@Rvandepas@KristofDecoste1@mmi_updates But then U give up on democratic ownership. partner countries are often financially too weak to resist, see work of Barnes et al. on the international politics behind PBF. See also the effect of MDGs on pol priorities Aid = politics but should be depoliticized as much as possible
Does without ideology also mean without ideas? The issue is different: HSS should be nationally owned (with ideology) and international aid should be pragmatic (without ideology). Regardless of PBF or not https://t.co/OKJzwl5G1H
@maryam_bigdeli@H_S_Global@governance_hs True! Yet more autonomy should come with more supervision and should not lead to an abdication from the part of the local health structures. Hence, might even ask more from the governance structures.
Donors should indeed stop talking about frameworks & definitions! Researchers in global health on the other hand should make more of an effort! And add theories to that! https://t.co/Inpms5dhHI
Powerful message from @bobfryatt "We need to stop talking about frameworks & definitions. We need to make investments where there is compelling evidence of the impact on health. By doing this we will expand essential services to those who need it." #Governance4UHC@H_S_Global
Two papers in a row - see also https://t.co/UOS1LOsIP3 by @DRenmans - we are about to launch a collaborative project on ToC of PBF https://t.co/k4Z41eEFQS