![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Madeβ¦ Court acknowledges βunpaid settlement moneyβ
βWith this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Courtβs 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that βthe effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.β It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the membersβ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agencyβs failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agencyβs failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that βit is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.β
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that βthe attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.β
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, βThe court has decided to fully accept the creditorsβ claims,β adding, βThe unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.β"
πhttps://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9EzbsAA8MMT.jpg)
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Madeβ¦ Court acknowledges βunpaid settlement moneyβ
βWith this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Courtβs 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that βthe effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.β It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the membersβ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agencyβs failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agencyβs failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that βit is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.β
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that βthe attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.β
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, βThe court has decided to fully accept the creditorsβ claims,β adding, βThe unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.β"
πhttps://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGX9DgbsAAoqg1.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Euna
@Eournha
π
ππππππππ β 97L | Twinkle, twinkle, little star, ππΆπ―π©π’'s shining in Galaxyβ‘ | μ¬μμΉκ΅¬ also λΉλΉμ§ β¨ | ππ
πππππβ‘β‘
Uncommited | (N)SFW
Joined July 2020
388 Following
454 Followers
9.1K Posts
[NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Madeβ¦ Court acknowledges βunpaid settlement moneyβ
βWith this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Courtβs 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that βthe effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.β It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the membersβ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agencyβs failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agencyβs failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that βit is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.β
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that βthe attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.β
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, βThe court has decided to fully accept the creditorsβ claims,β adding, βThe unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.β"
πhttps://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official
![GFS_backup's tweet photo. [NEWS] 260606 - Exclusive: VIVIZ wins injunction against Big Planet Madeβ¦ Court acknowledges βunpaid settlement moneyβ
βWith this decision, VIVIZ will be able to continue independent activities while the main lawsuit proceeds, and the path has also opened for the group to freely explore the direction of its future activities.
On the 5th, the Seoul Central District Courtβs 50th Civil Agreement Division, presided over by Judge Lee Sanghoon, fully accepted the application for an injunction to suspend the validity of the exclusive contracts filed by the three VIVIZ members against BPM.
In its decision, the court ruled that βthe effect of the exclusive contracts concluded between the creditors and the debtor shall be suspended until the judgment in the main case is delivered.β It also ordered that the agency must not negotiate or conclude contracts with third parties against the membersβ wishes, demand that the members engage in entertainment activities, or request that third parties prohibit the members from carrying out activities.
On March 4, VIVIZ notified the agency of the termination of their exclusive contracts, citing the agencyβs failure to fulfill its obligation to pay settlements, failure to provide management support, and the resulting breakdown of trust between the parties. Since then, both sides have continued a legal battle over the validity of the exclusive contracts.
According to the decision, the court cited the agencyβs failure to pay the promised settlement money as a key basis for its judgment.
The court determined that the settlement money owed to each VIVIZ member was more than 100 million won, stating that βit is reasonable to view the debtor as having violated its obligation to pay settlement money.β
During the trial, the agency argued that it had difficulty paying the settlement money due to an attempted management-rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports concerning Chairman Cha Gawon. However, the court did not accept this argument. The court found that βthe attempted management rights takeover by outside forces and false media reports are merely circumstances unrelated to the creditors.β
The issue of providing settlement records was also a point of dispute. The court pointed out that the settlement statements provided by the agency only listed the amounts of revenue and expenses, without attaching specific supporting materials such as tax invoices and receipts. It also noted that the agency had not provided the related documents afterward or explained how the members could access them.
Attorney Woo Honggyun of Shinwon Law Firm, the legal representative for VIVIZ, said, βThe court has decided to fully accept the creditorsβ claims,β adding, βThe unpaid settlement amount specified in the decision is only part of the total, and we plan to expand the claim during the main lawsuit.β"
πhttps://t.co/mpkpJ9jEH3
#GFRIEND #VIVIZ @VIVIZ_official](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKGYC7Da8AAyQ4c.png)
Sebentar lagi kita ketemu, sayangnya mama dan papa β‘
@insomnia92x Mau yang besaaaaarrr~
Who to follow
βΎ Hana Putri
@saminaminanana
πΈ 1996 | Optimist dalam setiap langkah | Cerita tak terhingga di dunia OCRP | Selalu berusaha melihat sisi terang dalam segala hal | β¨
ππππππππ πππππππ
@BAITKlSAH
ππππππ ππππ.β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β β ππ’πππ€ πππ π²ππ§π π₯ππ’π§ π‘ππ§π²π.β β β β β β β β β βββββββββββββββββββ
RAFIF ALVANENDRA
@jongsoengl
ππππππππ β Goresan pena https://t.co/QTeJGFmMmR; Sejuta netra terpana dalam afsun membuncah dari sang ikon generasi keempat. ππ»π±πΌπΏππ² : @MANUSKRlP
@EunbiSociety Happy birthday, Eunha noona! πβ¨
Wishing you endless happiness, good health, beautiful memories, and countless reasons to smile today and always. ππ·
@eunnhac @Eournha @unajungi
#EunhaOnlyWayIsMilkyWay
(https://t.co/NmdyC0DefM)
@EunbiSociety Happy birthday eunha! May the wind carry your dreams to the stars, may the sun light your path with warmth.
#EunhaOnlyWayIsMilkyWay
@eunhaam @Eournha @eunnhac @ulzzyag @unajungi α
https://t.co/W69ET8d25C
@umujii Gomawooo umji-yaaaa~β‘
@suilebe Thank you Sui~β‘
Senyum
@_ smilee~~
@yipihyun Yihyun juga cantik~ mana foto cantikmuuu
@ssszzzn9 Siang oppa
@wnteou Terang banget ituuuu~
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.1M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.3M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.6M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.3M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.4M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.5M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.3M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60M followers
β¨
β
π«