๐จ QT FUNDED ANOTHER PAYOUT DISPUTE. TRADERS ARE STILL WAITING FOR CLEAR ANSWERS.
This is no longer just one complaint. Multiple traders are publicly questioning QT Funded's use of โexcessive margin usageโ to reject payouts.
Hereโs what the evidence shared by traders shows:
๐น @FxDharan Says his payout was rejected for โHIGH MARGIN USAGE.โ QT Funded later described the activity as malicious trading and forfeited the profits. The trader is demanding the exact trades and risk thresholds.
๐น @lostfromlight Asked QT Funded what actually qualifies as excessive margin usage. QT's response said it could mean 80โ90% margin usage, but offered no precise threshold in that reply.
๐น @ErrorP4y Claims he never used more than 70% margin, with only one trade reaching that level, yet says his payout was rejected. He is asking QT to explain why.
The bigger issue is simple:
If 80โ90% is considered excessive, where is the clearly defined limit? If a trader stays below that level, why is the payout still rejected?
Traders should not have to discover critical risk thresholds only after requesting their money.
@QtFunded@Finn_QTFunded@AlexQuantTekel
QT FUNDED: Publish the exact margin limits, identify the trades involved, and provide evidence for every payout rejection.
Repeated complaints deserve serious answers. Traders deserve transparency, not vague explanations.
PropFirmShinobi is watching this case.
#PropFirm #PropFirmScam #PropTrading
@QtFunded Check my trades I never use more than 70 percent of margin. And I only use 70 percent margin in one trade only otherwise all others trades is under 70 percent of margin. So why you rejected my payout??
@QtFunded Check my trades I never use more than 70 percent of margin. And I only use 70 percent margin in one trade only otherwise all others trades is under 70 percent of margin. So why you rejected my payout??
@FxDharan Here's the proof -
Team is clearly saying no fixed margin rule so how we traders can trade and I only use max 70 percent margin. I never exceed 70 percent margin so how is this breached?? First you didn't mentioned max margin rule and saying 70 percent margin is high ?? How ??
@FxDharan@AlexQuantTekel this is not fair. You need to answer it. First of all you guys not mentioned how much max margin is and we only use 70 to 80 percent margin still you guys reject our payout. You are scammers
๐จ PROP FIRM TRADERS, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION!
I traded, followed the rules as I understood them, generated profits, and when it came to paying out my hard-earned money, QT rejected my payout citing "HIGH MARGIN USAGE."
Let that sink in.
If high margin usage is a payout violation, WHY isn't it clearly communicated before traders start trading?
Why allow traders to trade, build profits, meet payout requirements, and only raise this concern when they request their money?
Traders deserve clear rules, not surprises at payout time.
I am demanding:
1. The exact trades that allegedly violated the rule.
2. The specific margin usage threshold breached.
3. The exact clause in the Terms & Conditions.
4. A transparent explanation of why my payout was rejected.
A prop firm's credibility isn't measured by how many traders it attracts. It's measured by how fairly it pays traders who earn profits.
QT, traders deserve answers. Not excuses.
Let's make transparency a standard in the prop firm industry.
@Finn_QTFunded@AlexQuantTekel@QtFunded@FXEmpirecom@propassociation@PropFirmsGuru@PropFirmShinobi@PropFirmMatch
#QT #PropFirms #PropTrading #TradingCommunity #TraderRights #PayoutTransparency