Em

[Em @Em12752]

@Lissx4x It is both unbelievable & horrifying to me that people think & behave that way. Having an argument & insulting people is more important to them than healthy discussion. I mean, give me information, let’s talk, help me to find my way to your beliefs!

[Em @Em12752]

@QueenAgedChick @Lissx4x @borntoraisehogs @DiligentDenizen I didn’t say “forensically”. You are clearly not a mature adult who can participate in healthy debate. Got it.

[Em @Em12752]

@NMares79609 @realhonestash I wondered when Kolvet allegedly said “it was supposed to be you” did he mean to run TPUSA?

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen I do get what you’re saying. But if you look at everything with an open mind you may just discover that some of what people are saying makes some sense. Question it FOR SURE, but if what they are implying is true, our world is screwed!

[Em @Em12752]

@QueenAgedChick @Lissx4x @borntoraisehogs @DiligentDenizen Coming at people with your “I’m clearly anti-Candace” approach (referring to people who ask questions or agree on certain topics as following a cult leader or know-knowing) doesn’t help create healthy debate, it only implies you’re biased.

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen 2/2 It is an assumption of many that the vehicle was not processed due to the speed at which it was released I guess. I can’t speak with certified others.

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen 1/2 Sorry, poor word selection on my behalf. Secondary scene is probably more appropriate - a second place where the victim was taken/present which may yield evidence. There’s no legal issue if the car was processed, returned to owner & sold.

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen Yes, correct, it absolutely could be.

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen Well thank you for the respectful communication! Be good if more people could do this. Disagreements & misunderstandings don’t need to end with insults. Stay safe over there!

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen That’s what I wondered. They do appear that way. Be interesting to see what comes out at trial. By the way, love your knives 🫶🏽

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen Ok, so it’s a disagreement of word choice (no, I’m not an American LEO). But I take it we agree that a vehicle used to transport a murder victim should have been processed & it’s very unusual if it was just handed back. And THAT would be a reason to question the narrative?

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen So I think we are agreeing that law enforcement SHOULD HAVE taken the car (let’s not bicker over word choice) & processed it yeah? And it’s VERY weird and/or weird if they didn’t?

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen I don’t. And won’t until we see the trial. I’m just saying it SHOULD have been. If it wasn’t - suspicious and/or extremely negligent of law enforcement, particularly FBI.

[Em @Em12752]

@bpete1969 @DiligentDenizen My friend, it’s not difficult at all for me to understand why the SUV should have been processed. Please open your mind & think a little harder.

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen So if you had a murder investigation & the victim was transported in a private vehicle, with your 30 years experience, you wouldn’t arrange to photograph & process the vehicle for any evidence?

[Em @Em12752]

@QueenAgedChick @Lissx4x @borntoraisehogs @DiligentDenizen The vehicle is actually a secondary scene and should have been seized and processed. You may want to revisit your own ability to think critically.

[Em @Em12752]

@HidnSoldier @DiligentDenizen Because it is a secondary scene. You may want to re-think calling people dip shit retards when YOU have no experience in these kinds of things.

[Em @Em12752]

@BrockBlades @DiligentDenizen Incorrectly. The vehicle is a secondary scene & should have been seized and processed.