Is America a Sovereign nation? Last time I checked Sovereigns have unlimited power to contract. I guess I haven't seen the contract but if I make a agreement to protect someone, it doesn't mean that they have complete liberty to act like a completely unrestrained jackass and expect complete unlimited liability for their actions. In this case, again, unless i am mistaken, Ukraine continually poked Russia. Ukraine has been pushing its young men to war with Ukraine for what?
. Nearly two decades? <all the while sporting nazi signia> And still even today the fighters are dragged against their will to the front lines. It's abhorrent that any American money was used to support that war effort. They should of surrendered LONG ago, and what ever "agreement" was made should of been nullified, by fraud <surely it existed> from its beginning. Woukdnt be the first "treaty" the U.S. renigg'd on.
And just look at the state of "glorious" Ukraine now. ptf. Ridiculous.. All of you who support the Ukrainian war effort have gone the way of the full sail, full send, retards.
And if you disagree.. i think you should full stop every single thing you are doing, and get your ass to the front lines, and support the war effort you so vehemently demand others do.
Is America a Sovereign nation? Last time I checked Sovereigns have unlimited power to contract. I guess I haven't seen the contract but if I make a agreement to protect someone, it doesn't mean that they have complete liberty to act like a completely unrestrained jackass and expect complete unlimited liability for their actions. In this case, again, unless i am mistaken, Ukraine continually poked Russia. Ukraine has been pushing its young men to war with Ukraine for what?
. Nearly two decades? <all the while sporting nazi signia> And still even today the fighters are dragged against their will to the front lines. It's abhorrent that any American money was used to support that war effort. They should of surrendered LONG ago, and what ever "agreement" was made should of been nullified, by fraud <surely it existed> from its beginning. Woukdnt be the first "treaty" the U.S. renigg'd on.
And just look at the state of "glorious" Ukraine now. ptf. Ridiculous.. All of you who support the Ukrainian war effort have gone the way of the full sail, full send, retards.
And if you disagree.. i think you should full stop every single thing you are doing, and get your ass to the front lines, and support the war effort you so vehemently demand others do.
Is America a Sovereign nation? Last time I checked Sovereigns have unlimited power to contract. I guess I haven't seen the contract but if I make a agreement to protect someone, it doesn't mean that they have complete liberty to act like a completely unrestrained jackass and expect complete unlimited liability for their actions. In this case, again, unless i am mistaken, Ukraine continually poked Russia. Ukraine has been pushing its young men to war with Ukraine for what?
. Nearly two decades? <all the while sporting nazi signia> And still even today the fighters are dragged against their will to the front lines. It's abhorrent that any American money was used to support that war effort. They should of surrendered LONG ago, and what ever "agreement" was made should of been nullified, by fraud <surely it existed> from its beginning. Woukdnt be the first "treaty" the U.S. renigg'd on.
And just look at the state of "glorious" Ukraine now. ptf. Ridiculous.. All of you who support the Ukrainian war effort have gone the way of the full sail, full send, retards.
@RaymondMaitland@WHLeavitt This is my third x account. I like X, and this account. As a based okie savage, I am still learning how to behave myself in modern society and good company. Admittedly, I have a long way to go.
@WHLeavitt I have so many unclaimed prizes from Elon. All I want is a 10-minute meeting, with the actual @ElonMusk to convince him that what is have to bring to the table is worth penciling in other review meeting's, for project launch digital rubber stamp approval.
As a 1st nations indigenous tribal member, anyone that comes to these lands expecting that others convert to their ways are NOT only NOT WELCOME HERE, THEY ARE SNAKES in in the middle of otherwise peaceable cowboys & Indians.
Really all we need is the green light & we can easily run em all out of town.
I think the harder problem isn't prediction.
It's preparing for being wrong.
History suggests humans rarely predict second and third order effects particularly well.
We didn't perfectly predict financial crises.
We didn't perfectly predict social media.
We didn't perfectly predict industrialization.
And we almost certainly won't perfectly predict increasingly capable AI systems either.
This is probably why resilient systems matter so much.
If we can not perfectly predict downstream consequences, then building guardrails that scale alongside capability becomes more important—not less.
Civilization already solves problems this way.
We build brakes before crashes.
Audits before fraud.
Redundancies before failures.
Oversight before catastrophe.
The question probably isn't:
"Can we predict everything?"
It's:
"Can we build systems resilient enough when we can't?"
//Hey Goverment; Review my AXR governance architecture, and if there doesn't exist any better, adopt it into law! I'm pretty sure you won't find better, but you will not know if you do not review it. 🤠🤓✊️
I partially agree.
We probably cannot predict the full downstream consequences.
But that's precisely why governance, oversight, containment, audits, and safety layers exist.
Airplanes were not made safe because humans perfectly predicted failure.
They became safer because humans built systems that assume failure will happen.
Maybe increasingly capable AI systems require the same thinking.
This resonates.
I keep running into the same thing:
Capability conversations are everywhere.
The harder conversation seems to be:
What needs to exist so increasingly powerful systems don't outpace the societies deploying them?
I've spent roughly the last 1.5 years obsessing over that problem.
I'm curious what your answer is.
I think this is exactly the problem.
We are racing into systems powerful enough to reshape institutions while simultaneously saying:
"We'll figure governance out later."
Maybe the answer isn't slowing progress.
Maybe it's building governance fast enough to keep up.
Love the "prisoners' delema" analogy, it's based and lands hard.
@SemperMosaddegh@dnlklr I could absolutely build that community and have the business plan already dialed in, but. its location is in the middle of the ocean. Want to see the pitch?
@MarcusSpillane@sriramk I increasingly think the positive 25-year AI future is mostly a governance problem.
Capability without institutions feels unstable.
I've spent ~1.5 years building governance architecture because I suspect that's the harder problem.
I think the missing conversation is not capability forecasting but institutional forecasting.
What does oversight look like?
What does adjudication look like?
What does governance look like?
What new institutions are required if increasingly consequential decisions become increasingly automated?
I ask because I spent roughly the last 1.5 years attempting to build governance architecture around exactly these problems and I increasingly think the institutional questions are the bigger problem.