I find it absolutely incomprehensible that on the day we foiled a terror plot to attack an RAF base in Britain we are still letting undocumented illegal immigrants cross the English Channel.
Fighting-age men are landing here and disappearing into the ether.
We don’t know who they are, where they’re from, or what they’re going to do here.
It’s a national emergency. But Burnham refuses to act.
https://t.co/7YltBTR9gC
The scenes in Gosport and along the south coast last night were chilling.
French and British authorities appeared to be coordinating the planned movement of illegal migrants to the UK.
This country is being invaded, with our own government actively working against the will of the British people to facilitate it.
Credit to the people of Gosport for their peaceful show of strength and for standing up against a clandestine, underhand operation.
Britain is the first country in history to deem invading men worthy of leaflets teaching them that raping children is wrong…
…and a taxpayer funded motorcade.
Shocking footage
The State is so terrified of the unpopularity of its policies
It mobilises colossal police resources to help illegals invade our nation
While police waste time monitoring tweets
Piers Morgan has just been caught being a hypocrite again. 😩
After making a fuss about Charles Spencer making a minor date error, it turns out that in his own book, Piers describes in great detail having tea with Tony and Cherie Blair at No. 10 Downing Street in March 1997.
Only problem is, Tony Blair didn’t become Prime Minister until 2 May 1997. So Piers couldn’t have been having tea with Blair at No. 10 as he claimed. Seems Piers makes errors with dates too. Awkward. 🤭
WTF? Get robbed. Get raped. Get burgled. And you’re told there aren’t enough police resources to investigate.
When my own kids were robbed at knifepoint by a masked gang, I was told exactly that.
I had to risk my life and investigate it myself.
So I’m beyond fuming to see that these are the resources allocated to moving around illegal migrant coaches.
What the hell is going on? Who exactly is the system protecting? Because it sure as hell isn’t us.
BREAKING NEWS:
Earl Spencer has apologised to me for his defamatory lies published in his new book, Swan Song, published today.
But I am pursuing legal action against him and his publisher Penguin to have the lies removed, and damages paid to the King’s Trust.
William Windsor takes a helicopter 40 miles to chide others on climate change. Two days later he announces he is giving back pennies to a community his duchy took 4.5 million from.
The press herald him as a hero.
Meghan Sussex joins a WhatsApp group for her son’s class. Another parent leaks it.
The press openly attack her.
If you can’t see what is happening right in front of your face - I’m not sure what to say.
WTF are we doing here?
On 9/11, the Archbishop of Canterbury gives an award to the chairman of the Pakistan Ulema Council, the same organisation that honoured Osama bin Laden, the man responsible for 9/11, in retaliation for Britain knighting Salman Rushdie.
On 9/11.
And frankly, if his wife can’t be bothered to show her face, she shouldn’t be at the ceremony.
This suicidal abandonment of our beliefs, culture and values has to stop.
King Charles inherited £650m tax free, gets £354m a year tax free from the tax payer including £132m personal spending money and has an estate worth £22bn that’s never taxed.
Like if he needs a pay cut.
RT if you want the Monarchy gone.
#NotmyKing
Prince William has warned that ‘inch-by-inch' action is not enough to stop climate change. But hey, his regular private helicopter 🚁 trips are absolutely fine.
Angela Rayner is saying Reform must "follow the rules" regarding these record donations.
She is not arguing that we have broken any rules.
She is arguing that we *will* have broken rules her party intends to create and apply retroactively to confiscate donations that were lawful when received.
This is unprecedented.
Literally changing the rules after the fact to punish a political opponent.
How can anyone operate on these terms?
It would be fatal to the very concept of the rule of law.
If Burnham does this, he will be responsible for collapsing the legitimacy of democratic government in Britain.