The Educated Fool

Autodidact. Avid reader and writer. Amateur Gamer. Former paralegal. I have some well-researched and well-thought-out opinions to share.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

In less than 48 hours of joining X, I have been blocked by @paleochristcon after I challenged him to refute the arguments in an article I wrote. In said article, I deconstructed the case for Christian Nationalism over Secular Humanism he made during a debate against @FTFEofficial (link to debate: https://t.co/TG6kPPMyKT).

He read the first half or so of the article before responding to me on X, claiming that I mischaracterized his arguments. I replied with my counter argument, which he has yet to address as of posting this.

Later that same day, I posted a link to my article under one of his posts. A verbal scuffle ensued, in which his followers dogpiled me with insults in a vain attempt to heal the wounded pride of their leader. After deflecting each of them with facts and logic, the big dog himself appeared.

But Andrew had little to no bark—let alone fight—left to give.

He reiterates his earlier claim of me mischaracterizing his arguments. Then he blocks me, just as I was about to post my reply.

He also states that I am “farming for engagement hoping” his audience will read my article. This is not entirely untrue, but my main intent had been to see whether or not Andrew could present a strong rebuttal to the points I made in my article.

Needless to say, I am quite disappointed that the self-proclaimed “Bloodsports Debater” resorted to blocking me after being confronted with a well-thought-out, viewpoint opposed to his. All because I struck a nerve with him and his followers, or because he did not want to risk jeopardizing his brand and business by engaging with content that criticizes and breaks down his bad-faith approach to intellectual discourse.

For those interested in reading my article, here is the link to it: https://t.co/KPnuVhZs90

Dismantling the arguments made by charlatans, who have a slightly above average IQ at best, is not my proudest accomplishment. Nevertheless, I felt compelled to do so, given the concerning number of ill-informed people on the Internet who are unable to recognize and see through the bad faith debate tactics of pseudo intellectual showmen like Andrew.

I hope this interaction is as educational and entertaining for you as it was for me.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AztecCrewElder @Tree_of_Logic @Rach4Patriarchy She had kids with three different men… Imagine how many dudes she had casual sex with.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@HockleyTyson @Cobratate Receipts?

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@DrewPavlou @nickschadegg I respect the level of self awareness in this rage bait post.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@DrewPavlou

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AK_in_my_pocket @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AK_in_my_pocket @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AK_in_my_pocket @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj Keep complaining buddy.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@churchs_sermons @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj I like how calling for pedophiles to be brought to justice triggers people like you.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AK_in_my_pocket @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj The irony is you are the one who tried insulting me first by saying I live Canada.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@churchs_sermons @JCWelshgirl @paleochristcon @BelieveIt91 @jakeshieldsajj I ask you to describe the evidence, and you post a list of law codes and cases you’ve never read?

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@JCWelshgirl @paleochristcon @BelieveIt91 @jakeshieldsajj You failed to answer my question. I’ll give you one last chance to answer.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@AK_in_my_pocket @MakerWidow23528 @paleochristcon @jakeshieldsajj You’re from Detroit 😂.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@churchs_sermons @JCWelshgirl @paleochristcon @BelieveIt91 @jakeshieldsajj Which is?

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@JCWelshgirl @paleochristcon @BelieveIt91 @jakeshieldsajj If cross referencing victim testimonials with the perpetuators’ past actions and behaviour isn’t enough, then you are going to have to propose a new type of evidence yourself. I’ll wait.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@JCWelshgirl @paleochristcon @BelieveIt91 @jakeshieldsajj What evidence exactly is sufficient in your eyes to confirm a child was sexually assaulted?

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@RELENTLESSRG @Sola_Requiem @paleochristcon

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

Nope, according to the data, most of his debate opponents have been 88.3% OF models on the whatever podcast. And mind you, we know ran-through Rachel has three men who she got impregnated by. It is therefore safe to assume the number of men she had casual sex with is much, much higher.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@Dusty4570 @Sola_Requiem @paleochristcon Then he should stop asking potential debate opponents to pay him $1k+ for a debate. Simple.

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@drnibble @Sola_Requiem @paleochristcon Check my profile. He blocked me cause of the risk I posed to his brand as an 'unbeatable bloodsports debater.'

[The Educated Fool @EducatedFool47]

@Dusty4570 @Sola_Requiem @paleochristcon If you’re telling the truth, let’s see him stop ducking Pisco and ProfessorDave. You know, actual professionals in the real world with degrees and experience in their respective fields.