I DO NOT KNOW HOW MANY YOUNG MEN WILL HAVE TO TAKE THEIR LIVES TO HAVE SUCH RIDICULOUSLY BIASED LAWS CHANGE
Section 69 has to be the most absurd law across the universe. A woman can cry false promise of marriage and make a man accused of a heinous sexual offence when that man has not even touched her. No proof needed. No questions by police. No questions by law. FIR registered and a man branded as sex offender. His family immediately tortured and harrassed unless they fill the pockets of police.
Requesting @tnpoliceoffl@erd_smc@actorvijay@CMOTamilnadu to kindly take action in this case and give justice to family of P Vignesh and ARREST THIS WOMAN AISHWARYA
Ever heard of a strong and independent man? No. Parents always teach sons to be strong and responsible.
The same parents teach their daughters to be strong and independent.
The real reason for promoting girl child education was not to push all girls into jobs. The real reason was that, if girls are educated, and something happens to the husband, she won't be left destitute. She can earn owing to her education and take care of kids.
Education and having a career never meant that girls should be discouraged from learning household work, and encouraged only to study and do a job. Doing a job was supposed to be a voluntary activity. But, somehow the society has been conditioned to think that a corporate job is the only logical step after education, otherwise education is wasted.
Today, in most of the urban areas, I see a reverse trend. Most of the guys are good in household work - cooking & chores, whereas several women can't cook beyond a cup of coffee, and a bowl of maggi.
So, I would say, on an average, men have stepped up by learning additional skills, and women have stepped down by changing one skill with another. And even with the money earning skill, many of these women don't contribute in running the househould, but rather they are independent (spend on their personal expenses).
समान शिक्षा❌
समान चिकित्सा❌
समान कर संहित���❌
समान दंड संहिता❌
समान न्याय संहिता❌
समान चुनाव संहिता❌
समान पुलिस संहिता❌
समान संपत्ति संहिता❌
समान व्यापार संहिता❌
समान नागरिक संहिता❌
समान धर्मस्थल संहिता❌
समान नामकरण संहिता❌
समान जनसंख्या संहिता❌
@narendramodi @PMOIndia
#LoveLottery
A movie that talks about the misuse of women centric gender biased laws is releasing on 25th Sep 2026. Watch it with friends and families.
मध्य प्रदेश- 'लाड़ली बहना योजना' बंद कराने हाईकोर्ट पहुंची महिला: 1.25 करोड़ महिलाओं को मंथली ₹1500 की किस्त पर रोक लगे, योजना पर सालाना खर्च ₹22,500 करोड़ से ज्यादा; महिला ने क्यों लगाई याचिका और सरकार ने क्या कहा
https://t.co/v6JAJB6ofl
#MPNews#HindiNews#LadliBahnaYojana #MPHighCourt #CMMohanYadav
Being falsely accused of a criminal offence can be one of the most stressful experiences a person faces. Panic, however, is often the biggest mistake.
The first priority is understanding the nature of the offence and assessing the risk of arrest. In serious cases, timely legal advice and appropriate bail strategy can make all the difference.
From the investigation stage itself, it is important to ensure that relevant evidence supporting your defence is brought to the attention of the investigating agency. Many accused persons focus only on securing bail and ignore the investigation, only to discover later that important facts were never properly recorded.
Once the investigation is complete, the next step is to evaluate whether the case is fit for discharge, quashing, or trial. Every stage requires careful preparation and strategic decision-making.
If the matter proceeds to trial, the outcome often depends on meticulous cross-examination, effective presentation of defence evidence, and well-structured final arguments.
False cases are rarely won through emotion. They are won through patience, preparation, documentation, and a clear legal strategy from the very beginning.
Some print media outlets are consistently covering men’s rights issues, including campaigns like #AlimonyGopal
Thank you @aajkaanand for taking this issue seriously.
It’s high time other media houses also give this issue the attention & coverage.
@SakalMediaNews@NavrashtraTimes
Men’s struggles were never absent from cinema. They were simply treated as too ordinary to deserve sympathy.
A woman suffers: society sees a victim.
A man suffers: society asks why he wasn’t stronger.
His money is responsibility.
His sacrifice is duty.
His loneliness is weakness.
His pain is entertainment.
Men were never taught to expect empathy. They were taught to remain useful while suffering.
So don’t ask, “Where are films about men’s struggles?”
Ask why a man has to be destroyed before society even admits he was hurting.
Source : Flicksandfunnys
#MensRights #MensIssues #MaleStruggles #ShoneeKapoor
#Jeevansathi match. Two months of marriage talks. One small detail allegedly hidden: SHE ALREADY HAD A HUSBAND.
When caught? “#Divorce hone wala hai. I was going to tell you.”
Going to tell him WHEN? After fixing the wedding date?
If this account is true, this wasn’t matchmaking. It was deception dressed as matrimony.
#Men, verify before you trust.
Source : _shwe_00
Pune Metro mein seedha sawaal.
“Kya pehna hai bhai?”
Aajkal 30-40 din ki shaadi, phir lifetime squeeze. Settlement ke naam pe ladke ko lifetime bond.
Alimony Gopal. 40 days marriage. 40 years alimony.
Log pooch rahe hain — madad karte ho?
Haan. Bas …. Yahi campaign hai.
This picture brings tears to our eyes.
It was December 2024 when we lost our brother, Atul Subhash.
A brilliant AI engineer. A man who had built his career through hard work and intelligence.
His “fault”?
He trusted the justice system of this country.
He trusted marriage.
And he believed that if something went wrong, the law would protect him.
We all know what happened next.
His death should never become just another forgotten headline.
Remember Atul.
Remember his pain.
And remember the questions his death raised about our justice system.
Women are committing crimes.
India needs to review and abolish gender-biased, women-centric laws and replace them with gender-neutral laws. False dowry and Domestic Violence cases—when deliberately filed to harass, intimidate or extort—must carry meaningful consequences.
Just now got a call from a friend who has a matrimonial dispute in court.
The wife has filed the entire package of cases she has against the husband.
For several months, she was crying about fast-tracking these cases.
Now the cross-examination time came.
And suddenly, she started denying.
As soon as the questions from the husband’s advocate started, the wife started denying the very lines she had written in her own pleadings/documents.
She was even saying:
“I don’t know what documents are filed. They were filed by my advocate, not me. I have no knowledge.”
The judge, as usual, appeared more concerned about protecting her and said:
“Why are you asking her about the details of the documents?”
The husband’s advocate replied:
“Then those documents can be rejected outright, because she herself is claiming that she doesn’t know about them.”
The wife started crying.
Her advocate tried to save her.
And then came another alternate route they always use:
“We have to compromise.”
Her advocate said it.
Judge: “Yes, then?”
Husband’s advocate:
“I have been hired for cross-examination. Let me complete the cross-examination first. Then we can see the other things later.”
Judge:
“No, no… wait.”
And that was it.
Next week, let’s see what happens. 😏