Taiwan is not part of China. It is an independent country and a free democracy. The CCP has never ruled Taiwan and the people of Taiwan don’t want to be ruled from Beijing.
The Chinese Communist Party bears direct responsibility for the deadly COVID-19 outbreak.
The world deserves the truth, and the CCP must answer for the Wuhan abomination, @milesyu10 argues in the @WashTimes
https://t.co/hVQo6eoJyP
360+ km. 10 Tibetans. One powerful message.
From Paonta Sahib to Dharamshala, ten Tibetan volunteers cycled through heavy monsoon rains to honour Lobga Rangzen, stand against Beijing’s so-called “Ethnic Unity and Progress Law,” and say Thank You, India for standing with Tibetans.
They rode for freedom. They rode for identity. They rode for Tibet.
#Tibet #FreeTibet #LobgaRangzen #ThankYouIndia #TibetanFreedom #EthnicUnityLaw #CCP #China #TibetWillBeFree #StandWithTibet
I see the black bros are united. According to them Dr Arday died at the hands of the media.
Tosh.
The media did its job by exposing him as a liar / fantasist. It’s their job.
Regrettably Cambridge University didn’t do theirs.
Had they, Dr Arday would never have been hired in the first place
Lord Woolley the black ( important in this debate) principal of Cambridge Uni’s Homerton, College says there should be an inquiry into the “ vicious media onslaught.”
It’s all crap.
The bros liked the praise when he landed the job but hated it when the reality was laid bare.
When the message emerged he wasn’t a hero but basically mentally unwell, they had to find someone to blame.
A garbled paraphrase of this post was put to Jolyon Maugham in a BBC News Channel interview today. He rejected it as “lies”. It is not. The “donate” button on the GLP’s petition page, which was present until at least 3.30pm today has since been removed. See my timed screenshots
@jfwduffield It's just bish, bash, bosh with a group of disparate batsmen in coloured outfits, playing a manufactured game. But one thing is for sure, that game isn't cricket.
Tibet is a Nation and not a minority. We will never stop fighting until taking back our country- Tibet from Terrorist group. Break your silence @UN@UNHumanRights#CCP 🇨🇳
When you've lost even the @guardian, the game is up.
"Lab leak likely" is now all but universally conceded except in a few diehard corners of the BBC, @Nature etc.
A little credit to those who made it possible would be nice.
Read about the @SpeechUnion’s latest case in the @telegraph:
“Prosecuting people for making jokes about Islam, particularly if they contain a kernel of truth, is a new low,” I told the paper.
“No one making a similar joke about Jesus would face prosecution. Blasphemy laws were abolished in England 18 years ago and should not be resurrected by the courts and applied to just one religion.
“If Labour wants to make it a criminal offence to offend Muslims, but not Christians, Hindus, Sikhs or Buddhists, Andy Burnham should include that in the next King’s Speech. Good luck getting it through parliament.”https://t.co/OlzpAGShOm
Sharing a joke - however distasteful or offensive - should never be an offence. Bearing in mind:
"discussion, criticism or expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents, or of any other belief system or the beliefs or practices of its adherents"
is expressly protected under s.29J POA '86.
Surely an offensive joke comes within "abuse" or "insult" and thus not an offence.
The problem? s.29J does not act as a defence to a s127 charge, which calls for any "message or other matter" that is "grossly offensive" to be prosecuted.
This had led to courts convicting on the latter whilst ignoring the obvious free speech implications expressly codified in the POA - which, I aver - are absolutely relevant to a s.127 offence and should be taken into account.
And that's before we consider that we abolished blasphemy offences 18 years ago for this very reason.
In short, in my respectful view, this is an abuse of our laws to shoehorn jokes pegs into an offence holes, and is entirely unacceptable.
Until last week, men over 50 were entitled to a free PSA prostate cancer check. But the government has now decided to withdraw that right. I cannot for the life of me work out what their reasoning might be.