haii semua! #studytwt
aku akt 27, lagi nyari #moots sesama pejuang PTN (◍•ᴗ•◍) !
bebas koo mau sekedar #moots, atau sampe belajar bareng sebagai #motivasi ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ !
akt berapapun boleeh yak!
bagi yang mau berteman&belajar bareng,bisa DM aku yaa, makasii
guyss #studytwt#moots, mau tanya dong (^^)
kalian sekarang belajarnya itu lebih banyak ke arah tka atau utbk??
kalo aku sih mengamati "trend" tag belajar ini malah lebih banyak yang belajar buat utbk °-° #penasaran
haii semua! #studytwt
aku akt 27, lagi nyari #moots sesama pejuang PTN (◍•ᴗ•◍) !
bebas koo mau sekedar #moots, atau sampe belajar bareng sebagai #motivasi ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ !
akt berapapun boleeh yak!
bagi yang mau berteman&belajar bareng,bisa DM aku yaa, makasii
@sosmedkeras Lain kali kalo mau membuat suatu meme atau pernyataan itu riset dulu mas / mbak, biar ga terjadi salah paham. Jangan langsung ambil dari satu berita kemudian langsung menyimpulkan premis seperti contoh pada postingan ini.
@SilverKey1b@bipdagoat second, my point is, why are u making adult petite women and included them to llis meanwhile definition of "lli" itself is "looks like young girl" in the first place? most of llis seen as their look rather than their age.
@SilverKey1b@bipdagoat first, llis can be fictional body but where the design of llis body come from? i had explained to you that fiction doesn't come from nothing, right?
@SilverKey1b@bipdagoat third, and I didn't said u were making fallacy, I just wanna show that you're inconsistent. if u already know that Barthes was wrong, you didn't have to threw that I was doing a fallacy u called "death of author fallacy"
@SilverKey1b@bipdagoat second, you are consistently doing same as Barthes' theory said. you are making adult petite woman -> me as person who can evaluate your art. you can't suddenly separate yourself to "creator of fiction" and make a new variable about this argument.
@SilverKey1b@bipdagoat first, how was it related to non sequitur? you were supposed to say that I did death of the author fallacy, then I told u bout that, and you said Barthes is wrong and u separate it by say "creator of a fiction". precisely you are the one who contradicting urself (next comment)