I think I'm going to be stepping back from this platform for a while. So if you need me:
- https://t.co/nKeIECFm3h
- https://t.co/kJpwqxw6VW
- https://t.co/sOl1pwu82e
- https://t.co/jHESuaa2Yv
- https://t.co/yC8LOEbnTV
Perhaps I'll be back here again at some point.
Panelists from a wide range of backgrounds joined an inspiring session at #ISSRDC to share how diversity & accessibility will tackle the challenges of space exploration.
“You don’t see yourself in the room until you see someone like you in the room,” Eric Ingram, @Scoutdotspace
🌍 Happy #EarthDay! Today, as we celebrate the magnificence of our planet, let's broaden our perspective to encompass the vastness of space and the critical role of in-space observation in safeguarding both Earth and the cosmic environment.
#SpaceSustainability#SpaceSafety
A Houston-based company is attempting to make the first-ever commercial moon landing today, and the first by a U.S.-built spacecraft in more than 50 years.
Commercial space expert Eric Ingram offers his expertise on the timing of the moon landing.
We're pleased to announce that long-time aerospace and defense executive Philip Hover-Smoot has been named Scout Space's Chief Executive Officer (CEO).
Read full statement: https://t.co/Fn8uUT9YeH
🎄SCOUT is excited to present our LIMITED EDITION 2023 Holiday Sweater! The sweater will only be around until 12/31/2023. Grab yours for a discounted price with code "SCOUTHOLIDAY" and join in on the festivities and fun by representing SCOUT this holiday season!!!
We are over the moon to announce one more conference partner:
@Scoutdotspace
Co-founded by two SEDS alumni, SCOUT is developing software that de-risks space operations for spacecraft. Hear from their founders,
@Eric_Ingram
and Sergio Gallucci at SpaceVision 2023.
I've seen dozens of "Twitter experts" misunderstand this (often time by adding "Breaking..." to their post for extra clicks) so let me reiterate and further explain what Chris details below.
SpaceX LEADS the investigation. SpaceX issues the corrective actions. They pre-write a mishap investigation plan before they even launch. Then they execute their plan if they have an actual mishap. The FAA formally reviews the plan and also the investigation results and SpaceX-recommended corrective actions (but...informally they already know what's coming because of close coordination). The FAA provides feedback, and could recommend adding something if warranted. Their main job is to verify and enforce that SpaceX does what SpaceX said it will do once they approve the final report. In reality, 90% or more of corrective actions may be finished before the report is even formally submitted. Just depends on how well the root cause(s) are understood and easy to fix.
The general public often believes the FAA writes all the corrective actions and has a large team of people conducting the investigation with a heavy hand (e.g. "the big bad government"). No way. I doubt that will ever be the case for any mishap or anomaly. That is simply not how the government is staffed.
The FAA (and their NASA colleagues who have the relevant technical expertise) are typically in super close contact with the SpaceX team through the head of SpaceX Flight Reliability (where the chief engineers reside).
The statements released by the government are usually kept vague but factual, often to the great dismay of social and traditional media (as well as "stans") who want a juicy bite, ideally brimming with conflict. It is in a government agency's best interest to maintain flexibility and work with who they are overseeing...while keeping the politicians and click-bait journalists and influencers away. Inflammatory statements could rally politicians to one side or the other, and then SpaceX and the FAA's job could become charged and harder. Many people want to see that happen for many reasons.
If the final approval stalls, often times it is over a corrective action that was too open to interpretation. As an example of what I mean, if a corrective action is worded as such:
"Redesign of the launch pad to increase its robustness."
Ooh boy. So you want to break that down into discrete actions defining what "robustness" means.
If you want to learn more about the FAA's role, read their website here:
https://t.co/Xod2Gt6QDf
Just in!⚡️SCOUT & Stanford University’s Space Rendezvous Laboratory (SLAB) have been selected by SpaceWERX for a Phase II STTR to address the most pressing challenges in the Department of the Air Force (DAF).
Read the story on SpaceNews: https://t.co/98FUShJC51
Urgent call to all my remote sensing friends to push out timely imagery / fire analysis for Kihei, HI. Friends on the ground have indicated that they're not getting good info for evacuation decision making. Any help is appreciated.