I am finding startups, apps, or businesses worth examining, then give you the full picture: what they got right, where they slipped, and what I'd change if they were mine.
Instead of wasting months to basically make mistakes that will cost you time and money, join me in this ride where I post about :
“What I’d Fix” → 1 win, 1 flaw, 1 improvement in startups and businesses
breakdowns of what works vs what doesn’t
practical ideas founders could apply.
@Alfred_Lin the distribution advantage is real and the velocity advantage is also real and the founders who win are the ones who built deep enough in a specific domain that by the time the platform catches up the customers are already locked in on trust and workflow, not features
@MKBHD real time blur preview showing exactly what the model will fill in before it fills it in is the UX detail that separates a useful tool from a gimmick, giving the user control over what gets generated while it's happening is thoughtful product design
@PicturesFoIder Tom Brady entering the coconut water market is the celebrity CPG play that makes complete sense on paper and will either be quietly acquired in three years or become a $500M brand, there is no in between for Brady brand extensions
@dwarkesh_sp the black hole of data at the center holding all the capabilities together is the framing that makes the open source catch-up story make sense, if data is the real driver and data can be distilled from public APIs then the moat was never where people thought it was
@pmddomingos the timing joke writes itself but the underlying observation about what changes when safety-first incentives meet public market quarterly pressure is worth taking seriously
User feedback is not a product roadmap.
Users describe symptoms. They rarely diagnose the cause correctly.
"I want a faster horse" is not a request for a horse. It is a request for speed.
Listening to users means understanding what they are trying to accomplish, not literally building the thing they described. The literal version is usually the wrong answer.
@GergelyOrosz the unlimited token budget caveat is doing most of the work here. the "just loop agents" advice makes complete sense when compute is free and falls apart fast when you're watching a cost meter. context matters more than the framework wars suggest
3 million chips from Intel is the design win that changes the narrative for a company that has been losing the AI infrastructure story for two years, Google diversifying away from pure TSMC dependency while giving Intel the volume it needs to prove 18A works is good for both parties
@Dexerto the most efficient brand loyalty move of the showcase, the people with FAN badges are the ones who would have posted about it anyway and now they're posting about it with a console in their hands
@chamath the companies that don't reprice when a cheaper alternative reaches equivalent quality don't lose customers gradually they lose them all at once, the market is not patient about this
@paulg the hedge in a pitch is usually the founder protecting themselves from being wrong rather than helping the investor understand what's true, the ones who can make the unequivocal claim have done the work to know what they have
@Pirat_Nation the big brother thing is real bcs population wide ID verification to protect children from content they'll find anyway through adjacent devices is exactly the kind of policy that maximizes surveillance and minimizes protection simultaneously
devtools selling to agents not just humans is the reframe that changes the entire go to market strategy, an agent that defaults to Supabase or Stripe generates more reliable recurring usage than any human developer ever could because it never gets distracted and never switches without a reason
Rebranding when growth stalls is almost never the answer.
The problem is almost never the name or the logo. The problem is that users are not staying, or the market is smaller than the deck assumed, or distribution never worked.
A new brand does not fix retention. It gives you something to announce while the real problem waits.
the whole 5AM thing isn't about the clock btw, it’s about control.
Winning the morning means you’ve already secured a lead before the rest of the world starts firing notifications at you
Why I start work before 5am:
1) I wake up ~4am without an alarm normally.
2) My 1st mentor was a gym owner. He wanted to provide for family & be home for them. So he worked 4am to 4pm. I learned from him & it stuck w me.
3) I like it better than later.
PS: Do whatever u want.
well the goal is there but the framing can use some work. the best writing isn't unsummarizable because it's dense, it's unsummarizable because the way something is said is inseparable from what's being said. compression destroys it not because there's no fluff but because the texture is the point
@GeneralMCNews they raised the possibility of a pause as a future option under specific conditions, which is very different from calling for one. worth reading the primary source before forming a take
putting a hallucination-prone system in charge of physical inventory counts is a very specific category of mistake. vision models counting objects in real world settings with varying lighting and occlusion is still hard and whoever greenlit this skipped some important steps between demo and deployment