DunknFlicka

32
Previously banned for asking Pope Francis for a Square Go and arguing with Swifties.

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@TinyUndead299 @tarkov Technical difficulties don't require presents ya bunch of privileged little neeks

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@iwaniec_dale @LVNDMARK_tv Too illiterate to ragebait is crazy

[Everything Metal Gear ❗ @MetalGear_QWC]

THE BEST IS YET TO COME

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

I simply cannot imagine the pain Henry Nowak's family are currently going through - there are no words, so I'm not going to try.

Rest in peace, Henry.

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@xinexcellence @hippojuicefilm Using AI to make your point is wild

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@JakeSucky The dude got his IP leaked by this company that's a much bigger problem we are glossing over. We volunteered our information and they used it in malice. That breaks contractual agreement of the game that is straight breach of ToS.

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

The difference between 80 quid for a game and an 80 quid game are vastly different. Like Borderlands 4, 70 quid for mid. GTA is tried and tested it's often worth it's price point. Does mean other games are worth rh money. Economy collapse incoming for developer companies.

[Dexerto @Dexerto]

Grand Theft Auto VI should cost $80 according to a Bank of America analyst, so other games can follow

“We think it’s in Take-Two’s self-interest, as a publisher and partner to many developers, to raise the price point for the entire industry”

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@Benjami33335525 @tarik Fns is awful & the rest of the team don't like mooda

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@Benjami33335525 @tarik Mooda ain't getting in

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@RusPSY @HeyCallMeBlaze @JakeSucky You're a retard

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@JakeSucky Because he's not the best player Valorant has an ego problem

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@kkolozova @LillyLeii @Asmongold See maybe don't be an offendalot retard

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@JustJared25 @Kana__EXE @Dexerto @hasanthehun @Twitch So I guess your the Hasan retard group ltd

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@Blitserr @JakeSucky Shut the fuck up you snowflake

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@Dexerto So it's blackface now but not racist when druski whitefaced 2x perpetual victims sybau

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

So druski is allowed to intentionally do white face over a grieving widow. But you cannot make the same correlation when AI is automatic control. You gotta be fucking victims to be annoyed here

[Foskaay @SolomonFoskaay]

I dove deep into this viral controversy involving influencer Lauren Blake and her AI-edited photo that’s sparking major backlash online - here are the key verified facts in concise points:

The Incident:
Influencer Lauren Blake (a white content creator, influencer and model) posted an image on her Instagram where her face was digitally grafted onto the body of Tatiana Elizabeth Price, a Black model and former America's Next Top Model contestant.

The original photo came from a professional shoot Tatiana had done for a clothing brand. The AI edit slightly altered the skin tone but kept Tatiana’s distinct tattoos and body shape, making the manipulation immediately obvious to fans.

The Apology & Defense:
After the backlash, Lauren Blake issued a public apology, blaming an unnamed AI content agency she had hired to “enhance” her content. She claimed the agency used Tatiana’s body as a “base template” without her knowledge or full approval.

Critics and digital forensic experts pushed back, noting that as the account holder, she (or her immediate team) would have had to approve the final proof before posting, leading many to view the “agency excuse” as a deflection of personal responsibility.

Tatiana Elizabeth’s Response:
Tatiana Elizabeth publicly rejected the apology. She stated that Lauren’s response felt insincere and was “saying what she thinks she needs to say in order to move past this.”.

Many commentators framed the incident as a form of “digital blackface” or AI-driven cultural appropriation, where a white influencer profits off the aesthetic and physical labor of a Black woman.

Current Status (as of April 2, 2026):
The controversy continues to generate heated discussion across social media. The case has sparked a wider conversation about Right of Publicity laws in the age of AI. Legal experts are using this incident to highlight the need for stricter regulations on “face-swapping” for commercial gain.

This is a real, documented incident with verified posts from both Lauren Blake and Tatiana Elizabeth, along with widespread coverage on social media.

Share if this controversy caught your attention and drop your thoughts below:
Do you think this incident will lead to new laws requiring influencers to disclose when an image is an “AI composite” rather than a real photograph?

🙏 Kindly Follow me for more deep dives on trending events like this, news, sports, animals stories, aviation and more stories daily.

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@fps_gh0st @llol_andrew @ValorINTEL No Sinatra got banned until end of the investigation he refused so banned.

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@llol_andrew @ValorINTEL It wasn't naked that fucked Sinatra dipshit it was the he said she said bullshit with his ex both were as bad as each other but flo is a fucking sick individual

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@vxx_v_ @Carter__boy_ You beat your partners

[DunknFlicka @DunknFlicka]

@Hunter184537 @sarisu_mirura @Sentinels @SanDisk Nah low-key they are. Rob used tenZ clout to push all this hype then ended it with Jerrwin 😂 told us we were having steak gave us gristle