@FoxNews I think the UN was formed to arbitrate, resolve, or minimize conflict.
Why did they stage a workout when a major country in the conflict has its PM presenting its case?
It seems they are no longer in the business of conflict resolution but activism.
Debunking the Phantom Debts and Ecological Loan Fallacy
My attention has been drawn to trending claims by the Anambra State Government that my administration left behind inherited debts, including a โฆ2 billion ecological loan, contractor liabilities, and unpaid salaries, gratuities, and pensions. This is completely false.
We systematically liquidated historical gratuities and arrears dating back several years, amounting to over โฆ35 billion. At the point of handover, the state owed nothing in salaries, gratuities, or pensions, nor did we owe anything to any contractor for projects duly executed and certified.
The โฆ2 billion ecological fund in question was released barely three months before the end of my tenure for the Oko/Umuchiana erosion crisis. Despite pressure to spend the money, I refused, insisting that it should be left for my successor because government is a continuum and the funds were tied to a specific project.
The money was therefore left 100 per cent intact in First Bank, in Account No. 2018779464, with a balance of over โฆ2.13 billion.
It is important to stress that funds tied to specific projects or set aside for particular purposes were not even included in the over โฆ75 billion in savings we left behind.
If anybody can establish anything to the contrary, I will stop campaigning. -PO
Mehn, PMS (fuel) prices are atrociously high in Nigeria, and people are aggressively campaigning to keep Tinubu in power come 2027. In saner climes, any government that presides over such high energy prices will lose the federal election.
This is for APC minions who will always retort, "Hold your Governor to account and note the President," when we ask questions about the president's abysmal economic performance
Yes, hold your governor to account but donโt forget that the Federal Government still consumes 52% of our resources. 36 state governors only share 28% and 774 LGAs only share 20%. Even if states were to control all LGA funds, that would still be 48% divided among 36 governors while the Federal Government alone consumes 52%.
Thatโs why the Federal Government can afford to triple the number of agencies it has since the Oronsaye Report from 541 in 2012 to more than 1600 in 2016. That is why the Federal Government can even afford to have fake agencies.
APC will never tell you why they will vote tinubu, they'll always focus on why you should not vote PO!
I am not voting for PO to do any magic in Nigeria. I'm not even asking for 24 hours electricuty or mass industrialization.
This is just what I want
I just want a president
1) who is not a criminal
2) who will obey rule of law
3) who will actually work with data
4) who respects and fears the people
5) who will give free and fair elections
6) who will reduce cost of governance
To be clear, every government in this country's history has initiated economic policies intended for the overall good of the people. Let's say it in clear terms: Tinubu's economic reforms are a mirage. Stop tricking Nigerians with phrases
This government hides under the " economic reform " mantra to deceive Nigerians because its economic policy has not translated to better economic well-being for all Nigerians.
@RoKhanna@BernieSanders Yeah. People dispense great energy thinking about how to spend money they didn't make. The world is very wide open & free for anyone to make money and sponsor whatever damn project they want.
Planning to steal anyone's wealth under the cover of "tax" should be a crime
A Oxford PhD student got flagged for submitting AI-generated work.
His advisor called it the most sophisticated research process he had seen in 20 years.
The student had not used AI to write a single word.
Here is the workflow that got him reported.
He starts every essay with a diagnostic he calls brutal. He dumps his rough argument into Claude and asks one question: what are the three weakest logical jumps in this reasoning, and where would a hostile examiner attack first? The AI does not write his essay. It destroys his draft, and then he rebuilds from whatever survives.
Most students using AI are doing the opposite. They hand Claude a topic and ask it to write. He hands Claude his thinking and asks it to find every place where that thinking falls apart. The difference between those two approaches is the difference between outsourcing your brain and sharpening it.
The second step is the one that made his advisor go quiet. He uploads the five most important papers in his field alongside his draft and asks Claude what claims in his argument contradict or oversimplify what these authors actually found. Most PhD students cite papers they have skimmed once. He cites papers he has been forced to genuinely reckon with, because Claude keeps catching the places where he got them wrong.
The final move is almost unfair. Before he submits anything, he pastes his conclusion and runs one more prompt. He asks what a philosopher of science would say is missing from this argument and what assumptions he is making that he has not defended. His essays come back from reviewers with phrases like unusually rigorous and demonstrates rare critical depth, and his committee has no idea that the depth came from a machine asking him harder questions than any human in his department was willing to ask.
The academic integrity hearing lasted three hours. The panel asked him to rebuild his methodology from scratch in the room. He opened his laptop and showed them exactly how the workflow ran, prompt by prompt. They did not just clear him. They gave him the highest grade in the department's history and asked him to present the process to faculty.
Here is what that story actually means. What took most PhD candidates six months of back-and-forth with advisors, he was compressing into a single session because he had figured out something almost nobody else has. AI does not make your thinking better by replacing it. It makes your thinking better by attacking it faster than any human critic ever would.
He was not using AI to write. He was using it to think harder than he could alone.
The tool is the same one everyone has. The workflow is the part nobody is teaching.