Eren Vance

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@kukakonga @ben_grossman ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26 only one

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@thewooftoken ethereum:0xa912c71c0e53701153cad9ba73e9b7d854418eae

[Woof @thewooftoken]

WOOF WOOF WOOF

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@gocollectfun @GummieD Check your DMs. I’ve got an awesome method that fixes this perfectly.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@hulknobanner only one ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@Condo_ERC ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@mogaritaville @69420xyz @gocollectfun I’ve got a solid way to solve this LP issue without needing a full relaunch.
How can I get this in front of the official team so they actually see it?

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@gocollectfun dm

[Condo Ondo @CondoOndo]

- Sent from the condo

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@BullOracle10 @PolarBerAI 1 ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26 = 1 ethereum:0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

1 ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26 = 1 ethereum:0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3

[Patryx @patryx]

Nice to finally see ethereum:0xfe99b2fe66c7725ce30730010a864740e7c39b26 highlighted on X

[Tanaka @Tanaka_L2]

ETH was just showing a few random signs of life, but the onchain numbers are starting to look more coordinated.

Some warmup definitely happening and most of it is routing through @Uniswap v4.

– $3.72B volume on Ethereum over the last 7d

– ~59% of all Uniswap volume on mainnet, up from 54% share in Aug

– 24h print got pretty chunky too at $664M v4 volume vs $1B across all Uni on ETH

Basically the new plumbing is becoming the default plumbing.

The more interesting stat for me is RHC vs ETH.

Over 30d RHC still crushes ETH on v4 volume at $19.5B vs $13.5B.

But over the last 7d ETH flipped it. ETH v4 $3.72B vs RHC $3.40B.

Tiny lead, nowhere near enough to scream reversal yet, but first time the direction actually starts matching the mainnet season thesis.

The meme activity is still a sidecar.

But the sidecar suddenly got actual distribution.

– @Stockereum was doing ~$22M 24h platform volume

– @senderdotfamily ~$7M+ volume

– $SEND itself still doing ~$2.3-2.6M daily volume and ~$17.6M over 7d

– $CONDO/ONDO ~$1M daily

– $WOOF/SHIB ~$1.9M daily

– ethereum:0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722 proved mainnet can still print a ~$20M runner before cooling

The question now is whether the chain can produce runner #2 after ethereum:0x4e67db19044549ff420860834c91b45bad298722.

RHC showed what happens when the crowd arrives. Pons did hundreds of millions in weekly volume during peak trench season.

ETH pads are still tiny vs that scale.

I’m watching $CONDO and $WOOF closely because those are the two names showing actual lore + interesting catalysts right now.

If non-WETH quote volume keeps growing, v4 ETH keeps taking share, and the next runner can push toward $100M.

Then the trenches actually came home.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

Begin again.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@ManaMoonNFT @senderdotfamily

[toospooky @toospooky]

I think the $send bad narrative collapsed when dude started attacking $condo with a "new team relaunch." Didn't make sense since the issue that was highlighted was for the ETH deployments. Not the alt/stock pairs. If Ondo wasn't affected why attack Condo so hard?

Another major nonsense issue is just how liquidity works in the first place. It's an imaginary horrible acting like no one is going to LP above said deployment range. If anything it make being a liquidity provider more lucrative as market makers would no longer be competing for fees with initial LPs. APRs would skyrocket with volatility and money would move into range to benefit from it. That's literally why V3 was created.

Another massive issue from the beginning with the fud is, despite how much technical knowledge was pushed to make the point, how pricing is set by token ratios in LPs makes it impossible to insinuate something like a "hard cap" even exists. ETH and stocks are volatile assets. The launchpad deployments were set with an ETH price, not a USD price. The "cap" would have been pegged to the ETH pricing USD value, not an actual hard USD number. So any hypothetical "hard cap" would increase with ETHs price. $2400 ETH price cap is different than $12,000 ETH price cap.

So imo, this was a fud campaign to vampire the current winning ETH launchpad, capitalizing on a knowledge vacuum about liquidity by overblowing a smaller issue into a fake doomsday narrative. It worked though. Many of you all fell for pumping the hell out of his bags overnight. That in itself is impressive.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@SethInvestz @ManaMoonNFT @Condo_ERC You’re mixing it up.
On Send you can still buy on Uniswap after the locked range. Initial LP just caps around 10M, depth thins — normal.
Anyone can add higher liquidity, same as https://t.co/80CnpKrffY for years.
It can go higher with community LP. Not cope.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@0xSn0wMan @Stockereum @senderdotfamily Send locked LP has ~10M upper range. Beyond that depth thins — normal.
Still a standard Uniswap v4 pool. Anyone can add higher liquidity. https://t.co/80CnpKrffY and similar platforms have worked this way for years.Token isn’t broken. Just needs users to add the next LP layer.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@ManaMoonNFT @Condo_ERC Stop the FUD.
Send locked LP has ~10M upper range. Beyond that depth thins — normal.
Still a standard Uniswap v4 pool. Anyone can add higher https://t.co/Zk0EhVIhtc and similar platforms have worked this way for years.Token isn’t broken. Just needs users to add the next LP layer.

[Eren Vance @ErenVance]

@ManaMoonNFT @Condo_ERC Stop the FUD.
Send locked LP has ~10M upper range. Beyond that depth thins — normal.
Still a standard Uniswap v4 pool. Anyone can add higher https://t.co/Zk0EhVIhtc and similar platforms have worked this way for years.Token isn’t broken. Just needs users to add the next LP layer.