@TJLang70 Packers and their fans migrating from actually being better than the Bears to now trying to prove it on Twitter is a wonderful thing to witness lmao
That said, @TJLang70 is right on one thing, Williams trying to trademark Iceman is corny as hell.
@cswilliams63@reachjulieroys@DrSteveNichols@StephenAdams26 Is it substantive enough for a police conviction? Maybe and maybe not. But we can make the best conclusion that we can without the presumption of innocence required in a court of law.
Maybe you come to a different conclusion than Julia, and that's fine. But something ain't right
@cswilliams63@reachjulieroys@DrSteveNichols@StephenAdams26 Nothing substantive? Have you read the article? The daughter telling her therapist about SA by Adams is pretty damning. Homie also "forgot" about being nude with some nude students??? Where there's smoke there's fire, and there's so much smoke here it's crazy.
@StephenAdams26 So all this tells me is that a thorough police investigation is needed. Most likely nothing will come out of it given the abuser covered their tracks well (like by using a burner phone), but hopefully an investigation will bring forward other victims if Adams is lying.
@StephenAdams26 When people are accused of this type of thing (sexual abuse/assault), I have never heard of them telling the truth, at least at first.
I'm not saying this guy is lying, I'm just saying none of this can be trusted because this is what he would say either way.
@greg_scott@megbasham To put your personal interpretation of scripture (or that of anyone else) above the creeds would be really dangerous grounds.
The Bible is the final word and is above the creeds, but the Apostles Creed and Nicean Creed narrow down what the non-negotiables are within scripture.
@greg_scott@megbasham I believe this tweet is made in good faith, but it has a profound lack of respect for those creeds. The creeds were created to isolate what the Bible says is non-negotiable and have been widely regarded as such for centuries. 1/2
@JarranSainsbury I'm not one to defend Josh Howerton, but at least he says, "If I understand correctly" before he made it abundantly clear he does not understand correctly lmao...
@jrmiller777@megbasham He literally didn't take a stand though, so it's worth saying...
Read the Tweet.
Think about it, in pursuit of comprehension of the tweet.
Then respond.
When you're arguing with this you're just arguing against reading lol