Once you're kidnapped and you have access to your phone, don't panic. Don't call the police.
Go to twitter, insult the President, the and the Chief of Army Staff. Make sure you write their full names in the insult. Within 3 to 6 hours the Army and the police will locate you.
Pan-Africanism is not a dream. It is the intellectual and political architecture that dismantled the legal infrastructure of your enslavement. The men and women who built this “pipe dream” Du Bois, Nkrumah, Padmore, Fanon, Diop, Nyerere just to name thee few, did not theorize from comfort.
You are confusing the difficulty of a project with its illegitimacy. Every liberation movement in history looked like a pipe dream to those who had internalized the permanence of their own subjugation.
As for “the black man hating each other” you are describing a symptom and calling it a diagnosis. “Divide and rule” is not an African invention. It was the administrative backbone of every colonial system that carved this continent into artificial borders, pitted ethnic groups against each other for access to resources, and then pointed at the resulting conflict as evidence that Africans were ungovernable by themselves.
Libraries don’t build roads you comfortably claim. Neither do roads build themselves. And yet somehow, before making such simplistic argument you did not even pause to ask where roads come from.
Roads are built by engineers. Engineers are trained in institutions. Institutions are built on curricula. Curricula are assembled from knowledge. Knowledge is recorded, preserved, transmitted, and debated in libraries. The road begins with a surveyor, a city planner, an economist, a financial analyst, and a lawyer to draft the legal framework. Every single node in that chain runs through a library meaning “education”. To separate the physical output from the intellectual infrastructure that produced is a failure to read the production chain all the way back to its origin.
What you are expressing is not a critique of Pan-Africanism but a critique of thinking itself. The man who says “stop theorizing and start building” has never built anything complex enough to require a plan. And if you want to understand why the library itself has been kept deliberately thin on this continent, follow the money.
African governments do not lack roads because they lack the will to build them.
They lack roads, the factories, the schools because the system within which they operate was designed to convert African resources into foreign wealth, and to keep the conversion rate permanently favorable to the extractor. The structural adjustment programs imposed by the IMF and World Bank made the dismantling of public education and public health a condition of debt rescheduling. You were not allowed to fund your universities. You were not allowed to subsidize your schools. You were explicitly required, in writing, as a condition of receiving loans denominated in currencies you did not control, to defund the very institutions that produce the engineers who build the roads you are now demanding.
And then, having systematically defunded African education for three consecutive decades, the same intellectual tradition that designed those programs turns around and says: two centuries of diagnosis, and still no Singapore.
The debt itself is the mechanism. African countries borrow in dollars. They service that debt in dollars. To accumulate enough dollars to service the debt, they must export raw materials at prices set by commodity markets they do not control, to buyers whose processing industries capture ninety percent of the final value. The cocoa leaves Ghana and returns as chocolate. The cotton leaves Benin and returns as fabric. The copper leaves Congo and returns as wire. The margin between what leaves and what returns is the sum total of what was never available to build the road, fund the school, or set up the factories.
The Pan-Africanist library that you dismissed is, in large part, precisely the archive of that accounting, assembled by people who understood that you cannot solve a problem whose architecture you have been trained not to see.
You do not build a state by waking up one morning and deciding to build. You build it by first understanding why it has not been built, who benefits from it remaining unbuilt, and what structural conditions must change before the building can begin and stay standing. That requires research, planning, systems thinking and design and advocacy. And that is exactly what Pan-Africanism does.
A special message for the Africans whose only contribution to this continent is telling Pan-Africanists to stop complaining !!!
You have written nothing. Built nothing. Documented nothing. Organized nothing. Sacrificed nothing. Contributed nothing. Your entire political existence is a posture of exasperation directed at the people who are actually in the arena. And yet here you are, with the confidence that only total inaction can produce, telling us we are playing victims; we are making excuses and we should move on.
Move on from what, exactly? You cannot answer that because you have not read enough to know what we are moving on from. You have not done enough to know what moving on would even require. You have not built enough to understand what is still actively working against everything we are trying to construct.
And the most revealing part is this: Pan Africanism is two centuries old. It is a school of thought so vast, so rigorous, so multi-disciplinary that it has produced mathematicians, historians, sociologists, researchers, philosophers, economists, and activists across generations and continents. It has given us Du Bois, Nkrumah, Fanon, Rodney, Cabral, Diop, Garvey, and an entire intellectual tradition that has diagnosed, documented, and proposed solutions to the domination of this continent and its descendants from every conceivable angle. It has survived colonialism, the assassination of its leaders, the banning of its literature, the defunding of its institutions, and the full machinery of Western interference, and it is still here, still producing, still organizing, still building.
And you, after two centuries of facing the most sophisticated intellectual and political tradition this struggle has ever produced, what have you brought to counter it? What is your school of thought? What is your framework? What is your counter-analysis? Where are your historians, your economists, your researchers? Where is the body of work that dismantles what Fanon built, what Rodney documented, what Nkrumah architected?
Because if it exists, we have not seen it. What we have seen is a posture. A recurring, content-free, evidence-free posture of exasperation that has not produced a single original thought in 200 years of trying. “You are ranting” is not a rebuttal. “You are making excuses” is not an alternative framework. “Stop playing victim” is not a school of thought. It is the absence of one, dressed up as common sense.
Your contribution to African liberation is criticizing the people contributing to African liberation. That is it! That is the whole resume. Delivered with such conviction, such righteous irritation, as if exhaustion with the people doing the work is itself a form of the work.
Well, it is not!
It is the oldest trick in the colonial playbook, and the most tragic part is that you are running it on yourself, against your own people, for free, without anyone even asking you to.
Pan Africanism has a library. What you have is a mere complaint. And the complaint is always the same, which is itself the most damning evidence of the intellectual bankruptcy we are dealing with.
The system that underdeveloped this continent could not have designed a more useful product than an African who polices other Africans for talking about the system. You are not “realist” as you so claim to be. Neither are you a “pragmatist”. You are not even a critic.
What you are is a volunteer in the service of those we are fighting to liberate you and your descendants from. And to make matters worse, you do not even receive a stipend for your servitude. You are the most committed unpaid intern in the history of oppression. Doing the night shift, on call on weekends all for free.
My problem is not whether anybody hates Muslims or not. I'm not religious and anyone has the right to hate whoever or whatever they want. My problem is that if you truly believe that "Muslims are killing Christians" in search of some "Islamic Caliphate", and you are serious about opposing them, then you should want to find out who is funding these "Muslims", who is supplying them military equipment, and who is constantly providing all kinds of political, diplomatic and material support for them.
If you believe in something, follow it all the way through. Go down the rabbit hole and don't stop until you've found what you're looking for. Once upon a time, when I had the same ideas about "Muslims", that was what I set out to do. Because that is the logical next step of opposing something. You should want to find out everything you can about this enemy so that you can disrupt it. So back in 2021, I set out to find out everything I could about these "Muslims" and the big masquerades behind them - and those masquerades turned out to be in Tel-Aviv and Washington DC. That was when I realised that "Muslims" were the least of my problems.
I thought my search would terminate in Doha or Riyadh or Amman - instead it turned out that even the Saudis and Qataris who incubated these awful Wahabbi/Salafi doctrines were just proxies of White, Christian/Jewish empire builders in Washington, London, Paris and Tel-Aviv. The "Muslims" were in fact, not involved in the decision making and they were basically powerless. The people who created the ISIS, Boko Haram, Al-Qaida etc were western empire-seekers who wore suits and spoke English, and the purpose of those terror outfits was not to create some "Islamic caliphate" but to seize land and resources for said white men!
And that's when my mental shift happened. The simple realisation that "Muslims" were at best useful idiots in this scheme, and that the REAL enemy were the people I used to hang out with at Bogobiri and the US Consular General's residence. I had that epiphany because I followed that rabbit hole down to the end and found the actual horrible truth. But most of you have no such balls. You are satisfied to just hear and repeat a narrative without ever trying to confirm it for yourself and take action based on that narrative.
This was the same problem I had with the Obidient people. I was ready to go to fucking WAR for what I wanted in 2023, and I lit myself on fire in ways that I am still recovering from. I escaped an international kidnapping attempt, I survived an attempt on my life, I spent months hopping around Nairobi short lets like a homeless person, and I would have done it all again if that was what it took to get that mandate. But most of you that claimed to support the same candidate had no such motivation. Your own was to sit on the internet and type "A new Nigeria is PO-ssible" and "All eyes on the judiciary" to zero fucking effect. And since that didn't work out, half of you have moved to APC, and the other half are still stuck in a 2022 - 2023 time loop, repeating the same tired nonsense that had no effect.
As I said earlier today, you people have no real convictions or beliefs about anything. All you do is make noise for a short while, then you go back to the shallow, stupid things that are actually the centre of your lives like sports betting, visa hunting and talking about relationships. Nothing you people say comes from a place of genuine thought or conviction - you're just a bunch of internet performance artists. Even the "Muslims" you claim are genociding you - if one of them flashes small 100k at you, your entire perspective will shift instantly. You don't believe anything you are saying, which is why I pity that Mossad asset that thinks he's going to instigate a civil war in Nigeria.
He has no idea how useless the people he's trying to instigate really are. Except he will bring mercenaries to fight the war on both sides, nobody is dying for whatever they claim to believe in Nigeria. The most they will do is talk everlasting amounts of shit at each other on the internet, and then switch up completely once they see money, food, or breast. They only came to this world to eat, shit, fuck, sleep, and die in that order. Anyone taking them seriously is just wasting his agency's budget. Even their civil war had to be fought and supported on both sides by foreign powers because they couldn't do it themselves.
I'm only afraid of an invasion.
I'm not afraid of Nigerians at all. Who dey fear mannequin?
@DanielRegha It says a lot when a Christian acknowledges an Imam publicly condemning wrong. This is the context people ignore when they generalize Muslims and Northerners. Muslim clerics preach positivity daily the problem is nobody amplifies it.
Women falsely accusing men of rape are single-handedly making it harder for real victims to get justice, and they either don't care or don't understand the consequences. Every fake accusation that gets exposed becomes a talking point for people who want to dismiss legitimate cases. Courts will become more skeptical, investigations more rigorous, and actual survivors will suffer through additional trauma just to be believed because someone else decided to weaponize their pain for personal gain.
You’re fine with chemical castration for the guilty but zero accountability for the liars who cause wrongful convictions? Your logic is dogshit. False accusers deserve the same smoke you’re giving rapists.
Bitch, we’re triggered because liars like the ones popping up daily send good men to jail, ruin families, and make real victims harder to believe. Your ‘if it bothers you, you’re part of the problem’ is a manipulative trash. It bothers us because false accusations are real, life ruining crimes too and you act like they don’t exist unless it fits your narrative. Selective feminist rage at its finest.
My parents had 4 daughters, and none of us have ever been sexually assaulted or raped. My mother was never raped, she married as a virgin. My grandmother was never raped either.
We have lived alongside men, shared spaces with them for extended periods, and they all respected boundaries without incident.
I once traveled alone and took a bike ride around 11pm, and the bike man didn't try to r@ped me. I have also lived alone in a compound as the only woman, and the men around me never threatened or tried to graped me.
This does not mean r@pe doesn't happen, but victims also bear some responsibility in certain situations.
It is interesting that you personally seem to know every woman who has been assaulted, yet you refuse to consider whether their own choices or actions played any role, and you reject any discussion of that.
You also completely ignore false rape accusations, which are quite common, and are even encouraged and celebrated by some of the very people you defend. Yet you expect others to take every claim seriously without question.
Where was your voice when that female teacher was sexually abusing an underage boy? Did you speak up to condemn it? Because if that kind of abuse goes unchallenged, what do you think happens to that boy as he grows up?
The conversation around sexual violence needs to be honest and complete. That means condemning all forms of abuse regardless of who the victim or perpetrator is, acknowledging that false accusations cause real damage, and having an open discussion about personal choices and safety.
Selective outrage helps no one. If you truly want change, you have to be willing to look at the full picture, not just the parts that support your argument.
If a non Hijabi wants to put on Hijab during this Ramadan, let them be.
If someone decides to stop sinning during this Ramadan, so what?
If a nominal Muslim decides to start praying during this Ramadan, so what?
Do not mock and call them fake Muslims. Verily, this month can change and make them better and more pious than you are.
You are not in any way perfect either. Let Allah be the judge.
May Allah accept all our Ibaadah in this Holy month of Ramadan.
#Ramadan2026
#Ramadan_2026
#RamadanKareem
#RamadanMubarak
Currently rewatching the blacklist and you people are seriously undermining reddington. Scofield is smart - no argument about that, he’s a very intelligent character who knows how to use one and two together to create something but come on, he’s no match for reddington. Scofield is a problem solver while reddington is a power architect.
This is the same reddington that made the FBI think they’re using him while he’s using them. The same reddington who staged a hostage situation to break marvin gerard out of prison. The same reddington who planned a heist to kidnap the director of the CIA. The same reddington who has doctors and surgeons on retainer in case anything happens to him. How do you even conceive this if you’re not smart? Reddington is the kind of man who will find your deepest, darkest secrets and use them against you. Heck, reddington is so smart that we don’t even know who the hell he really is. Red is the type of character that has a contingency plans for his contingency plans.
If scofield and reddington existed in the same universe, scofield would escape red’s facility, reddington would buy the company that built the facility, blackmail the warden, turn scofield’s allies and make scofield work for him without realizing it, that's the type of guy red is.
I think another reason people choose scofield (prison break) over red (the blacklist) is that the blacklist series somehow felt dragged on after elizabeth left (made no sense that her character died). But we’re not talking about the series here, we’re talking about each individual character and red is clear anyday anytime, unless you haven’t seen the blacklist.