@THENEWOmegan I don't mind as long as they claim it is canon or whatever in that sense. Artist can express the character anyway they want (including more gooning or beyond) even if it might not be my go-to design (I agree that Blaze original design is already perfect without any curves).
@deltaIV9250 NASA is always the same just political priority change. And the true is most American didn't care about space enough since NASA founding even in Apollo era, and even then it is the push of US government at that time that make it happened.
@deltaIV9250 So any generic bad guy country ever just who supplier them. You also can saw tbose country as Russia-Ukraine also. It is one country want others territory.
@deltaIV9250 Problem is trust and Trump didn't make US trust worthy enough or actually he didn't interested enough to even 'try to look' serious. Maybe because he has soft spot for Russia or whatever but this is clear that he just didn't want to put any effort to.
@sbarky38 Because at the end of the day... it is the same thing? (version, block, type etc.) And they (SpaceX) also use both interchangeabley in many cases.
@deltaIV9250 Companies gained industrial knowledge from each generations and prototypes but not 'directly' link as different planes have different requirements and clean sheet design.
@deltaIV9250 It came down to type of gov. Of course NASA (or US gov)can encourage the industy to do it but they can't order or force them to do unlike CCP.
I can see the benefit of Chinese model but I still think let the industry organically grow and adpat (or die) is better in the long run.