🔴⚖️ Angoulême (16) - Dans le contexte d'un rodéo sauvage, au volant d'une voiture volée, il percute de plein fouet et tue son ami de 17 ans à moto non homologuée pour la route et sans casque.
Dans une zone limitée à 30 km/h, Mohamed Z., 19 ans, roule en voiture à 70 km/h sur la même voie que Zainou, 17 ans, qui arrive à moto en face à environ 55 km/h.
Ils se percutent, Mohamed Z. se penche sur le corps de son ami qui soufre d'une rupture de l'aorte, puis il prend la fuite à pied.
L'un de leurs amis tente de brûler la voiture à quelques mètres du corps inerte de Zainou sans appeler les secours (prend 6 mois sous bracelet pour non-assistance et avoir tenté de brûler la voiture).
Mohamed Z. se rend aux autorités le lendemain, il est placé sous contrôle judiciaire.
3 mois après le drame, il viole son contrôle judiciaire en revenant en Charente pour « faire la fête » avec ses amis.
Il commet alors un vol de voiture avec violences et une nouvelle conduite sans permis.
Il est à noter qu'il avait également été contrôlé sans permis quelques semaines avant le drame.
Peine : 36 mois de prison + 12 avec sursis prob. + interdiction de passer le permis pendant 24 mois.
Peine encourue : 10 ans de prison.
(Source : La Charente Libre - Photo : J. Desbois)
Our statement on the UK government’s demand that all content on all devices sold or used in the country be scanned, on the presumption of nudity, using a dystopian combination of age verification and content scanning. This proposal will not safeguard children. It endangers us all.
https://t.co/VdWe9uhi8p
Ces saloperies de lunettes doivent être interdites par la loi et ne pas dépendre du règlement intérieur des établissements. (cette fois-ci exceptionnellement sans ironie sur l'interdiction).
Ça y est, on a notre première élève à lunettes connectées au collège.
Avec la bénédiction de sa mère qui dit qu'on peut pas lui faire enlever parce que ce sont aussi ses lunettes de vue.
Et nous on continue de distribuer des demandes d'autorisation pr prendre les élèves en photo.
how come when all these companies get caught using ai for simple shit they could do themselves their like 'HAHA IT WAS A MISTAKE SORRY HAHAHAHAH WE'LL REPLACE IT :)' Really they're just testing the waters until they can sneak AI in without anyone noticing.
@Badinguet3@ramenkj@LimonovEdouard@survivor_cm@badecofeminist@y__jr__ Entre le Chaman Glucksmanique (et non l'inverse), et les pierres de soin de la Sinistre des Spores de Macron, on est foutus, hein ?
On ne va même pas parler de la tendance LFI/EELVoynetiste, ça va me déprimer. Interdire tout ça.
One reason AI is being pushed so hard is because it's the last "humanity can capitalism its way out of all its problems" narrative that has yet to be fully discredited. The idea is that if we can just create AI gods and let them come up with the effective-yet-profitable innovative technological solutions to our various existential crises that our own fleshy brains have so far failed to produce, then we don't need to dismantle the socioeconomic system we built that is destroying our biosphere and driving us to our doom.
Embedded in this logic is the same baseless assumption that has been plaguing us this entire time: that there are effective-yet-profitable solutions to be found. That we can simply let the free market deliver us desirable products that will both (A) cause us to stop cannibalizing our ecosystem and (B) create billionaires and trillionaires. Capitalism hasn't provided any innovations that have allowed us to consume our way out of our problems thus far, but because we've got these complex new AI technologies now, we can allow ourselves to move this entirely faith-based assumption into the purview of our new gods.
But that's just it: it's an assumption based on blind faith. There is no reason to believe we'll ever come up with technologies that are conducive to human and environmental thriving which also generate shareholder profits. Generally profits are generated by producing and consuming more products, which is exactly what has gotten us into this mess in the first place.
What this means is that capitalism has no ability to solve the problems we're coming up against as a species. There is no way to compete and consume our way out of the hole we dug through competition and consuming.
We need new systems. Human behavior cannot continue to be driven by competition and the pursuit of profit. We need to move into collaboration with each other and with our biosphere if we are to survive into the future as a species, and we will be unable to do this if we are excluding all possible solutions that don't generate revenue for the capitalist class.
AI is for many people just a psychological box that allows us to avoid facing this uncomfortable truth, because as Mark Fisher said, “It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.” It's easier to imagine billionaire tech companies creating AI gods who will serve us up magical solutions to our urgent existential dilemmas which also facilitate continued economic growth than it is to imagine moving into collaboration-based systems where human behavior isn't driven by the pursuit of profit.
But that's just a sign of how insane our species has become. It's a symptom of our collective madness.
We need to wake up. We need to get real. It's adaptation or extinction time for us as a species, and that fork in the road is approaching very quickly.
@ratapignata2025 Achtually...
https://t.co/mwrVJZyfvC
L'Illiade s'arrête avec les funérailles d'Hector, le cheval est mentionné par Homère dans l'Odyssée (entre le fromage et la poire Belle Hélène), et détaillé dans l'Enéide par Virgile.