racist.
You think parents should raise their kids? Bigot.
You want to know who's voting in your elections? Jim Crow.
Being patriotic is fascism to the modern left.
But every country has borders and enforces them. 176 countries require ID to vote. That's the definition of a country.
But the Democratic establishment told you otherwise. And you believed them.
Congress has a 15% approval rating. 80% of Americans disapprove. 97% of incumbents got re-elected.
Chuck Schumer. 46 years. Longer than Stalin.
Steny Hoyer. 45 years. Longer than Mao.
Mitch McConnell. 42 years. 5x more than Napoleon.
Nancy Pelosi. 39 years. Longer than Henry VIII.
Maxine Waters. 35 years. Longer than Mussolini.
Bernie Sanders. 35 years. Triple Hitler's entire reign.
Trump. 5 years and 3 months. Won the popular vote and the electoral vote.
But Trump is the king. Okay buddy.
You don't hate kings. You hate kings that aren't yours.
And Saturday they had you in the streets carrying their water.
The Democratic Party installed a president without letting you vote. Biden quit on a Sunday. By Tuesday your queen was crowned.
No primary. No debate. No ballot. First time since 1968.
Three days before your march every Senate Democrat voted against photo ID to vote.
During COVID you carried a vaccine card everywhere like a hall pass from the government just to eat at a restaurant.
But getting a birth certificate or waiting two hours at the DMV to prove you're a citizen before you vote? That's oppression.
The Democratic Party is pro illegal immigration.
Counts non-citizens in the Census. Census determines congressional seats. More non-citizens means more seats means more power. No voter ID means no way to check.
That's how you keep power without wearing a crown.
Biden built a censorship machine.
Pressured Facebook to suppress true information and admitted it in writing. Censored scientists. Censored doctors. Censored JOKES. The Biden White House told Facebook to remove "humor and satire."
They literally went after people for making fun of them. UK does it better tho...
Everything they censored turned out to be right. They just outsourced the silencing to Silicon Valley.
And it doesn't stop at speech.
The extreme left justifies taking children from families.
Six thousand schools rewrite children's identities without telling parents. And the State has the right to intervene.
The Hitler Youth did this. Mao's Red Guards did this. The Soviets built statues of a child who reported his own father.
Same playbook.
During Covid, your bakery got shut down. Church closed. You couldn't hold your dying mother's hand at the hospital.
But thousands packed together during BLM to burn Minneapolis and THAT was essential civic engagement. Obviously.
$2 billion in damage. 25 dead. 2,000 cops injured. 20 states burning. VP Kamala promoted a bail fund for the rioters. No investigation. No hearings.
January 6. One building. Few hours. 1,000 prosecuted. Two years of televised hearings.
Kings decide which violence counts. The left decided.
Charlie Kirk spent his life walking onto campuses asking for honest debate. He was assassinated.
CSIS terrorism database. 2025 is the first year in 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumber right-wing. Yet no one brings this up.
75% of liberal students say preventing a speaker from talking is justified. 27% say violence is acceptable.
Liberals who went to Trump rallies: "I never felt unsafe." "The experience changed me."
Conservatives who show up on liberal campuses get screamed at, blocked, and assassinated.
One side talks. The other side screams.
The Party for Socialism and Liberation marched with you Saturday.
Their stated purpose in their own words: "Revolution." Not reform. Marxism.
The system that killed a hundred million people last century. They had you holding their signs while they said it out loud.
500 groups. $3 billion in revenue. Pre-printed signs. The signs were ready before you were angry.
The money leads to Neville Roy Singham. Billionaire in Shanghai. Attends CCP workshops. Funnels millions through shell companies at UPS mailboxes. Three Congressional committees have subpoenaed him as a suspected CCP foreign agent.
You thought you were fighting for democracy. You were carrying water for Beijing.
"Liberals are leaving the First Amendment behind." Spoken by the ACLU lawyer who defended Nazis in court because it was their constitutional right.
Bill Clinton put 100,000 cops on the street. Reformed welfare. Said illegal immigration is wrong to a standing ovation. Told America the era of big government is over.
Today his own party would call him a fascist.
The 1990s Democrat defended free speech for Nazis. Yours censors doctors for telling the truth.
The 1990s Democrat held open primaries. Yours installed a nominee without a vote.
The 1990s Democrat trusted parents. Yours takes their children.
Historians measure fascism across eight traits. Here's who checks the boxes in 2026:
Censorship of political opposition. Democrats.
Contempt for democratic process. Democrats.
Tolerance of political violence. Democrats.
State ideology forced on families. Democrats.
Corporate-state fusion. Democrats.
Scapegoating and manufactured enemies. Both sides.
Cult of personality. Both sides.
Ultranationalism. Republicans.
Five for the left. One for the right. Two shared.
You marched against kings on Saturday.
You marched FOR kings.
You just didn't know which was which.
Stop being gaslit.
I hope you understand what's at stake.
A brilliant statistician who spent 50 years studying why massive engineering projects fail realized one terrifying truth:
Individual incompetence is almost never the actual problem.
His name is W. Edwards Deming, the man who famously rebuilt Japan's post-war manufacturing empire from scratch. He argued that we obsess over individual performance and completely ignore the environment.
Here are 4 operational frameworks he used to build elite, failure-proof organizations:
Dear Democrats,
Since you've made it crystal clear that requiring an ID to exercise a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT is "disenfranchisement" and "the new Jim Crow," I have a proposal.
The Second Amendment is a constitutional right. Voting is a constitutional right. You claim requiring ID to vote suppresses people from exercising their right. Okay. Then requiring ID to purchase a firearm suppresses people from exercising THEIR right. Same logic. Same constitution. Same argument.
So here's my challenge to every Republican in Congress: introduce a bill TOMORROW that eliminates ALL identification requirements for purchasing firearms. No background checks. No ID. No waiting periods. Nothing. If Democrats truly believe that ID requirements prevent citizens from exercising constitutional rights, they'll HAVE to support it. Right?
...right?
Watch how fast they twist themselves into pretzels. "Well, THAT'S different because—" No. Stop. It's not different. You don't get to argue that an ID requirement is an unconstitutional burden on ONE right but a perfectly reasonable safeguard for ANOTHER. That's not how the Constitution works. Either ID requirements disenfranchise people or they don't. Pick one.
And let's be honest about what's really happening here. The party that created Jim Crow literacy tests, had a former KKK RECRUITER in Robert Byrd filibuster the Civil Rights Act for 14 hours, and segregated federal offices under Woodrow Wilson is now telling me that Black Americans can't figure out how to get a free government ID. India scans fingerprints for 1.4 BILLION voters. But apparently Americans are too helpless to show the same card they used to buy Sudafed on the way to the polls.
The SAVE Act passed the House requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. Democrats fought it tooth and nail. Why? What POSSIBLE reason would you oppose verifying that voters are citizens unless you NEED non-citizens on the rolls?
Quinn's Law #2: "If you want to know what liberals are up to, pay attention to what they accuse conservatives of doing." They scream "voter suppression" while fighting every measure to secure elections. They're not protecting rights. They're protecting a system they can manipulate.
So I'm dead serious. Put the bill on the floor. No ID for gun purchases. Call their bluff. Make them explain why an ID requirement is tyranny at the ballot box but common sense at the gun store. I'll bring the popcorn.
But what do I know? I'm just a guy who thinks constitutional rights should be treated equally — not selectively — depending on which ones the left finds politically convenient.
Activist: "Methane is 80 times worse than CO2."
Farmer: "For the first 20 years. Then it breaks down."
Activist: "That's still 20 years of warming."
Farmer: "Only if you're adding NEW methane. Stable herds are climate neutral."
Activist: "That doesn't sound right."
Farmer: "Methane from 2026 breaks down to CO2 by 2038. Grass absorbs that CO2 in 2038. Cycle complete."
Activist: "But it's still in the atmosphere..."
Farmer: "Temporarily. Like water vapor. Should we ban clouds too?"
Activist: "That's a false equivalence."
Farmer: "That's how biogenic carbon cycles work. Stock vs flow. Basic climate science."
Activist: "The IPCC doesn't frame it that way."
Farmer: "The IPCC uses GWP100 which doesn't distinguish biogenic from fossil methane. It's a known limitation of the metric."
Activist: "You can't just dismiss the IPCC."
Farmer: "I'm not dismissing it. I'm adding context you've conveniently ignored."
Brandishing a firearm. And for the goobers saying “there’s no such thing as brandishing in Minnesota,” congratulations on not understanding basic stuff. He’s on video attacking ICE. Malicious destruction of property. You can’t do that when carrying.
🚨HORRIFYING NEW DETAILS
The invasion of Cities Church was even worse than we thought.
Agitators blocked stairs so "parents were unable to get to their children" at Sunday School.😡
One told a kid, "Do you know your parents are Nazis, they're going to burn in hell?"
🧵1/7
This gruesome murder was done by two illegal immigrants from Venezuela. I wasn’t even aware of it, in fact had to confirm. There are so many. But you never hear any pastors or the Pope or fake Christians call attention to this. It’s always how we are supposed to open the border.
BREAKING:
Senator Dave McCormick (R-PA) — who won by 15,000 votes in 2024 — is now cosponsoring the SAVE Act.
“Since day one, I have always supported protecting our elections from illegal voting and ensuring ONLY American citizens are voting in our elections.”
Thank you, @SenMcCormickPA!
As a Pennsylvanian, thank you.
+1
There’s a lot of noise out there about what happened in Minneapolis today.
But what @ScottJenningsKY just told the CNN panel cuts through ALL of it.
This isn’t about one incident. This is a dangerous pattern within modern society.
JENNINGS: “It strikes me that we are undergoing an epidemic of political vigilantism right now.”
“Why are people showing up in vehicles, in convoys, not just in Minneapolis, but all over the country in an effort to obstruct lawful federal law enforcement activities?”
“This is not an isolated incident. We’ve had hundreds of car rammings against ICE agents across the country.”
“According to DHS, this lady in this car today, along with other vehicles, had been tracking ICE agents around. Why are people believing that they can drive their car into a federal law enforcement situation, and that’s somehow appropriate?”
“I understand they don’t like the fact that these agents are enforcing existing immigration law… but that’s not how we change laws in this country.”
“If you don’t like the law, you talk to politicians. You don’t drive your car into the middle of a building or a law enforcement situation.”
“If I don’t like how much the IRS is charging me in taxes, I don’t drive my car into the Treasury Department. I call my congressman.”
“Political vigilantism is being encouraged by Democratic officials like Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, who earlier this year told people to, quote, ‘put your bodies on the line.’”
“And Governor Tim Walz has been calling these guys Gestapo all year.”
“What do you think happens when you radicalize a base of people like this?!”
People often say that the developing world is poor because the Western world colonized them and stole their resources.
The truth, however, is that over the past century, the developing world has, for the most part, shown that they are completely incapable of harnessing their own resources. They are not poor because we stole from them. They are poor because they do not know how to run and administer their own countries, resources be damned.
Take Venezuela. The world's largest oil reserves mean nothing if you have a corrupt communist as your leader. People will actually be starving and trying to eat zoo animals while you sit on trillions of dollars in resources!
Africa is another example. Europeans left behind farmland, trains, roads, and mines in Africa. What happened to it all?
It's not that all of a sudden, the Africans started running things like anti-colonialist activists had envisioned at the time. No, no.
All the infrastructure fell into disrepair and/or was stripped down and looted. They were literally handed fully functioning, completed supply chains for resource extraction, and basically unlimited wealth, but they couldn't manage the simple upkeep.
Now, the defense for Africa might be that "The Europeans didn't teach the Africans how to manage any of this! It's not the Africans' fault they couldn't run it independently! They were never trained!"
But my brother in Christ, the Europeans DID try to train locals for management! Obviously it would have been easier to have at least some locals in administration, rather than having to import an ENTIRE workforce, but efforts to find African talent were largely unsuccessful.
Don't believe me? Just look at the different outcomes in Hong Kong and Singapore when compared to Africa. In East Asia, Europeans often did work with locals in administrative and management capacities. When colonialism ended, Hong Kong and Singapore were able to manage themselves. Not the case with Africa.
Now, none of this is to say that colonialism is good. People have the right to self-rule and seld-determination. However, the idea that colonialism and resources extraction are responsible for the developing world's ongoing poverty? That is quite simply a crock of shit.