@Alan_G_Shaw@CourageHabit@SamCKx There are apps, options and programs that all are actually effective. And if you say "But kids can bypass" you'll realize also why the ID is a bad idea due to how easy it is to bypass.
If this eas about kids you'd push for phones and Sim cards for kids. Curiously no one does.
@LewisLFC2026@SamCKx Also ignore implementing actual solutions or push the already existing solutions.
If you actually cared about kids, the focus would be to push for phones and Sim cards for kids that would put a limitation that is extremely more difficult to bypass compared to the ID.
@LewisLFC2026@SamCKx It's not an effective way of actually dealing with the problem and instead screws everyone over for a problem that has both been overstated (studies have not found strong enough correlation).
It really doesn't help your case when you both want parents to not do their job and
I’m actually a child online safety expert and was one of the pioneers in this space with Club Penguin and so I feel uniquely positioned to critique this.
The groomer problem is real but it’s also vastly overstated. The far larger issue we saw at Penguin was suicidality or reports of sexual abuse in the home.
There is no solution for lazy/bad parenting. You can implement all the ID laws you want but if parents are going to just hand kids their phones unlocked, those kids will have access to all the same things the parents have unfettered.
What I found is that these draconian safety laws actually make it harder to be an honest operator of kids apps because on one hand it’s so much legal risk and so much user friction that it simply becomes uninvestible as a business.
Parents will just lie to let their kids use the unfettered internet. For example, I have a friend who works in mobile gaming who has two kids, one above and one below the age limit but separated by just 2 yrs, and the two wanted to play and chat together on Roblox - which is reasonable. To do this, he just verified that his younger kid is old enough for the chat feature when he’s not.
This happens all the time and will happen with these laws to. How far do we want to go with this? Scan the face of the user in real-time to make sure it’s not a kid using the device? We could do that but it feels like a massive unwanted intrusion of privacy.
That’s how you know this law isn’t about kids. COPPA and GDPR-K and so forth already make it illegal to allow chat and other grooming vectors to kids.
What’s really being done here is trying to eliminate online anonymity. And this is a far bigger issue that goes to core speech rights because if you cannot criticize the govt anonymously and if wrong speech is a crime then it becomes easy to identify all the detractors of the govt in power, and ban, fine or jail them for speech crimes.
Starmer has already been doing this and he wants to do it at a much bigger scale. Starmer won’t even acknowledge the problem of actual grooming gangs in Britain’s neighborhoods but he’s worried about online grooming?
No he’s not, and this hypocrisy gives away the game. What he wants is to kill online anonymity so he can enforce censorship of his unpopular policies. No politician should have this power.
@ChibiReviews It wasn't "just poster and billboards", it was used in cutscenes and animations. Check the police car to the left here, and the first heist animation.
It's blatantly AI without even trying to touch it up and change it to actually fix any errors.
@mxstersp1nter Report them buddy.
I know you won't, because as I've already established you are just a coward that's trying to find some meaning in your boringass life and don't even actually believe the shit you say.
@mxstersp1nter Now you're just trying to get a last word in while still compulsively talking about cuckolding, your ass is projecting harder than an open air cinema.
Still haven't defended shit, I've been calling your candy asses out for being LARPers that ain't doing shit.
@mxstersp1nter "Typing essays" the cuckold that has posted about cuckolding in several posts in the last hour says to me, on Twitter. Bot lacking in wit and illiterate. A double whammy of a lonely guy with no purpose in his ass life LMFAO
@mxstersp1nter Literally repeating what I just said... You ain't got no wit at all, do you boyo? Need me to explain why it ain't mattering shit what you say when you've already proven you're too much of a cuck to even do anything?
All you do is jump up and down like circus clowns.
@mxstersp1nter LMAO sure you will, you're all clapping like seals and talking shit but never once do anything despite believing it to be pedophilia. You're just peeps so lacking in any actual meaning in your life that the only shit that got you feeling anything is acting tough online.
Pathetic
@mxstersp1nter Defending? Told you to your face you're too pussy to do shit. All of you are, talking smack and acting like fiction is real crimes yet lack the cajones to even do anything. That ain't defending, that's me calling your ass out
Buncha LARPers that don't even believe your own words
@mxstersp1nter Well yeah, because y'all too pussy to actually do shit despite all the smack talk about the guy you're compulsively obsessed posting about.
@Scoom219572@ChibiReviews By being so compulsively obsessed with a guy online that you want to dig up a corpse? How low y'alls self-esteem that you are this way and at the same time so lacking in balls that you won't even do it out of fear.
We are GIVING AWAY a WOOLHAVEN PC with the help of @AftershockpcAU
To celebrate the release of our first expansion! ❄️
❤️ Like 🔄Retweet 👤Be following us for a chance to win!
@borgirqing @AnniePants02_ Nothing wrong with being weird.
What I find strange is more the fact that people on social media get so upset over vtubers. Not you specifically but it's like
Peeps doing nothing in their own corner and people just seethe at that.
@frogs4girls I mean, it is nonpolitical to them. That you choose to view it as political through the theories of critical theory doesn't mean it's some factual statement, though that goes both ways.