@TechDeals_16@JarrodsTech@ADATATechnology If I could go back in time I would pay that for an SSD in 2010. If I knew then how much faster it would make my day to day user experience I wouldn't have thought twice. At the time though it was hard to imagine how much faster they were until you finally upgraded to one.
I’m going give someone random who retweets this tweet $10,000 because it’s my birthday and I feel like being nice ☺️ (you have to be following me so I can dm you the code if you win)
@Sestze2@Frups1 The problem is what happens when you are the one being silenced because some group of loud mouths doesn't like what you are saying. Hate speech is free speech. Actual calls to violence is a crime. Get rid of those. Silencing unpopular opinions is beyond a slippery slope.
@Sestze2@Frups1 And here is the final thing. You realize that to a bunch of people on the left, the very fact that you had a civilized conversation with me on the topic makes you "far right" in their mind. So should you banned next?
@Sestze2@Frups1 To defend a monopolistic company with worldwide power over so many aspects of life for no other reason than you dislike a few certain people is insane. Can't you put principles above your hatred for a few specific individuals.
@Sestze2@Frups1 Google right now is more of a monopoly and more powerful to change the world at it's whim than ATT ever was back in the day when it was broken up.
@Sestze2@Frups1 yeah we should have a free market dictate you can go somewhere else. Unfortunately as it is you can't. You do realize you can't possibly exist if google doesn't want you to exist. They have too much power worldwide. From buying and running domains, to visibility, etc.
@Sestze2@DepressedBrowns@SariTreks@Frups1@ParkerMolloy So buy pushing anti conservative stuff for a while if a conservative shoots up something and blames whiney liberals are you partly responsible? Not liking someones thoughts are not the same as an act of violence.
@Sestze2@Frups1 You didn't say anything here to say the argument is wrong.Clearly there is an issue.They shouldn't get to be in this middleground. The argument isn't that what is happening is illegal, the argument is THAT IT SHOULD BE. They are in a legally grey area that needs to be figured out
@Frups1 Except with that comes the legal responsibility of what's posted. But somehow they just get away with that. We live in a world where liberals are censoring things, are pro billionaire monopolies and defending them. When the fuck did that happen?
@Frups1 Must be nice to have all the complete freedoms of saying "legally we are just a publisher, the users are responsible for what's on our site" but at the same time actually edit and remove content and users on the basis of "we are a private company we can do that"