Todd

[Todd @ElGanch0]

@SaltyGoat17 As a Californian, absolutely YES!!!!!, please. And thank you!

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Finally getting over the asthma - and here's the org chart of the Newark protests, as promised. A few are missing, particularly the Catholic NGOs. But this is the basic template for how mass protests are coordinated so quickly.

[GunShyMartyr @jimmy_rustlin]

The same narrative can be found on the main amplifier of the Delaney Hall movement - Defiance Dispatch. Led by Jiggy Geronimo or Dr Jegath A. Former neuroscientist turned political messaging guru and campaign strategist.

[Spencer Pratt @spencerpratt]

When I was in my 20’s I was on a TV show. When Karen Bass was in her 20’s, she was training in terrorist tactics and guerrilla warfare with communists in Cuba. Back when the LA Times was still in LA, and used to tell the truth…

[Rich Baris THE PEOPLE'S PUNDIT @Peoples_Pundit]

💪💪💪

[John Ʌ Konrad V @johnkonrad]

John Thune has become a punching bag for good reason but there is a more insidious force at play nobody can talk about. Let me explain…

The staffers in Thune’s office have been asking Trump Naval and Maritime appointees questions about me before confirmation hearings.

I doubt John Thune knows who I am. His staff absolutely does. They track me. They hate me. And they will quietly bleed pushing out any appointee I’m friends with.

Someone close to PPO told me a Trump staffer commented that “Konrad should be a HBS case study on someone every in the administration respects but has zero chance of any appointment.”

It’s probably because I’ve called out congressional staffers numerous times before.

This is how Congress actually works.

It’s always the staffers. When we first floated the SHIPS Act, Mike Johnson’s hometown delegation were strong supporters.

The minute he became Speaker, his hometown people got bulldozed by the Speaker of the House staff he inherited.

Same man, different staff, different priorities.

Why do you think they wanted Mitch McConnell propped up after the freezing episodes? It wasn’t McConnell.

It was the cartel of people on his staff who needed his chair filled by someone they already controlled.

Members can’t read their own bills anymore. Thirty years of capped staff, frozen pay, and brain drain to K Street has left rank and file senators functionally illiterate on the legislation they vote on.

Leadership staff fill the vacuum. They are not entrenched because they are corrupt. They are entrenched because nobody else in the building can move a 1,500-page must-pass bill through conference.

That is the cartel. And it has rules. If you want anything in the NDAA, the omnibus, the CR, or any vehicle that actually moves, you do not piss them off. You do not name them. Break either rule and you do not get a second omnibus.

I’m not even willing to name individual staff.

John Phelan is the case study nobody is reading correctly. Phelan was not fired because he was a bad secretary. Phelan was fired because his chief of staff Jon Harrison had deep knowledge of the pentagon that Phelan lacked. Without him, Phelan was walking around the Pentagon naked and he knew it. He pulled back from media events and became too cautious.

Then there is Susie Wiles. I don’t know her. Never met her. From everything I can piece together she is doing a great job. The point is not Susie. The point is the Vanity Fair article.

It’s not even the article itself, that article contained a lot of BS, it was the reaction that came after. Every single republican & a few democrats stood behind her.

Now contrast that with the flood of negative articles about Mike Waltz, Kristi Noem or Pam Bondi.

When a politician is the subject of a hut piece is dragged over the coals, the system shrugs. But when it’s a senior staffer, the system closes rank. It is safer to trash Trump in print than to be perceived as trashing Susie. Trump is used to it. Susie controls the schedule, the access, and the door.

Multiply Susie by every leadership chief of staff, every NDAA conference staffer, & you have the machine. It is not partisan. Schumer’s staff & Thune’s staff protect each other from outside critics more reliably than they protect their own bosses from each other.

Leaders come and go but leadership staff is entrenched.

Congress is broken because leadership staff on both sides want it to remain broken. A Congress that can only legislate through 2,000-page must-pass bill is a Congress where the staff who draft the bill run the country. Regular order is their extinction event. They will never let it come back voluntarily.

You can call out politicians all day. They are used to it. Call out the staff and you don’t get frozen out of one bill. You get frozen out of every bill, by every office, on both sides, for as long as the cartel decides to remember your name.

They remember mine. Now you know why.​​​​​​​​​​​​​ even Luna can’t vall them out.

[Eric Schwalm @Schwalm5132]

Take the time to truly digest this thread and the associated implications that go along with it. You need to see the depth and breadth of how much planning has gone into the overthrow of America from within. Look at these people and ask yourself, "Do I really want them to control my future?"

In the near future I will be taking a Special Forces look at IMIP from an insurgency/color revolution perspective. These are the type of organizations that need to confronted head on, and their members brought into the sunlight for all to see. This isn't politics as usual; this is an all-out assault on every American's ability to govern themselves.

[Todd @ElGanch0]

https://t.co/WhMU1ns3xl

[James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII]

BREAKING: CALIFORNIA MASS IN-PERSON ELECTION FRAUD CRIMES CAUGHT ON CAMERA:

Recordings Show Homeless Are Paid By Petitioners To FORGE Real Voters’ Signatures To Sign Ballot Petitions On Skid Row, Thousands of Times

Disenfranchised Voters Say They Are OUTRAGED After Being Shown Their Signatures Are Forged

Undercover in Los Angeles, James O’Keefe uncovered an election fraud pyramid scheme operating on Skid Row.

In Part II of Cash for Ballots, series hidden camera footage shows petition circulators paying homeless individuals $2–$3 per form to sign ballot petitions using the names and addresses of real registered voters and forging their signatures. Circulators provided printed lists of voters, assigned identities, and directed the homeless individuals exactly what to write, monitoring them to ensure the information matched so the circulators get paid.

“You only write what I tell you to write.”

“Your name’s Robert.”

“If you mess up, I can’t get paid.”

The conduct captured appears to violate multiple California felony statutes, including Elections Code §18613 (signing another person’s name to a petition), Penal Code §470 (forgery), Elections Code §18601–18602 (paying for petition signatures), and Penal Code §470 (forging signatures).

The OMG team and Cam Higby visited addresses tied to the voters' names being used. One resident said the named voter had not lived at the address for nearly a decade, yet election mail was still being delivered.

“Doesn’t live here, uh I bought this house nearly 9 years ago. The only reason I know that name, is because we still get her mail.”

“i always feel really weird when I get the voting ballot. Cause like, you know, obviously that’s fraudulent.”

This is Part II of an ongoing investigation. The Citizen Justice League will continue to release more footage of these crimes caught on tape.

@camhigby @ctznjusticelg

[Based Jessica @RealJessica]

This is why the US Senate doesn't have time to focus on the SAVE Act to secure elections for US Citizens and Voter ID.

They had a Dog Parade today. Sen. Thom Tillis’ final dog parade featuring the dogs of Congress plus @BabydogJustice and owner @JimJustice_WV

They are useless.

[Hon. Vickie Paladino @VickieforNYC]

This is a DSA official literally threatening to execute people after a revolution.

Basically one degree of separation from the DSA mayor of New York City, who never condemns his fellow DSA members no matter what they say or do.

Better not have any ‘islamophobic’ tweets though!

[Cam Higby 🇺🇸 @camhigby]

Red. Fucking. Handed.

[Todd @ElGanch0]

@MonitoringBias @BillboardChris Right!!! Thank you! What a bunch of insufferable idiots.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

👀

[Todd @ElGanch0]

@LindseyGrahamSC @realDonaldTrump Pure theatrics.

[Cam Higby 🇺🇸 @camhigby]

🚨💬 INSURRECTIONISTS ADMIT TO EVERYTHING:

They want their people to die to create propaganda.

In this document distributed on Signal, Minnesota activists lay out that their goal is to impede ICE and CREATE “flashpoints”

They describe “flashpoints” as moments of chaos where they can de-arrest, save illegal immigrants or possibly resulting in the “murder” of a comrade.

They make expressly clear that they WANT flashpoints to occur. This message is specifically designed to be distributed to their dispatchers.

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

BREAKING: James O'Keefe Reveals The Federal Government Is Funding Left-Wing Terrorism Across The Country, Announces Full Report Dropping TODAY:

"I have a video out in two hours of them admitting where they're getting the money. Some of the money comes from the government. The government is funding it. They admit what organizations they are with. These people are willing to die for their cause."

Expose it all @JamesOKeefeIII

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Spreadsheet has been updated with 5,000 additional donations.

This should be obvious, but here goes: the hedging language is there for a reason.

The interesting rows are the ones where the primary_role (Column E) is not blank. I populated only the ones that could be plausibly traced back to a politician or activist.

[Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger]

Most of the debate since yesterday has focused, understandably, on whether the ICE agent acted in what he perceived to be self-defense. Whatever the case, it’s clear that, by encouraging people to interfere in law enforcement operations, the Left is getting people killed.

[Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 @DrewPavlou]

Progressive magazine The Nation just published an extremely disturbing article arguing against the imprisonment of rapists.

The writer was brutally gang raped by a pack of men for 6 hours but refused to repot the crime to police because she believes in the abolition of all police and prisons.

The writer barely stops to consider how her decision to keep these men on the street endangers other women and the rest of society.

“The simple answer to the question of why I never reported the rape is that I believe in the abolition of police and prisons. The less simple, less articulate answer is that to pursue prosecuting and potentially incarcerating other people is inconceivable to me, even when they have hurt me more than I could have ever believed possible. Because of this, I can only vocalize what I want in negative and inherently impossible terms: that all I want is for it to never have happened. The prospect of being a participant in other peoples’ incarceration is as alien to me as anything could be, to the point that I can only conceive of it in childish terms—how silly and strange it would be to have a group of people incarcerated at my expense when doing so would do nothing to fix the damage they have already so thoroughly done.

There’s a lot wrapped up in this feeling that is hard to explain or justify. My empathy for these men is perverse, its recipients undeserving. Maybe it simply stems from the fact that (as I’ve been told) I’ve always been too nice, too apologetic, which is a characteristic itself I feel tired of apologizing for.

But I don’t want to ruin the lives of my rapists and I don’t know if they have children. The only thing I want is for them to never have done what they did to me—and nothing, including sending them to prison, will ever change that reality.

Outside of abolitionist frameworks, the suffering and pain caused by rape and other violent crimes become fodder for mass incarceration. When grief is so easily transformed into the justification for carceral (and genocidal) aims, it can feel as if publicly grieving for rape is an irresponsible or outright dangerous thing to do.”

Rarely have I encountered such a perfect example of suicidal empathy.

I feel sorry for the author because they are clearly mentally disturbed but the reality is that this ideological position is extremely selfish and puts so many innocent people at risk.