We want to know why the mRNA sh0ts a are still being pushed on the citizens of America and the world - Now there is a new study.
There has been another publication about the mRNA vaccine telling us why all the Turbo Cancers are growing due to the vaccines.
Why would anyone trade getting a virus for contracting a very fast growing cancer?
Warning: This Carl Sagan explaination has caused existential crises.
He explains how 5th dimensional beings perceive 3D creatures, and the implications are so disturbing, I paused it three times.
He said:
A being from the 5th dimension could reach into your locked house, take an object off your kitchen table, and place it in orbit around Jupiter without ever crossing a wall, a door, or the vacuum of space.
People ridiculed when Carl Sagan said this.
But, he was walking through the cleanest piece of geometric logic in modern physics, and most people who watched it never realized what he actually gave them.
The demonstration starts small.
Imagine a flat creature living on a sheet of paper. Its entire universe is length and width. It has no concept of "up" because up doesn't exist in its world. The direction is literally unthinkable to its nervous system.
Now take a three-dimensional apple and push it slowly through the paper.
What does the flat creature see?
A dot appears from nowhere. The dot expands into a circle. The circle grows, shrinks, then collapses back into nothing. The apple was always whole. The flatlander only ever perceived cross-sections of something its dimensions could not contain.
That's the entire trick.
Sagan's move was to rotate the analogy upward and let you feel the vertigo yourself.
You are the flatlander. Your body, your brain, your sensory apparatus evolved to process three spatial dimensions and one directional slice of time.
Anything existing in a higher dimension would pass through your world the same way that apple passed through the paper. As fragments, apparitions, sudden appearances, inexplicable disappearances.
A 4D being could see every organ in your body simultaneously from the outside, the way you can see every room of a dollhouse at once from above.
A 5D being could observe your entire lifetime from every version of you from infant to corpse like a single unmoving sculpture stretched across time.
What's interesting is it's a direct consequence of how dimensions mathematically nest inside one another.
Every dimension has full access to the interior of the one below it. A 3D hand can touch any point inside a 2D square without crossing its edges. A 4D hand could touch any point inside your sealed body without breaking your skin.
Sagan has really handed us a quiet reframe of every "impossible" phenomenon humans have reported for thousands of years like visions, presences, objects moving through walls, beings that seem to know your past and future.
Though his Geometry doesn't confirm any of it. But it removes the argument that such things would violate physics.
JUST IN: It’s been revealed the “waste water” used to produce a single 16oz bag of almonds could power someone making 100 ChatGPT queries/day for >385 years.
A quiet transformation has breached the threshold of our daily lives, subtly rewriting the relationship between what we consume and where it comes from.
In the familiar routine of morning drive-thru coffees and comforting summer treats, corporate giants like Starbucks, Nestlé and Breyers have integrated precision-fermented bioengineered alternatives into consumer products.
What was once confined to the hypothetical horizon of science fiction is now actively resting on grocery shelves and brewing in cafés. This shift did not arrive with an open announcement, but rolled out under the radar, nestled deep within complex ingredient disclosures and strategic supply chain partnerships.
The truly unsettling reality lies in how easily the line between the natural world and laboratory synthesis has blurred without the public noticing. Millions of people navigate their days entirely unaware that their morning beverages, frozen desserts, or processed snacks contain proteins cultured in bioreactors rather than sourced from traditional agriculture. By embedding these novel, bioengineered components into household brands, the traditional connection to real, earth-grown food is being fundamentally disrupted. This normalization of lab-grown alternatives bypasses consumer awareness entirely, standardizing engineered nutrition while leaving the average person completely oblivious to what they are actually swallowing.
🚩Labels to Watch Out For
‼️Cell-Cultured / Cell-Cultivated: The primary official terms required by the USDA and FDA for meat grown from animal cells.
‼️Cultured Meat / Cultivated Meat: Common variations used to identify cell-derived proteins.
‼️Cell-Based: A phrase used to describe proteins grown in a laboratory setting rather than harvested from traditionally raised livestock.
🚩Precision Fermentation Labels
For dairy or egg alternatives that contain animal-identical proteins made via engineered microorganisms, watch for allergen warnings. By law under the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA), these products must disclose the animal allergen even if they are animal-free (e.g., "Contains milk allergen" or "Contains egg").
✅Labels That Guarantee Traditional Farming
If you want to ensure your food comes from traditionally raised sources, look for these specific certifications:
➡️100% Grass-Fed / Pasture-Raised: Guarantees livestock had access to outdoor pastures.
➡️USDA Certified Organic: Prohibits synthetic bioengineering processes and ensures traditional agricultural practices.
➡️Hatched, Raised, and Harvested in the USA: Indicates standard domestic farm sourcing for poultry and poultry products.
🚩Labels to Watch Out For
‼️Cell-Cultured / Cell-Cultivated: The primary official terms required by the USDA and FDA for meat grown from animal cells.
‼️Cultured Meat / Cultivated Meat: Common variations used to identify cell-derived proteins.
‼️Cell-Based: A phrase used to describe proteins grown in a laboratory setting rather than harvested from traditionally raised livestock.
🚩Precision Fermentation Labels
For dairy or egg alternatives that contain animal-identical proteins made via engineered microorganisms, watch for allergen warnings. By law under the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA), these products must disclose the animal allergen even if they are animal-free (e.g., "Contains milk allergen" or "Contains egg").
✅Labels That Guarantee Traditional Farming
If you want to ensure your food comes from traditionally raised sources, look for these specific certifications:
➡️100% Grass-Fed / Pasture-Raised: Guarantees livestock had access to outdoor pastures.
➡️USDA Certified Organic: Prohibits synthetic bioengineering processes and ensures traditional agricultural practices.
➡️Hatched, Raised, and Harvested in the USA: Indicates standard domestic farm sourcing for poultry and poultry products.
📉 Economic & Social Impacts
🚩Prohibitive Production Costs: Growth media, specialized bioreactors, and clean-room facilities remain extremely expensive, threatening to keep these items limited to niche markets.
🚩Agricultural Disruption: Rapid displacement of traditional dairy or livestock production could devastate rural communities, leading to job losses for millions of farmers and ranchers.
🚩Corporate Monopolization: High capital requirements mean large multinational meat and chemical conglomerates are likely to acquire smaller startups, centralizing control over the food supply.
🚩Infrastructure Scaling Bottlenecks: Moving from "pharma-scale" to "food-scale" requires an unprecedented volume of bioreactor capacity that does not currently exist globally.
🛑 Environmental Impacts
🚩Massive Carbon Footprint: Current Near-term production methods for cultivated meat can have a global warming potential 4 to 25 times higher than farmed beef.
🚩Energy-Intensive Purification: Cultivating cells requires pharmaceutical-grade growth media and intensive purification to eliminate endotoxins, which demands immense fossil fuel energy.
🚩Dirty Energy Reliance: If the factories scaling up these foods rely on standard electrical grids rather than 100% renewable energy, their long-term climate impact could worsen compared to conventional agriculture.
🚩Feedstock Land Requirements: Precision fermentation and cell cultivation require sugar and nutrient feedstocks (like dextrose from corn or soy), which could maintain or expand intensive monoculture farming.
⚠️ Health & Safety Risks
🚩Contamination Vulnerability: Because bioreactors are rich in nutrients, any breach in sterility can lead to the rapid growth of bacterial pathogens, viruses, or mycoplasma.
🚩Unknown Long-Term Effects: While declared safe by early regulatory bodies (like the FDA), there is a lack of multi-generational human studies regarding the long-term metabolic impacts of consuming entirely novel, highly processed cell-based matrices.
🚩Allergenicity Issues: Precision fermentation produces proteins identical to milk or egg allergens. Clear labeling will be critical to prevent severe allergic reactions in consumers who assume "animal-free" means safe for them.
🚩Nutritional Completeness: Replicating a structured steak or complex whole food means missing out on the intricate micronutrient profile, trace minerals, and natural fat distributions found in traditionally raised whole foods.
🎩Thefarmacyreal✨
BREAKING 🚨: Hubble has revealed a giant 10-sided decagon sits at Saturn’s South Pole
We now can confirm Saturn has a hexagon at one pole and a decagon at the other 🪐
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Sauerkraut Juice Just
Did What Billion-Dollar Herbicides Couldn’t! 🚨
An Iowa researcher and a Wisconsin cabbage disaster led to this: raw sauerkraut brine, applied at about 15 gallons per acre, cut residual glyphosate and AMPA in contaminated soil by roughly 80-87% in 5-6 months.
The next corn crop on those strips yielded
about 11-13 extra bushels per acre.
It started with soggy “organic” sauerkraut.
The cabbage had been fertilized with poultry manure from birds fed glyphosate-treated grain.
The chemical bound minerals
the plants needed for strong cell walls.
The leftover fermentation juice loaded with Lactobacillus then turned out to be a surprisingly effective soil cleanup.
One kitchen byproduct.
One peer-reviewed field result.
A lot of questions the industry
would rather you don’t ask.
What else is locked in your soil
that a $4 jar of brine might unlock?
If “organic” cabbage can still get hit by manure from conventional feed, how clean is clean?]
Why are we still treating the symptom with more spray instead of testing cheap microbial waste streams at scale?
If this works even halfway as advertised, who loses money when farmers stop buying the next jug?
And the one that should keep you up: how much of what we eat is grown in dirt that never actually reset?
Read the “Saga of Soggy Sauerkraut” paper.
Then tell me why this isn’t
on every farm radio station.
Let me Know
What You Think,
and SHARE THIS
So that Others
may Too!
And If
You're Not
Already
Following
@TrueOnX...
What the Heck
Are You Doing?!
You have opinions. But I have data.
The average number of heatwaves per year per station (area-weighted) in the U.S. have decreased by 27.9% since the start of the 20th century. The only way one can get a slight increase is by starting the analysis in 1960 or 1970.
My findings have bee confirmed in both the Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA4, Chapter 6) and more recently in Christy (2026), a research paper recently published in the Journal of Theoretical and Applied Climatology.
🔗 https://t.co/h8un7urlt4
🔗 https://t.co/DSJXxVVKZa
What’s more, the number of daily record high maximum temperatures (Tmax) set have not increased since 1895. The ratio of record highs to lows, however, has increased, but that’s only because record low minimum temperatures (Tmin) have decreased at a faster rate than highs.
The only thing I am ignoring here is your arrogance. You are awfully confident in your abilities, but still rest comfortably at the peak of Mount Stupid.
American doctors says “I am fed the absolute f*ck up — I'm a doctor, I can order labs for my patients” and she’s furious over a partner of LabCorp
This company abuses animals to the point she’ll never forget what she’s seen. “I've used a company called LabCorp, and today I called them. Why? Well, because I learned recently that LabCorp gets its supply of animals used for testing from a little f*ck-a** company called Marshall BioResources.
Why am I so pissed about this? Oh, well, I'll spare you what I have learned about Marshall BioResources. But to put it lightly, they torture animals. You'd think that they have to abide by these animal welfare laws. Lies — I don't even think they fucking exist at this point.
The things that I have seen and read about what goes on within the walls of this facility, they've done things to my brain that I can never undo. Do you understand? It is that bad. And I am so f*cking tired of people thinking that they can do whatever however to animals”
She’s goes into more details about what’s going on
I’ve done my own research and it’s bad
Marshall BioResources is one of the largest commercial breeders of purpose-bred animals for labs in the United States
- USDA and APHIS has cited Marshall more than 20 times under the Animal Welfare Act
- They’ve had animals seized for conditions
- Recently in the last couple months former federal prosecutor Bonnie Klapper submitted a criminal referral to the Wayne County, NY DA alleging felony-level cruelty
- They euthanize animals and one way they did it to a dog was by stomping the dogs neck
(Yes it’s that bad, but it gets worse)
Whistleblower photos and accounts from reputable organizations describe mesh cages over feces-covered floors, cages cleaned only every two weeks, moldy feeders, puppies dead in enclosures, “non-standard” puppies killed for things like wrong eye color, kinked tail, rough handling causing jaw injuries and alleged “panic cleans” before inspections
Despite the solemn headline, it’s important to note that this doesn’t mean it’s time for us to wring our hands in defeat and just give up. What it does mean is that we’re going to have to push ten times harder against the powers that be if we want a fighting chance for our world.
The United Nations worst case global warming scenario collapsed a few months ago after admissions the modellers got it wrong.
The world is no longer facing a 5.5°C warming trajectory by 2100 at all. That target has been removed as 'implausible'. Yet this was the chief driving reason for a global transition away from fossil fuels, and replacing them with energy from wind turbines and solar panels.
This effort to harness wind and sunlight could become one of the greatest economic disasters in modern history, costing $275 trillion by the time a new fully developed infrastructure is in place by 2050. This would include a second global power grid costing $21 trillion.
The UN explanation—'We are on track for a 5°C apocalypse if we don't immediately upend the global economy'—is dead.
Removing its extreme scenario creates a distinct institutional challenge for a climate bureaucracy that spent 25 years leveraging fear. We are left with a blighted rural landscape, trillions of dollars spent on a gigantic physical overbuild and the likelihood that this will become a self-fulfilling, replacement loop every 20 to 30 years.
The scientific community has acknowledged that the catastrophic, upper-end predictions were built on flawed, outdated economic models, because early modelers failed to understand real-world market trends.
First made available in 2011 to drive global climate policy, this extreme scenario—known widely as RCP8.5 (and later SSP5-8.5)—served as the primary engine for the media's terrifying 'business-as-usual' headlines for over a decade.
It was built on assumptions that humanity would aggressively abandon clean tech, undergo an unprecedented five-fold increase in coal use, and even resort to converting coal to oil to run vehicles. Those apocalyptic projections simply didn't occur and fossil fuels produce 81% of global primary energy; wind-solar 6.5%.
With the retirement of the extreme 5C baseline for the upcoming 7th Assessment Report (AR7), the ceiling for projected global warming has dropped significantly. The newly proposed high-emissions baseline has been downgraded to a maximum of 3.3°C by 2100.
The climate narrative has now officially shifted from an existential struggle of 'apocalypse versus survival' to a standard problem of risk management.
Developed in the early 2010s, RCP8.5 was intended to reflect its worst-case scenario available at the time, according to an analysis by Carbon Brief. It modeled a future with rapid population growth and massive, unchecked coal expansion where global coal use would increase multifold by 2100.
Media outlets, advocacy groups, and financial regulators defaulted to RCP8.5, creating a vision of unchecked coal expansion. Yet while real-world coal production did rise—driven by China and India to roughly 9 billion tons annually—it never approached the absurd 5x multiplier required by the UN’s old models.
Most people get rich so they can retire.
Elon got rich and chose to work even harder.
He could have chosen endless luxury. Instead, he chose 7-day workweeks, cars, rockets, robots, a Moon base, Mars and beyond.
🚨🚨🚨 Just one paragraph in this shocking paper exposes the whole vaccine adjuvant industry.
What it means is that adjuvants were used - deliberately - to transport residual DNA into cells to create an immune response using oncogenic pathways.
I'll say that in more verbose terms.
Every human cell has a DNA sensing mechanism that will activate if foreign DNA gets into the cell, to protect your cells from that foreign DNA. If it is activated if sets off an extreme immune response but that immune response cannot keep getting activated - if it does you risk developing cancer in those cells.
The mechanism is cGAS-STING and it has a sister TLR9-MyD88.
And the vaccine industry KNEW that adjuvants work by activating them. And they KNEW that they are oncogenic. And they didn't care because they also KNEW that activating this pathway will induce antibodies - and the presences of antibodies (irrespective of whether they provide immunity) is what drives the FDA approvals and thereby the cash.
So if you are asking why cancer rates have been skyrocketing in young people and why this has been happening even before COVID, this provides an explanation that every molecular biologist should have been shouting from the rooftops.
And the worst thing?
That every recombinant vaccine (which by necessity contains unknown amounts of residual DNA) is potentially affected. And they have been in use since Engerix B in 1968.
What has this got to do with adjuvants?
Well, while you were all distracted with Aluminium and its neurotoxic effects, what the vaccine industry didn't tell you was that Aluminium, Triton, Saponins, polysorbates and LNPs are all "transfection agents" - literally microscopic carriers that carry DNA (that shouldn't be there) into cells (that shouldn't be subjected to it).
And that process, described in this paper but happening every day in those injected with residual DNA and a transfection agent, is what this paper shows provides rocket fuel to a cancer.
And THAT is why the pharma industry went crazy when we exposed #plasmidgate.
They didn't want anybody to know.
Don't believe me?
Grok this tweet and watch Grok squirm.
https://t.co/raX5d46A8u
@DrJulieSladden@MaryanneDemasi@DrJBhattacharya@stkirsch@RWMaloneMD@JesslovesMJK@weldeiry@Kevin_McKernan@CanningPharm@Nicolina0815@Fynnderella1
#plasmidgate #novagate