@ScottAdamsSays WUT? Maybe because Iran’s rulers are and have been publicly dedicated to the destruction of another, non-contiguous nation with whom they have no historical grievance. And Israel is not. Who needs analogies when the facts are undisputable?
@KennethRWebster@LoganRoykah It’s not obvious they “didn’t consider” it. By and large the Hormuz chokepoint has been handled with minimal market disruption. Long-term, Hormuz becomes a non-factor as oil is routed overland. This will be a great benefit to the world.
RRs governing coalition was a close-run thing. Seems he chose not to expend political capital on fighting the Mullahs.
DJT’s been stalwart on Iran since the 1980s & willingly put his power at risk by acting on a long-time bipartisan consensus. All agreed action was needed; Trump acted.
@KennethRWebster It ends like wars historically do, when the defeated party accepts reality and seeks terms. Iran is a special case; Mullahs have zero organic support in Iran & have only survived thru murderous tyranny. We’ll find these would-be Islamic “martyrs” to be very few & far between.
@provaxtexan@imthatgalag Probably so he could get back to doing his job. And possibly because he knew the Legislature would award them diddly for their phony story.
@HeyHokie@imthatgalag Hey, great research nimrod. Straight from his political enemies. Now why would a disinterested observer find that unconvincing?
I asked you to state plainly exactly what the impeachment wrongdoing was. You just regurgitated the slop.
Ya know, it’s not too late to get that GED.
@pepsicococacola You’re right. Not remotely true. 100% true.
His detractors would be circulating videos of all the damning evidence presented, if there were any. Have you got any? Of course not.
@walterkirn It’s amazing how much privacy we’ve surrendered for infinitesimally smaller bits of convenience, like not having to read a map or enter a credit card number.
@rjrusak Sorry tubby, this shallow bit of “journalism” will never be tested. You should know better than to believe the polls & the astroturfing. But maybe you’re getting paid for the advocacy.
@UnimpressedTX@Principles1stTX@imthatgalag@grok Well, we all got to see, live on tv, the prosecution’s best case against Paxton. And it would not have convinced any sane person. There was no underlying wrongdoing demonstrated. It was lawfare and it failed.
@UnimpressedTX@imthatgalag It’s clear the “whistleblowers” accused him of crimes with no knowledge or evidence he’d committed any crime. They deserved to be fired at the least. If the firing breaks a law that law is screwed up. Thats why the legislature refused to approve the award.