This is intellectual dishonesty, commenting on issue X and not on issue Y does not mean issue X is any less true or worth discussing. Both can be true at once and equally valid.
If that were the case, I could say that none of your concerns are legitimate because you don’t address every issue that goes on in the world which would be a ridiculous position to hold.
The “it violates international law” brigade is completely detached from the real world.
If you believe a thing can't take place because it's contrary to a specific doctrine it's childlike naivety.
Murder being illegal doesn't bring the person at gunpoint peace now does it?
@cilliandoyle87 I don't get your argument, are you arguing that once a country is far enough away it automatically stops being a threat?
Also Why would “defensive” be limited to just territorial concerns?
@Berlinnaeus Would you concede then if in the scarce case of rape or incest, abortion should be legal? However, all healthy babies conceived not of rape or incest can't be aborted?
@NiecyOKeeffe No comments on the bill that was trying to reduce the time of killing humans in the womb that's perfectly moral but killing foxes you're a dirt human?
Are those who voted in favour of removing the 3 days wait dirt humans too?